alex80Okay, but you can see that the IDF would post stats that are biased towards them, right?
Possibly. Possibly not. Your question is irrelevant to this though, since you asked if IDF is killing Hamas, not how many. Hamas has the real numbers, but they do not differentiate between militants and civilians.
alex80Like if you say I cant use the stats from one side of the conflict, that means you cant use stats from the other side.
Israel is a real military, with a good intelligence agency, with different viewpoints (a democracy), with scrutiny by many international orgs, with a good record. So actually I can do this. But this is besides the point.
alex80500 Palestinian children dead in 2014 summer, by my calculations that date appears to be before October 7th 2023...
Sucks... but Oct 7th wasn't the first attack by Hamas. Their charter says jews should be exterminated after all.
alex80When I talk about hamas soldiers to civilians, I am talking about the civilian:militant casualty rate, making a point about how while the IDF claims that they are fighting Hamas, they are massacring tons of civilians while barely killing any Hamas soldiers.
Source? I don't think we know how many Hamas soldiers die, because the only source is... Hamas. Also this ratio is not important. We'd only care about how much Israel does to prevent civilian deaths, not how many militants they kill. Read the definition of proportionality on page 1-6 here. We only care about how much Israel does to prevent civilian deaths. Given the use of Hamas of human shields, and the fact that the IDF gives warning shots and that the way it strikes Hamas buildings is completely correct (use of precision weapons on the target building then the closest buildings because that is where the target flees)
vlad80These are 2 different points im making, both that the IDF is collectively punishing all of Gaza for "crimes" that they themselves have committed on a FAR larger scale, and that in that "mission" about "fighting terrorism", they seem to only be killing civilians, mostly children and women...
Source.
Hello... where is the source for this?
vlad80You admit that without Hamas, the conflict would still exist. You just proved my whole argument, that this is colonialism and unjustified. If there was no Hamas, Israel would have to invent (which they did) Hamas, so they have fingers to point at so that gullible suckers like you would sit there with your thumb in your mouth screaming "KHAMAS IS TERRORIST
Israel did not "invent" Hamas lol. Another militant group would replace them if they were gone because the Palestinian public supports killing Israelis. Israel gave Hamas a chance when they evicted their Gaza settlers, and Hamas did not take it and just started bombing Israel from there.
vlad80you being "iffy" on Iraq and pro invading Afghanistan really just seals the deal here, you are a pro-imperialist pro-colonialist who cares only about the spreading US hegemony,
Yeah... you got me there with your psychoanalysis. I'm a realpolitik guy. How you got that I hecking love the US from being iffy on Iraq and pro Afghanistan is beyond me. I would rather not have US hegemony, but US hegemony is better than any other country right now. The US needs to intervene more, not less, in Israel so Hamas can be eradicated and peace be reached.
vlad80You show that to you, middle-easterns are subhuman and their life is worth less,
You really got me here... This is why I think Hamas shouldn't hide in civilian buildings so Palestinians don't have to die. This is some great factual argument we're having. Tell me more about what I really believe.
vlad80Yeah man, the ICC is definitely the holiest and most righteous and trustworthy body out there!
No, but it is the only international authoritative body on war crimes. UN resolutions are meaningless.
vlad80Why are you being surprised that the statistics that orgs around the world are using are coming from groups WITHIN palestine, how else would the stats get out there?
Not surprised Hamas doesn't let independent orgs gather data. Doesn't mean their data isn't inflated.
vlad80Therein lies the rub, you don't see settlers as terrorists. You don't see people that show up to houses armed to the teeth with assault rifles that kick the original inhabitants out to make room for themselves as terrorists
This is just violence buddy. Terrorism has a specific meaning. Why are you so fixated on it? I already condemned the settlers. You're grasping at straws.
vlad80All in all, you are pro-war and think that the US and Israel can do no wrong, you support Afghanistan, you essentially support Iraq, you probably thought Libya was a good idea too.
I am pro war... against Hamas. This is the only way I see peace in this conflict. If Hamas is gone. I can't wait for this to happen, so Palestinian civilians don't have to be used as human shields.