Toaster shut the fuck up, you have literally no fucking clue as to what you're talking about and your differing responses in both threads makes you out to be a huge idiotic hypocrite. "I didn't read" isn't an excuse, it's just fucking idiocy. And hacking isn't theft in this context. You aren't stealing anything when you aimbot or wallhack in a first person shooter.

It really bothers me how hard you're lobbying against insom in this thread when you defended phrakture in the mge alts thread, especially considering:

1) It was obvious that the account that was vac'd belonged to Phrakture.

2) There was actual proof that Phrakture used the account to hack in TF2.

Again it wasn't in a match and Phrakture hasn't been caught on client, but as of now there hasn't been any proof that has shown insom hacking in tf2. Why do you seem find this case different just because the VAC was on Insom's main account? Would you have been ok with it if he hacked in CS:GO on an alt account? Would that have made a difference? The community really does need to take a stance, but if you're going to make an example out of Insom you're going to have make an example out of Phrakture as well.

If insom is banned and chilluminati's matches are overturned, then the same thing should happen to phrakture and WELOVEANIME.

No Exceptions.

But in reality, we all know nothing will happen either way.

I like how people that were defending Phrakture are now jumping all over Insom just because the VAC is actually on his main account. There shouldn't be a difference if you know it was him that hacked, which in the Phrakture case it was pretty fucking easy to tell that the account belonged to him even before he actually owned up to it. Come on guys, have some fucking consistency.

http://puu.sh/42tTd

You could have at least tried a little harder by using an actual in game screen shot for Ghosts.

http://steosphere.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cod4mp-image026.jpg

http://media1.gameinformer.com/imagefeed/featured/activision2013/call-of-duty/ghosts/CODGhostsHandson610.jpg

Now I'll give you that Ghosts does look a little bit better, But is it really a big enough jump to justify the insane minimum requirements that IW is trying to push on you? Especially when you compare this to other games that look way better and came out up to about 2 or so years ago.

They are insane considering that it still looks like a game from 2007. Also what the fuck is the deal with the 50 GB install when the ps3 version uses like 6 GB from the blu ray disc? Or maybe it was around 10. I don't remember. What justifies those requirements other than the fact that Infinity Ward is fucking awful at making a PC game now days?

http://puu.sh/41wAi

It should be more than obvious that Valve has not had any idea how to properly balance their weapons for years now. Winger's a good example of it too. They couldn't get people to use it off of what it was originally intended to be used for so they gave it a dumb gimmick. As much as I like the extra mobility it gives me as a scout player, that's all it really is. A gimmick.

The damage nerf and apparent reload nerf (even though it was supposed to be a buff, good job valve) makes the crossbow way weaker, and it would have been perfectly fine the way it was if they had just fixed the dumb rapid fire bug.

they reduced the damage but halved the reload time.

This thread has more "useful and thoughtful discussion" than at least half the threads on this entire forum. Have you actually seen some of the shit people post here?

PsYcHo
undenied
the mayor of ghettoville
snark bait
Mr. Munchlax

http://i.imgur.com/q5p6obk.jpg

This. The passive reload is without a doubt a beneficial change for the crossbow and the weapon shouldn't be banned entirely. Since stv demos are uploaded after a match it shouldn't be hard to provide proof that a medic was abusing the glitch and overturn the round(s) where it was used.

http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/559863671857272205/0EF56419B627FC3E0DAA56E244DDFACCCC601BBE/

I am now a dog both irl and in tf2