i expect people to stop being so ignorant. to get off their finger pressing downfrags and state an opinion for a change.

unbiased, unprejudiced, impartial, non-discriminatory, broad-minded........rational.

i'm not flexing my ego. like Socrates once said, "I only know that i know nothing". i'm not trying to give the image of arrogance, but this is a matter of credibility. do you know why it's a matter of credibility? because i referenced the works and philosophies of brilliant people with intellectual capacity to fundament my thesis.

what are people agains't this basing on? that people can like whatever they want? that i have mental retardation or, as shifta said, autism? there's no argument, there's no factual basis, there's no intellectual or historical reference, there's only ignorance and blind hatred/discrimination.

there's no "come on".

zeitgeist theory, philosophy of plato, the remarks of Ayn Rand about objectivism in her books The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Standpoint theory, radical skepticism. objectivism as addressed in The Capitalist Manifesto, Epistemology as a fundamental basis of human wisdom, and all the works of pre-socratic philosophers.

or do you think that's equivalent to "do you literally have mental retardation" and downfragging without stating opinions?

you can't be that naive, and i expect you not to.

crud is not subjective at all.

everyone in this thread besides few exceptions has been doing nothing but downfragging and complaining about my point of view with their own mediocre, ignorant opinion.

all i brought here wasn't the work of a random who thinks he knows what good animes are. it's an ideology, the most objective one you can have, hence the name. it's imparcial, scientific, enlightening, the very materialization of the truth , as an aspect of human nature.

why don't you take a guess, i discussed logically,not on the mere aspect of opinions, but to a fundamental level, factual basis

and the representation of everyone else who disagrees:

heads up pal, who do you think has more credibility?
come up with something smart and then we can talk

also, ruri's law is still applying

are you dumb or you're just pretending? have you even read the other comments so you can have some context? jesus.....

refer to post #94.

yeah, sure. which it was exactly what i was gonna do

until people called me "mentally retarded" for disagreeing with my opinion.

that is sign of a really mediocre community who can't have a healthy discussion for the sake of it.

You forgot one

Crawford’s Corollary: Should you ever find that less than 90% seem to be crud, your standard is set too low and should be adjusted.

Critic's corollary is more than easy to prove when the majority have decided to take a stand of perpetual silence.
unfortunately, this forum encourages folks who don't have the capacity of argument to downfrag as an act of disagreement without needing to say anything valid. what a flawed system. And i'm gonna prove that with this comment alone. just watch the frags.

also, you're more than corret with the Ruri's law

"Most people have lazy minds and are not willing to think things through, or understand them. In today's action-oriented society, convenience and expedience are favored over care and wisdom when it comes to developing solutions for our problems. So people tend to make bad decisions without thinking them through. They also tend to resist learning new things greatly, staying within the comfortable realm of the familiar"

Objective judgement is based on strong supporting evidence, Measurement is allegedly a means to reach objective judgements, judgements attainable through only reasonable methods like logic, expressing truth regarding reality

their true nature must be detachable from their perspective and individual appearance, and a qualitative consensus has to made, through standards fundamented by the objective judgements mentioned above. it's the only attainable way of objective analysis in the spectrum of human creation
so no, it's not a place-holder methodology at all

you seem to be implying the standpoint theory as a basis to deny my judgement. make no mistakes, for as standpoint theory is a flawed contextual empiricism that ignores completely the epistemic values

if i were to derive myself through the conceptions of plato or Radical skepticism, then objective reality would never be conceivable,maybe you're misunderstanding when evaluating that i'm constructing my thesis on those.

you're right about this, and i should have not used entertainment, the idea i was trying to give is transformation of metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—any type of art.

no anime is perfect. even the best ones have a great deal of flaws if analysed correctly. by this point, people will base on fallacious arguments and use those flaws as a illusory breach of rightness.

i'll see how long this ignorance plays out and maybe then...

people questioned my sanity and accused me equivocally, had to prove a point.

contrary to popular belief, all forms of entertainment are objectively quantified by setting standards reasonably fundamented on non-arbitrary attributes that constitutes the form of art in regard

and to be clear, objective values lies outside of one's perception of belief.

and then you might ask, how can art, which needs individual perception and it involves the connection with one's feelings, and therefore, subjectivism, be objectively measured?

by the zeitgeist theory, once aesthetic choices are accepted, the value of the work of art is determined by its capacity to transcend the limits of its chosen medium to strike some universal chord by the rarity of the skill of the artist or in its accurate reflection.

and by that, i mean something logical, fundamented not on distorted visions of ignorant subjectivism, but to a certain degree, a reasonably structured characteristic
there are a few examples of animes that can be deemed objectively good, by traits which are too long and complex for me to resume
for one to have the required sense of notion to perceive the objectively good traits you have to abide by to objectivism to understand quality distinction

ugh, why can't people recommend objectively good animes instead of the ones you like due to your distorted perception of what can be deemed good...

amazing frags dude.

niiiiiceee dude.

when i use it, it gives me a giant pink error thingy that covers the whole screen.