I've used several different methods over the years. First and foremost is the hammer fist on my desk. Letting out frustration in a physical way is the most rewarding and calming action for me personally. Yeah, my cats run away at light speed, my wife calls asking what I broke this time and I have damaged and repaired 3 desks in the past but I do feel better after hitting something.

The second thing I do when things are not going well is get up out of my chair and just walk around for a minute. Maybe pet a cat or 3 and calm down. I think you would be surprised on how the body reacts after you sit down again. You basically start fresh again.

I'm not looking forward to work tomorrow

Nick Foles is throwing fucking darts right now, holy shit. He is straight out performing Brady at the moment. Just threw perfect ball into double, almost triple coverage for a TD.

edit: and Brady shuts me the fuck up with a perfect drive.

What a great game.

I love the car commercials for the Super Bowl. The main selling point I just saw was 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. What in the hell does any normal person need with a car that fast off the line? You are just asking to get into a car accident and kill someone going from red light to red light with that kind of speed. Completely useless to give an untrained driver a car that performs like a racing car.

agreed discord fucking blows. However, the OP says you only need a discord account.
Are you required to use that piece of shit or can you just create an account and use Mumble for your team in the tournaments? I would hate to be forced into using a program that I don't want to use in order to play.

Fuck, even a dead team got ranked above us. TBH, I've been feeling 23rd lately =(

Thanks a lot Hedge

Average age of that flank is currently 35

Tulk is an old friend of mine, can't say enough good things. Lots of experience, level headed, mature and not content with just playing to play the game, he wants to improve all the time. You would be hard pressed to find a better pickup for a team intent on building and growing together.

luc, nobody played this game way before you since you started in season 2. You're fucking old too, welcome to the club.

I don't get it. I'm sorry that I am dumb and can't figure it out. I do remember that match and ppl complained about a lot of different things. Can someone connect the dots for me how we are this match? Brian help, I want to understand why we are so bad!

says Published on Oct 28, 2016

Would love to have been in the room to listen to that last one.

I don't see why that is really a factor. In 150 years, you will have the same breakdown of the facts as you have right now. If you are saying that emotional attachments and personal reasons cloud judgement then that person should not truly be involved in the discussion IMO.

In mostly every case, you have a human being that did both "good" and "bad" things in their life. Some great individuals do "exceptionally good" and "exceptionally bad" acts in their life. Why would any logical debate / argument or discussion completely ignore anything "good" just because of the exceptionally bad?

I'm not saying it evens out, I am saying that in order to objectively look and dissect a topic, you must take into account everything from both sides. Stalin was a tyrant and many believe he was worse than Hitler. I think that is true only because Germany lost against Russia and Stalin had more time after the war to do more evil than Hitler since he was dead.

IMO , the question to ask and more to the OP's class assignment is:
Does being an evil man, like Stalin, automatically make you a bad leader or not the greatest leader?

Even if I didn't know the exact context of this situation, the same type of stuff can be clipped from just about any video you stream on a nightly basis. Its kinda like the boy who cried wolf, there is no way to know which to take seriously cause its so constant. I was watching you late Sunday night in a pug and your team was losing. The whole thing degenerated into a constant "what are these people doing?" or "that's so dumb". The worst part is that nobody was throwing in that pug, they just were not invite players so mistakes were being made. On the flip side, you say the same stuff when the good players are throwing in pugs so its always happening for 1 reason or another.

I'm not trying to argue or talk shit. ppl think its fun / popular to say negative things to you but thats not me and I guess I'm sorry for bring it up in the Stream Highlights Thread. I personally don't have any problem with you and enjoy watching the gameplay you provide on your stream. I just feel you would benefit from going with the flow in any game you play outside a match environment.

Just as a side-note for thought, if other ppl ruin your pug experience by "throwing" or simply not being good, you can likewise ruin other peoples pug experiences by being condescending and/or overly demanding in that "fun" pug. You can also make it annoying for your viewing audience.

I've never been to college but I have studied military history on my own for the better part of 15 years as my hobby. I read every single night and have learned a lot. I find it difficult to believe the only agenda or guideline for this debate is 1 sentence? "Stalin, the greatest Russian leader of all time?" Maybe I am wrong and the teacher wants ppl to be creative but are there no other instructions or clarification?

The reason I ask is because the question is in such a general statement. There are many ways to measure "greatest" and without some form of reference it might make the task more difficult. Greatest Military Leader? Economic and Domestic leader?, etc.

That said, I would think that there has to be a clear case for Stalin being in the discussion, if not the clear choice. Perhaps the main accomplishment you can set your research/debate around could be that he did lead the country from the brink of defeat to a world super power. Naturally there is a lot more involved in that statement but saying he wasn't a great leader for killing 60 million people is not really focusing on the entire argument.

Great leaders can come in many forms and dispositions, being labeled as an "evil man" does not automatically make someone a "bad leader". They all sanction acts that one would consider "evil" to further their own goals and ambitions but the ability to lead a country (good or bad) is the main question.
----For example, how many Roman Emperors are hailed as great leaders? Under each of their rule, untold numbers of slaves were killed throughout the empire for any reason their owners wished. Those deaths were "legal" for the time but do those deaths make the Emperor a bad leader? It is a complex argument/debate and probably why your teacher is making you do it.

edit: waiting for Marxist dissertation on this subject :)

Nope, he gave specific instructions, no comms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mklnXM3LIXo#t=00m37s