Mr_Owlit's an important point, though. companies don't go under because their employees break laws. If the right steps are taken (lpkane stepping down would be a good one), this can and should salvage esea's reputation to some degree.
Maybe it's just me, but this does not change my intentions of playing in ESEA S14 one bit. It's disappointing, but not deal-breaking for me.
Hah! Having him "step down" is enough? He should be dropped like the PR disaster he is along with any product managers, or developers who were responsible for the addition of that code.
Leads to an interesting question? How is "work" on the anti-cheat client managed? Is there a product manager, are there testers, waterfall or agile, etc. How the hell did this go through without anyone asking questions and what changes will ESEA make to ensure this never happens again?