I found a thread called "aimsdick block 9000" where people unironically accused him of something truly outrageous: Using semicolons and knowing Esperanto. At least in that thread, any new user would come to the conclusion that aimsadick is pretty darn cool.

I just wanted to discuss class limits. Sorry if that offends you. Nothing I said made 6s bad or in need of a change in my mind, and I never as much as implied it did.

Okay, now you've stumped me. These types of posts are plenty in this thread. I've found they have become pretty hard to approach. I could just point out that I never called anyone's opinions wrong - But I guess you could just say I am lacking intellectual humility or something along those lines. I could also try explaining that "I disagree" and "you are wrong" are not the same thing, but that'd probably get me plastered by nerd emojis. I could point you the moments I agreed and complimented other's posts, but I guess that'd not work, it'd be arrogant to show that I wasn't arrogant before.

So I guess I'll just let you get away with it. After all, this reads like you're insulting a mirror - Might have something to do with the person in the mirror loudly jumping into a space, telling others' they are dumb and intellectually arrogant for disagreeing with him, and that means they must be automatically wrong.

"Magic mirror on the wall — show me the one I hate most of all."

I've found that less sense the comment makes, less calm the person writing it was :)

In a discussion, it's regular to change one's mind and agree with others. In an argument, the goal is to change others' minds. I've been fine with people disagreeing with me.

You should probably avoid "appeal to authority" in the future. If someone truly knows more about the topic, their knowledge should allow them to discuss it effectively without needing to appeal to their own authority.

Weird analogy. Football does not have player role limitations, except for the goalkeeper. This is probably what you meant, as that's a better analogy.

Anyway, your original analogy sounds like an appeal to tradition. Football also has all kinds of rule changes, despite the tradition of the sport. These rules are also often discussed.

Also, I don't think I was confused on the reason any class limits exist. I think that was quite clear when I explained the Medic limit: It wouldn't be healthy for the meta. If that's wrong, you can always correct me.

I came here to discuss class limits. I am sorry if that offends you. :(

I'm sorry that you found this offensive. :(

True, that is one solution as well.

Failing to form syllogisms or keep track of previously agreed upon definitions can be challenging, That's why making mistakes is completely fine - you can feel differently if you want.

DrHappiness said most here have alexithymia. I hoped that would not be the case. I'm sorry if that offended you and that you feel different.

...

Sorry, let's put that into a format you can grasp: aLExIthYMiA Is CHaRAcTERized By an impaired ABILiTY TO BE awaRE OF, eXpliCITlY iDeNtifY, and DeScrIbE oNE's fEELings

that is true.

Just from checking some one the forum posts, Aimsadick seemed pretty cool dude with the way everyone dogpiled on him. He was a living vibe check and you all failed.

Here's some ways to not come off as a creep online:

Do not: Theorize about users interests, personality or intentions due to the "research" done previously, without ever having interacted with the person. This gives the impression of being curious about the person.

Do: Ask the person about their interests, personality or intentions. Start a dialogue about personal opinions you have found previously and disagree with. This gives the impression of being curious about the topic.

Do not: Obsessively research other person's toenails, address, real name, or other social media profiles, even if they are public. Do not attempt to join friend groups, chat rooms or other social gatherings uninvited. This gives the impression of being obsessed in a specific person.

Do: Research relevant topics for the context. If you need more information, be sure to first get in contact with the person via official channels at relevant times. This gives the impression of being obsessed in a specific topic.

Do not: Defend "the right of" creepiness in it's forms; stalking, obsessive behavior, unsolicited social advances, breaches of privacy. Especially do not do this in form of a protest sign with all caps letters. This gives the impression that you are defending your own actions.

Do: Defend people who were called creepy, not the behavior itself. Be sure to start a two-sided dialogue with the person you disagree with. This gives you the impression of a person who cares about the people affected.

Check the guide. It will make it very clear how to not act creepy after checking people's profiles :)

I agree. You've reached the same conclusion I have, and used the same premises to get there: That the effort put into uncovering completely unnecessary details in place of regular human interaction indeed is creepy and not normal.

https://www.teamfortress.tv/64793/tf-competitive-6v6-class-restrictions#20

https://www.teamfortress.tv/64793/tf-competitive-6v6-class-restrictions#26

https://www.teamfortress.tv/64793/tf-competitive-6v6-class-restrictions/?page=4#94

https://www.teamfortress.tv/64800/guide-for-how-to-not-be-a-creep-on-teamfortress-tv#17

https://imgur.com/a/zgtKoVA

Well I am not disagreeing with any part of what you wrote, so that's cool. You are applying what you said too, you're discussing with me instead of going to my profile to come up with your own obsessive theories. Honestly it seems like I agreed with everything you did and said. But you could always be lying, or not engaging in good faith I guess.

My guess is that you're trying to argue with me and change my mind, but I am just trying to have a basic discussion, I don't really mind admitting when we agree.