atidere
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198031717679
SteamID3 [U:1:71451951]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:35725975
Country United States
Signed Up February 16, 2013
Last Posted January 8, 2024 at 2:01 PM
Posts 518 (0.1 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input  
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
1 2 3 4 ⋅⋅ 35
#204 Palestinian Genocide in World Events
Wild_Rumpusatidereno i don't care about royally pissing off Israelis and no, square 1 was a british mandate ceding Palestinian land away which clearly wouldn't be the case
also i think anti arab sentiment is already plenty severe if you've been paying attention, better for them to not have a military and legal system, right?
And shute, i would also like the criminals tried but everyone else to hold hands and sing la dee da, but that wouldn't stop me from supporting peace on the victims terms. the Palestinian opinion is clear: from the river to the sea Palestine will be free and that should be the starting point

also please for the love of god if you're going to keep replying stop just presupposing that israelis have some special right to be there or that israels claim of being a jewish state in passing is righteous because I'm tired of having to check you on it every time

As I suspected, you are unserious, misinformed (not in totality but enough), and disingenuous. There is no reason for me to further respond to you regarding this topic. I wish you the best.

posted 10 months ago
#202 Palestinian Genocide in World Events
pajaroatidere I have a B.S. degree in Business Analytics (Data Science), and it is just my opinion that polls, surveys, market research etc, have tendencies to miss a particular audience/voice at times, and to eliminate this gap/void you need to match empirical evidence with anecdotal evidence that is verifiableyou have a business analytics degree and in the same breath you're rejecting widely accepted statistical sample sizes in favor of anecdotes

No, I am not rejecting this completely. I am just saying one with the absence of the other, you will likely come to inconclusive results! This is not controversial, or even a concept one needs higher education to understand. It's not to say that their study is completely inappropriate, it just doesn't really tell you much. More importantly, it doesn't answer very basic methodology and demographic questions like how was this specifically conducted (they mention the survey was conducted by the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research at the Israel Democracy Institute between October 24–26, 2023, but no mention of if this was in person/online/any other methodology)? In addition, it never discloses the demographics of the two groups (there are different races of both Israelis and Arabs), but how am I to know what these people's backgrounds are? It is quite common knowledge that someone from Tel-Aviv has a very different upbringing than someone from Jerusalem (~ about a 2 hour car ride) and both of those groups of people have even different upbringing than someone from Eilat. A criticism I've heard about Israelis over the years is their tendency to put all arabs in one bucket and label them all death-cult lovers and Islam is a death cult etc. How are you different from any of them right now? (I guess not specifically you pajaro, but anyone who would make these type of claims)

posted 10 months ago
#199 Palestinian Genocide in World Events
5unnyatidereEnzoDBAny Jewish person who thinks they have the right to pledge allegiance, become nationalized to a part of the world they have never been to and have no roots in, and move to said region that native people have been forced out of, is part of the problem. I'm not saying Jewish people have no right to live in the region, as that area has been home to people of all faiths, but every foreign settler is straight up playing a role in the genocide.There's no logical fallacies in what he said. EnzoDB is saying that if you are jewish, have never been to Israel and have no familial roots in Israel and move there, then you are complicit in the genocide of Palestinians. He even acknowledges that there exists jewish people with familial roots in the area, and you call it a fallacy? You should read what you are replying to carefully if you want to disprove someone's statement.

In general sample size of 600 and 150 is sufficient to make claims and that sample size has been used forever to great effect. Of course with more people you will get more accurate but at a certain point it becomes statistically negligible.

For the third point you said you didn't get, Wild Rumpus wants to show that the majority of Israeli's don't care that they are mascaraing Palestinians, something you said is a naive thought. To do this he broadly splits the Israeli population into two groups, people on the right and people on the left, and wants to show that each group doesn't care about Palestinian lives. In the poll he linked the 80% of the Israeli "left" trusts the IDF more than Netanyahu to lead the war, whereas the right it's only 41% that thinks that, with 29% being they trust both of the IDF and Netanyahu equally. In both cases none of them is a small minority, which is the ONLY acceptable answer if one actually cares about stopping the genocide of Palestinians, as they are both complicit in the genocide of Palestinians. This shows that both sides and also a majority of Israelis don't care about their genocide of Palestinians. This was the argument Wild Rumpus made, just a little clearer.

As for your bewilderment at people criticizing Israel and wanting to install policies and conditions that you think are the exact same but for the other side, I'm just as bewildered that you said you've followed this quite closely for literally half your life, yet the most you've put forth is milquetoast centrist videos, lack of reading comprehension and statistical knowledge, and no sources for anything. But that's not important, what is is that the policies you're confused by aren't the same for both sides, wanting to end settler colonialism in Palestine is not the same as wanting to colonize Palestine. For this a start is to read this article, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2535582 a very brief introduction to the history of Zionist Imperialism, which you can get for free through your unis library, or if you don't attend some unis will give out library cards for free which you can access stuff online, or pirate it.

To the first part of you replying to me replying to enzo (lol), I would read my reply above to Wild_Rumpus. A little redundant of me to repeat what I think is a misinterpretation of my original point.

About my questioning of the sample size, you identified the exact reason. Yes, I understand there are certainly cases where a similar sample size has been used for studies like this, however, from my experiences, this is not representative of the Israeli "left" or "right" for that matter. I am claiming that I don't think you can simply use this study and claim "see, they're all genocidal, every single one of them, even the liberals". That is categorically false. Please read https://www.btselem.org/, https://www.haaretz.com/.

To answer the last bit about being "milquetoast centrist". I don't believe anything I have claimed to say is controversial, and if that means I'm a spineless centrist in from your POV, then I must be doing a decent job at being a human being at the very least. Second, I don't recall making any disputable claims without putting forth evidence. If I didn't provide a source or citation for a claim I made, that is because it is a fact. The only thing I can think of that you would find this to be inappropriate is around the discourse of the study Wild_Rumpus shared. I am simply stating, that from my experiences in the past and present, this is not representative of how Israelis think ideologically, especially if you separate them by left and right. I have a B.S. degree in Business Analytics (Data Science), and it is just my opinion that polls, surveys, market research etc, have tendencies to miss a particular audience/voice at times, and to eliminate this gap/void you need to match empirical evidence with anecdotal evidence that is verifiable and can tell the whole story rather than fragments or segmentations. The study lacks that and that's ok, we can certainly still gather insights from it, but we need to also look at other information as well to form a more clear and concise conclusion that encapsulates a particular groups sentiments towards a subject rather than just two options one or the other.

posted 10 months ago
#197 Palestinian Genocide in World Events
Wild_RumpusatidereIt is of no fault because of the Palestinians of course, but many Jews who were expelled from their ancestral homeland went to Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Lebanon, etc, only to be kicked out of those homes again down the road on numerous occasions (most recently in 1948)This really fascinated me because you manage to invent the most bizarre circular logic to justify the existence of Israel. Antisemitism in the arab world, to be clear, is wrong. Yet not only is modern antisemitism a european phenomenon that the middle east adopted from them, but it was only adopted in reaction to how imperial britain was meddling in the region and zionist colonialism. You found a way to take antisemitism that flared up in reaction to zionism, not Jews, as a justification for Zionism!

Pretty sure you misinterpreted what I was claiming to be antisemitic. I was claiming that the fallacy is that there are Jews with no roots in the land that exist. Please read: https://www.pbs.org/wnet/story-jews/explore-the-diaspora/visual-timeline/ and visit https://fcit.usf.edu/holocaust/people/displace.htm to specifically where they migrated to. Obviously, there are certainly circumstances where there are converts who indeed do not have any historical roots, but those are a fraction of a small percentage that make up the religion. It is notoriously hard to convert to Judaism, as by Jews it is not seen as just some religious identity but also being part of an ethnic group as well. I feel like I have to say this again, I don't mean this as an indictment on anyone's character, it's just me pointing out the antisemitic trope that has been used time and time again.
atidereIt is again, in my opinion, quite naïve to think everyone in the IDF agrees with the likes of Netanyahu or Itamar Ben Gvir etc. the actual audacity to use the word naive while claiming surely the military apparatus and boots on the ground demolishing gaza and carrying out genocide have some disagreements with the government officials talking about how important it is to demolish gaza and ordering them to demolish gazaatidereMilitary service is mandatory, and you will be continually jailed if you refuse service/defy orders. Unless you leave the country (not many people do this or willfully accept jailing). So yes, I don't think it is as black and white as you make it out to be. I have had many experiences and conversations with many Israelis in both the past and the present and of many different backgrounds. I would say there are many differences among the different factions that lie on the zionist political spectrum, one of them being how/when they would handle Netanyahu for sure, but certainly not limited to that nor is that the biggest difference between the "left" and 'right".

I will say, that it never ceases to amaze me that people feel comfortable criticizing the Israeli government and its systems/policies, and with the same comfort level, they will then propose a solution that involves whatever they are accusing of the Israeli government of committing. It really is a phenomenon that I may never come to understand.

im assuming this is a soft argument against what i said here: Wild_RumpusJews lived in Palestine before zionism was invented and im sure they will live in Palestine after it is defeated. If you're asking if every Israeli citizen can rest assured that they get to keep going on as usual just under a palestinian state then the answer is no, settlers still need to be ousted from homes they dont own, war criminals and genociders still need to stand trial.in which case i couldnt have made a more illustrative example of liberal zionism myself because not only is it cloaked in a sense of moral superiority, not only is there an assumption of israel's legitamacy woven in, but it is completely and utterly devoid of even an attempt to understand the issue systemically, understand the power dynamics. If a woman is returned her purse would you call her a thief for taking it back after it's stolen? In what way is the return the homes and land of a people back to them the same as the original theft? They are the exact opposite

The point I was trying to make here is that does it not seem unattainable to achieve this without royally pissing off one group of people and ending back at square 1 all over again? Let's say the Palestinian refugees of America, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, etc. are allowed to return to their specific homes. Most certainly there will be instances where Israelis will be forced to move. Would this not bring severe anti-arab sentiment in the region? Regardless if you think the act is just or not, I think the most important aspect to keep in mind when it comes down to policy/legislature over the land is the future, peaceful coexistence of the Palestinians and Israelis. Maybe it's just my opinion that this wouldn't help that future relationship. In my opinion, a perfect world scenario where all nationalities receive the same rights and liberty as one-state, with the focus of being a safe-haven for Jews around the world AND the land where Palestinians have the right to return to their native land. There are three R's I think need to happen (famously quoted by an arab-israeli lawmaker) return, recognition, redistribution. I think whatever that encapsulates, has to be carried out carefully because the slightest mistake can lead to a misinterpretation, and that is when we have seen tense relations turn violent in some circumstances.

posted 10 months ago
#189 Palestinian Genocide in World Events
EnzoDBAny Jewish person who thinks they have the right to pledge allegiance, become nationalized to a part of the world they have never been to and have no roots in, and move to said region that native people have been forced out of, is part of the problem. I'm not saying Jewish people have no right to live in the region, as that area has been home to people of all faiths, but every foreign settler is straight up playing a role in the genocide.

A few fallacies in your point. First and foremost, Jews have a deep and rich history in the land. That is undeniable. I don't know why a Jew immigrating to the land (past, present, or future) has to have any association with forcing Palestinians out of their home. There should be a coexistence regardless of whether the governing body has a nationality behind it or not. I understand there are certain instances that which this has happened, and individuals must be held accountable for these actions, but to deny either group the right to self-determination is flat-out wrong, and that goes for all Jews too. I think people tend to discredit the expansiveness of the Jewish diaspora. It is of no fault because of the Palestinians of course, but many Jews who were expelled from their ancestral homeland went to Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Lebanon, etc, only to be kicked out of those homes again down the road on numerous occasions (most recently in 1948). I doubt that the descendants of those people, who make up at least 50% of the Jewish demographic in Israel are going to accept that they have to move again, especially because I couldn't point toward a direction where they would go. There is certainly no other home for them in the region, and I wouldn't argue many places in Europe are quite attractive to them.

Wild_RumpusatidereI guess our definitions of "liberal Zionism" are different. However, I don't think that is important to find out. If by Israel you mean Netanyahu and the Likud party (especially since he's retaken power), then I can't say you are far off. But if this is what you think the majority of Israelis think, it's just my opinion that that is a naïve conclusion to come to.Here is a group of public opinion polls in israel: https://en.idi.org.il/articles/51198 (this is an israeli organization so you could argue that they may overrepresent the popularity of the state's actions)

What i want to point out is that yes, netanyahu is unpopular among the israeli "left". But as this poll shows a main split between left and right is that the right wants to wait until the so-called war is over to figure out blame fot the "failure of october 7th" whereas the "left" doesnt (or rather still dows but just kinda less so".

Combined with the fact that an insane 80 PERCENT of the israeli "left" are more trusting of the IDF than netanyahu this clearly paints the grim picture that the Israeli "left" doesnt have a problem with the ongoing genocide, otherwise they would trust the idk carrying it out, but instead just dont like that netanyahu let oct 7 happen

so yes, liberal zionists are pretty much exactly like ive described. people who are truly anti-zionist tend to leave israel if able
atidere I've got to ask, do you believe that Jews around the world have a right to live there too if they choose to do so? Again, appreciate the responses.Jews lived in Palestine before zionism was invented and im sure they will live in Palestine after it is defeated. If you're asking if every Israeli citizen can rest assured that they get to keep going on as usual just under a palestinian state then the answer is no, settlers still need to be ousted from homes they dont own, war criminals and genociders still need to stand trial.

A few things here. First, the sample size of that study is quite low. I'm not sure you can conclusively say that this does/doesn't reflect the general opinion of the Israeli left. I mean ~600 Israelis were questioned and ~150 Arab Israeli were questioned. The third point I don't really get regarding the IDF. I mean that kind of makes sense does it not? The people who grew up in your communities and who you trained with are probably going to be the most you trust. It is again, in my opinion, quite naïve to think everyone in the IDF agrees with the likes of Netanyahu or Itamar Ben Gvir etc.

I will say, that it never ceases to amaze me that people feel comfortable criticizing the Israeli government and its systems/policies, and with the same comfort level, they will then propose a solution that involves whatever they are accusing of the Israeli government of committing. It really is a phenomenon that I may never come to understand.

To answer one of your earlier questions in this thread Enzo, to how could people derail such a serious and dire topic so quickly is quite simple. Firstly, I've got to say, your opinions about this topic reek of xenophobia and you have a tendency to play into a few of the common antisemitic tropes. Not to say I am the one who gets to decide how to judge your character, just an observation from your posts in this thread. Second, like someone correctly identified, Hitler joined the conversation by post #4. Shit was doomed as soon as he laid his eyes on this thread. I think most importantly though, there is little mention of Hamas's accountability and the one post of the October 7th denial from you Enzo (although the conversation certainly derailed way before that). But that is absolutely an inhumane thought.

posted 10 months ago
#186 Palestinian Genocide in World Events
Seinfeld
admittedly the second channel you linked is quite interesting, but the first video you posted reeks of narcissistic centrism. it doesn't require a lack of empathy for the lost lives of any israeli to be anti zionist. being pro palestine does not mandate the celebration of innocent lives lost. posters like the ones he is hanging up only serve to insert confusion and muddy the waters of what is a genocidal occupation of land that israel has no business occupying

I appreciate the response but a lot is going on here (don't mean to be some sort of grammar police, just a lot of ideas at once). I don't think that was the point of the video at all. I interpreted it as highlighting the ludicrosity of the ones who do claim it requires a lack of empathy to be pro-Palestinian/pro-Israeli (something very prevalent in the discourse over the last two decades). Maybe you could clarify your position or maybe I misinterpreted your original reply.

Wild_RumpusatidereVery insightful.i can appreciate that empathy is important but what you've shared is not an ideologically-netural enlightened stance, its just basic liberal zionism. there are plenty of nominally "left-wing" israelis and israeli politics that would tell you (in many cases sincerely) that loss of palestinian life is a tragedy and that they just wish they could live together in peace. that israel is a good place that happens to be doing bad things, and its existence is self-evidently just
but if you actually tease this ideology apart, if you actually inquire why israel has to push palestinians out rather than make them equal citizens, why israel is so adament about recruiting new settlers, or what they think of the right of return for palestinians (an internationally-recognized right) and you will be shocked how quickly the humanist appearcance switches to talks of demographic rates, arabization, and maintaining ethnic purity.
so no, i dont find this kind of stuff very insightful. because at best youll find people who will condemn the nakba or maybe even condemn the current genocide but who would be entirely resistant to rectifying them and at worst a well-spoken ethnic supremacist who cries crocodile tears as they continue to benefit from the erasure and cleansing of palestine

I guess our definitions of "liberal Zionism" are different. However, I don't think that is important to find out. If by Israel you mean Netanyahu and the Likud party (especially since he's retaken power), then I can't say you are far off. But if this is what you think the majority of Israelis think, it's just my opinion that that is a naïve conclusion to come to. I've got to ask, do you believe that Jews around the world have a right to live there too if they choose to do so? Again, appreciate the responses.

posted 10 months ago
#183 Palestinian Genocide in World Events

If you ever had a thought come across your consciousness about this topic along the lines of "Man I always knew this was a problem, but how the hell did we get here?", ironically this tftv thread reflects a lot of the issues regarding the political discourse of this topic. As someone who has followed it closely quite literally half my life, it was already to hear the main talking point be "I'm not very interested in getting into the politics of this one" but seeing it switch to "I'm not interested in hearing what anyone has to say other than those who agree with me" is discouraging, so I choose not to participate most of the time now. It seems as if most people are unserious in general and it probably isn't worth the time spent arguing to a brick wall.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAyrW0klQkM

https://www.youtube.com/@CoreyGilShusterAskProject/videos
- These two stories are quite interesting (although there are several more) because he gets stopped by Palestinians all the time because they are reluctant to record themselves speaking their mind freely at times: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GedfUH74-jk and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYWn2LfKeKg

But I recommend watching all the videos from Corey. Very insightful.

posted 10 months ago
#45 NFL 2022-23 season (brady STILL wont die edition) in Off Topic
atidereIf you told me that I was going to die before my Bengals won a playoff game, I would've believed it. Literally cried when they beat KC again. It still doesn't feel real, especially because these are the first 3 playoff wins I have ever witnessed as a Cincinnati sports fan. Who fucking Dey, if Joe Burrow wins us a Superbowl this city is burning to the ground! The media doesn't want to talk about it yet because it's Cincinnati, but they're going to attract major free agent O-Linemen, and Burrow to Chase is here for the next decade+. This is the start of a dynasty.

Doesn't matter if you flip a coin, make them play on the road, or put them up against top teams, the AFC runs through Cincinnati. Don't care if it's Mahomes, Allen, or Lamar, one thing is sure teams got to play us, and they are in Joe Burrow's way of that damn Lombardi trophy.

posted about a year ago
#91 2021-2022 NBA Season in Off Topic

warriors in 6/7

posted about 2 years ago
#57 2021-2022 NBA Season in Off Topic
mustardoverlordtojomustardoverlordBtw I know ill be called a hater for this but Marcus Smart winning DPOY is a total jokeu cant drop a take like that without saying who u think deserves it...
gobert still, draymond if he had played the whole season

would prolly put bam above him too

there's a limit to how impactful guard defense can be, even though smart is clearly the best guard defender in the league. the celtics are the best defense because almost every player in their rotation is an elite defender, not because smart is a one-man defense

I mean this explanation has some merit to it, as Rob Williams, JB, and JT are all very good at defense too, but I don't think him winning DPOY is a joke. If I were to pick a different candidate out of the top 3 it would've been Mikal Bridges due to him being able to guard both guards and forwards regardless of size.

posted about 2 years ago
#40 2021-2022 NBA Season in Off Topic

https://poeltl.dunk.town/

wordle but nba

posted about 2 years ago
#75 NFL THREAD 2021 BRADY WONT DIE EDITION in Off Topic

If you told me that I was going to die before my Bengals won a playoff game, I would've believed it. Literally cried when they beat KC again. It still doesn't feel real, especially because these are the first 3 playoff wins I have ever witnessed as a Cincinnati sports fan. Who fucking Dey, if Joe Burrow wins us a Superbowl this city is burning to the ground! The media doesn't want to talk about it yet because it's Cincinnati, but they're going to attract major free agent O-Linemen, and Burrow to Chase is here for the next decade+. This is is the start of a dynasty.

posted about 2 years ago
#44 Why did you take a break from TF2? in TF2 General Discussion

I loved this game as much as the next person, but I think the leading factors to why I quit the game is:
Losing time to play the game bc of college/work would never give me a consistent enough schedule to play the game as I did in high school.
Wanting to hang out with friends irl (didn't have many in high school)
The community was so toxic it just made the game less fun. Maybe it's different now, but everyone had to shit on each other, and idk about anyone else here but after playing almost 5000 hours of this game, shit adds up and you just stop booting the game up and find something else to do. To be completely honest I think everyone should quit this game at some point and never come back because I can guarantee a couple of things will happen. You'll probably get a job or get a better job and increase your wallet size, you will do things that make you happier (unrelated to $) and you'll live a healthier lifestyle. I could also never wrap my head around why the top players continue to play this game because it's literally b4nny just winning every season. I don't see the fun in that, maybe I'm completely wrong and have a shitty mindset/attitude towards that but it never made sense to me. Nonetheless, I am 1000% happier. I'm graduating from college in the spring and applying for full-time jobs, and I equate a good portion of my increase in happiness to quitting tf2 (and a lot of gaming in general).

posted about 3 years ago
#135 VALORANT in Other Games

I played 300 hours of cs and I've played like 200 games of valorant. The gun gameplay is nearly identical, with each respective game having its small differences, but if you played csgo, your gun skills will transfer quite easily (at least in my experience). I remember in csgo I climbed to MG2 (slightly above average at the time) just by gun skills, I never learned how to use grenades properly tbh. I always found the specific smoke throws very difficult to learn. However, in valorant, at least in my opinion, the abilities are really easy to learn, and no agent is super hard to learn (maybe excluding reyna). I will say, at first the abilities are kinda overwhelming to learn since there are a lot, and it feels like sometimes you might die to some dumb shit, but once you start learning what each and every agent does, you'll learn quickly how to not die to stupid shit constantly, and how to penalize your enemies. This game wants me to play csgo, but I kinda know in the back of my head that valve will never care, and it will be filled with hackers in mm, where Riot has put a pretty good anticheat system in afaik. My only complaint is the a. amount of squeakers bc its f2p, and b. the amount of time it took me to start climbing out of low elo was way too long, I would get Match MVP like 6 games in a row but still lose bc of bad teammates (but like this happens in every game tbh), but they just put a patch through to help rank distribution. Nevertheless, I think the game is pretty fun, and I think Riot is a way better company than Valve will ever be at video games. Riot is definitely new to first person shooters, so they're going to have to learn and improve, but they've done a pretty good job with league so far.

edit: sorry for bad grammar I'm lazy

posted about 3 years ago
#8 2020 US Election Called in World Events

pretty good birthday present. the cheeto was fired today.

posted about 4 years ago
1 2 3 4 ⋅⋅ 35