MGE scout v soldier isn't that realistic and its pretty hard in that kind of setting. A soldier just needs to hit 2 average 70-80 damage splash rockets to kill a scout. While the scout needs to land 3x 80 damage meat shots, or multiple lower damage shots all without dying.

In a normal match you want to play heals, play height advantage where its difficult for the soldier to splash you, and also play health packs. Position yourself so you can get a kit or escape the soldier if you think you are losing in the middle of a fight.

Practicing 1v1 Scout v Soldier in an isolated environment isn't exactly realistic. So don't feel bad if you get rolled.

I'd consider myself about the same on scout and soldier. I've 20-0'ed scouts as a soldier on MGE before only to have a reasonably close scout v scout game.

Cherrypicking, you mean like what you are doing with those verses?

https://www.gci.org/law/otlaws

TLDR Summary: The New Testament gives two basic answers to this question: Yes, and no. Some verses indicate continuity, and others indicate change.

Except for the fact that radical Muslims are estimated to represent 10-15% of all Muslims worldwide. Which would equal hundreds of millions of radical Muslims vs 100's of Westboro Baptist attendees.

Are you serious? Are you genuinely saying that Terrorism by Christians is happening a lot when compared to Islamist Radicals?

Forgive me for posting a long list:

These are all the Islamic Radical Terrorist attacks that have happened in ONLY the first 4 months of 2015. Amazing that this list of just 4 months is many times longer than your Christian terrorist list for the past decade.

These are all Old Testament references and many of the teachings and laws in the OT are outdated and no longer apply (e.g. slaughtering of goats to forgive your sins). And they are directed at specific people/people groups. These are not generalized statements to kill non-believers like what we see in the Quran.

I looked up one of them:

Deuteronomy 13:7-12 (This is under the law of Moses and people were not permitted to worship any other gods.) After trial, the penalty for worshiping other gods was stoning. And the first person to throw the stone was the person that caught the law breaker.

http://biblehub.com/commentaries/deuteronomy/13-9.htm

Does the Bible directly condone this type of activity in the same way the Quaran directly condones attacking non-believers. I don't think so.

Secondly, you are pulling up examples from hundreds of years ago. Do you have any modern 21st century equivalents from other religions that are so heavily involved in terrorism besides radical Islam?

KKK is a religious group interesting....

Please find me a list even 1/10th as long as the Islamic Terrorist extremist list posted above by any other religion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

Also please find actual religious writings which support terrorism of these other religions. I posted several verses from the Quaran above.

Yep its a big problem. Do a search on any other religion and the terrorist attack list is small or non-existent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism

-------------------------

The Quran also condones violence, especially against non-believers. I'll provide several verse examples taken directly from the Quran.

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."

I don't know how any Muslim believer could possibly discount these verses and say that they are not encouraged to be violent. If they are true believers of the Quran then they will fight and attack non believers.

http://qpolitical.com/someone-said-muslims-bad-woman-delivers-amazing-response/

Check out this video. Most Muslims are non-extremists, just like most Germans during WWII were not Nazi's and opposed the mass genocide of the Jews. The TLDW point of that video is that "The overwhelming majority is irrelevant" and that it is the extremists that are the ones we need to watch out for.

The biggest question is how do we distinguish the difference between a radical Muslim and a moderate? Do we wait until they commit a crime to determine their beliefs? Is there a way we can prevent terrorism while still allowing freedom of religion?

You guys have to remember that although Trump and some other Candidates may have some "crazy" ideas, the United States is not a dictatorship. Banning Muslims will never happen in this country. Keeping more of a watchful eye on them might happen. It's a 3 branch system of government. Because Trump wants to do this doesn't mean that will actually ever happen (if he was elected) it would need approval from Congress (House and Senate).

It's a fact that some Mosques have been breading grounds for Terrorists. France has already taken action and is closing some of the extremist Mosques that are proven to be encouraging radical Islam.

I do support the majority of Trumps policies though, but the Muslim one is a bit extreme. I fully support securing the US-Mexico Border and actually doing something about ISIS, our current president is unwilling to do anything but make bogus statements about them and their beliefs.

When only 1 member was an original member of Fryotech I agree, a new name should be used. But I do understand the logical reasons for keeping the name. Already have logos, merchandise, website, theme song etc.

But I wouldn't count the "new" Fryotech out yet. Even though they lost in the razor tournament, its worth noting that they did out frag Ascent 326 to 318. Not by a whole lot, but that just shows they put up a good fight and the DM is there. A little more team cohesion and who knows what could happen.

Wow.. RIP your resolution dude

No medic confirmed yet? I've seen them scrim with both Seymour and Indust.

With booties you can chain charges. But its also just the ability to sharply turn. It's so much easier for example to blind rush around the corner in hopes to meet up with a player, and most classes can't move fast enough to doge it.

I hate shields though because if you play an explosive class and are trying to kill the demo who has a full buff @ 265. Well you're going to need about 5 good rockets to kill him due to the added resistance. But by the time you land a couple rockets he just charged half way across the map to a 100 HP kit.

Panic Attack is a garbage weapon. I have no problems with it being allowed as I don't think anyone would ever use it.

Flying Guillotine and wrap assassin are troll bleeder weapons. Most people wouldn't use them in actual matches if they were allowed. But they are still annoying to play against. I feel they don't really contribute to the object of the game (to frag and then cap the next point), they are just annoying af.

Tide Turner is very OP and the fact that it provides quite a bit of blast resistance makes it much harder for explosive classes to kill.

Brass beast, well with the new buff you can no longer headshot a buffed brass beast heavy that is camping on last due to the 20% damage reduction. A brass beast heavy fully buffed would literally have the equivalent of 540 HP.

Gunslinger is cancerous especially against scouts. A mini sentry on the flank would make flank impassable by scouts, unless they use a couple pistol clips at a distance or wait for an explosive class to take it out. There are many places where it could be abused and placed in bushes and stuff and people wouldn't know where the hell they were being attacked from.

Cleaner's carbine I see no problem with it.

With matchmaking around the corner, competitive TF2 as we know it could be a very different experience with full unlocks.