kirbyhow did solace make invite without prior roster league history?
that rule only applies to divisions other than invite. new teams can be placed into invite.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561197981631699 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:21365971] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:10682985 |
Country | Rainbow Nation |
Signed Up | July 18, 2012 |
Last Posted | December 26, 2021 at 2:43 AM |
Posts | 1538 (0.3 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | 0Â |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
kirbyhow did solace make invite without prior roster league history?
that rule only applies to divisions other than invite. new teams can be placed into invite.
FYI IT WASN'T WHILE I WAS SLICING THE PEPPERS. I went to the bathroom later and guess i still had pepper juices on my hands.
should probably also mess with your equalizer once you get them to increase the bass on them. i had my hd555's forever and finally decided to turn up the low end on my equalizer and noticed a world of difference.
FFG/v/ is like the worst board on 4chan but ok
p. much this. /sp/ 4 lyfe
bmanTo Killing, you should have just picked Root in the beginning, nobody would have had a problem with it, and it was obviously your choice.
I doubt killing had anything to do with it. Someone did post on the cs go forums asking to vote for your team so you guys probably got a good amount of cs players votes which don't count.
mustardoverlordwhat if people paid premium just to vote but did it after the 48 hour window? uncool
They should have read the rule then and realized their vote wouldn't be factored into the total. Hey its better than what happened to my team back in s5 where we came in 2nd place in open and weren't even put into the invite poll, that was cool.
TorbullWe will be setting up a mechanism to address anyone who's computer parts were damaged through this process
interesting...
BlueberryVillainIncorrect, TFC thrived for a longtime, there was no LAN for the Platinum division, no money, no prizes, people played for the love of the game. TFC died eventually because it got old, valve stopped supporting it, times changed, and people moved on to other games. TF2s release sealed the fate.
sorry but that doesn't sound like a great situation to me. yes tfc may have sustained itself but i doubt it continued to grow. tf2 right now has been slowly but steadily growing over the past couple seasons with it being on the verge of its biggest season yet. if esea were to die that would change.
i don't see why the tf2 community is so up in arms over this. there has been ONE esea match played since the bitcoin thing was added. i highly doubt anybody from tf2 runs the esea client outside of matches so in all probably only 12 people were affected by this. the cs community has every right to be upset about this seeing as they use esea to scrim/pug but we don't. yes it was scummy of them to do but it really had no affect on most tf2 players.
downpourTF2 community getting mad about something and then not doing anything about it
WHERE HAVE WE SEEN THIS BEFORE?
what is there to do about it? unless someone fronts $10,000 to start their own league or the community decides to raise $10,000 every 4 months for a league then there is nothing to do. top teams play so they can play on lan. that is the incentive to be a top team. without the incentive of a lan finals i know personally that many top players would quit. without the game having high level competition it will die. lan is what attracts viewers; invite matches are what attract viewers. if people are talking about the best interest of tf2 then as bad as esea is it is the best thing we have.
wtf, does anybody from tf2 actually run the esea client outside of matches? i know this would affect CS players because they actually pug/scrim using the esea client but i doubt more than 5% of the tf2 community was affected by this, if that. seriously the people suggesting UGC as an alternative are clueless. if you think lpkane is a bad admin/owner then obviously you haven't been involved with UGC. infinite makes lpkane look like the most intelligent man in the world. CEVO wouldn't be able to sustain tf2's growth. tf2 needs lans to survive and right now ESEA is the only league that can offer a lan with enough cash prizes to let top teams be able to attend. sorry but there is no better alternative. if esea were to drop tf2 it would die. maybe not a fast death but a slow and painful one. top players would leave one after another until there was no skill pool left. this upcoming season of esea looks to be one of the biggest ones yet, if people care about the growth of the game then playing in esea is the one way to contribute to it.
what if you end up making lan? paying for a plane ticket from Australia?!
4 lan spots makes the most sense. it makes the regular season mean a lot more and makes every match matter.
gl to all im teams. please stay alive :3
synchrokaceI'd just be appreciative if we could get away from the whole gay=bad thing. We have a lot of words that mean bad. However, we also have a lot of words that mean good. For example, chocolate. No one will say that "Your jumps are like chocolate" if they are trying to shit talk. Or even words that are neutral. "You jump like a mailman." That just doesn't make sense. I want it to get to a point where if someone says "you jump like a faggot" people are like "that just doesn't make sense."
This is pretty much the most important and valid argument, and one nobody seems to understand when they say "don't be offended".
A lot of people have said "if we ban it, it gives people who use it more power"; this is just ridiculous. The only way this becomes a truth is if we turned words like "faggot" around to be positive things - you don't take negativity away with more negativity.
To the people who haven't experienced what it means to be hurt by these words (and this includes gay people who aren't offended when a hiding spot is "gay"), you should probably learn that your personal experience is never, ever going to be the same as someone else's.
The biggest argument in favor of tossing these words around seems to be "it shouldn't bother people because I _______" - what makes you the authority on what shouldn't be offensive, or what other people should or shouldn't feel? You ask for the freedom to say whatever you want, but then you say that other people don't deserve to be offended by what you say? If it's their choice to be offended by certain things, then it's your choice to be offensive - whether you mean it or not.
The point is, you have the choice to either say something that's potentially offensive and has negative connotations, or simply use a different word (which, really, how hard is that?) to express yourself. It really shouldn't be this difficult to understand.
If somebody is a bigot telling them to stop saying a word won't do anything. Bigots will be bigots and unless the word is literally made illegal then I doubt any campaign will stop them from saying it. The campaign is for LGBT rights, correct? It shouldn't be about people not using the word faggot. It should be about trying to make bigots see differently and stop being idiots.
I always hated high school campaigns for shit like this because half of the people participating in it don't understand what it should be about. They just want to be a part of something and act like they are making a difference. It reminds me of the anti-abortion campaign back in my HS where people put duck tape over their mouths and also refused to talk. It is by far one of the dumbest ways to go about raising awareness of something. How are people supposed to know your message if you can't tell it to them?