mp_falldamage 0?
the plugin posted above is notoriously unreliable
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198049289245 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:89023517] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:44511758 |
Country | Rainbow Nation |
Signed Up | April 8, 2013 |
Last Posted | July 24, 2025 at 9:57 PM |
Posts | 386 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | m3 e36 |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
mp_falldamage 0?
the plugin posted above is notoriously unreliable
jnki_aka_tungsteni assumed both of you are from NA and are part of esea open/IM circlejerk
not that just some retard skiddie circlejerk
fade-
u need to bypass the hostfps
wow nice exploit if it involves an sv_cheats bypass
strazyyyfade-lmaobox is bad and the dev is a retarded paster so i don't think he can even make one ROFLConVar* pPasted_Bypass = g_pConvar->FindVar( "sv_cheats" ) if(gConvars.misc_pastebypass > 1) { pPasted_Bypass->SetValue(1) }
here u go fade
nice globals
squidquintoshsquidevery time there is a mass shooting, the conversation turns to whether or not guns should be legal
the only issue surrounding guns in these cases is the ease in which mentally ill people can acquire them--normal, reasonable people should and should continue to have access to any reasonable civil liberties
you will not have an easy time convincing law abiding and mentally sound citizens that they should not be allowed to own guns, and that discussion is pointless anyways. the conversations that absolutely need to take place after tragic events like this is how people with serious mental illnesses can so easily get guns but so often people confuse these events as opportunities to make points about gun ownership in general.
do you have any idea what the expenses for psychological exams on people are? do you know how easy it is to fake your mental condition, and how much more expensive it would be to disprove those people?
so what do you suggest, doing all those psychological exams on everyone with gun ownership? in 2013, there were almost as many guns as people, 1 in 3 households have guns
i agree that the gun law debate needs to stop because people think they need to get guns while they're still available, what actually needs to happen is that the government needs to pay off every person to turn their guns in and rethink gun laws once and for all
this will probably damage the US economy, but you have the pick between giving people their so precious "freedom" or making it easier for mentally-unstable or undereducated people to cause firearm-related homicides
http://www.shootingtracker.com/w/images/a/a0/2015_Mass_Shootings.jpg
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/134DB/production/_85876097_homicides_guns_624_v3.png
http://everytownresearch.org/school-shootings/
http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-than-50-of-us-government-spending-goes-to-the-military/18852
i am curious how you think assessing the mental wellbeing of gun applicants is too expensive but 'damaging the US economy' to turn in every gun is not lol
also, you missed the point entirely and jumped straight to whether or not gun ownership should be allowed whatsoever. you know what? its too late to weigh in on that. there are too many guns and too many perfectly capable, law abiding citizens who own them. but there is actual room to improve the state of gun ownership in the united states by addressing the ease at which mentally ill people can acquire them.
so feel free to continue to suggest that every american turn in their guns--it will literally never happen, regardless of whether legislation would mandate it (it would never) the discussion has since moved on and people love to avoid addressing the real issue by talking about this crap
paying citizens off to turn in their guns is a one-time expense whereas several psychological exams on them are an every-day expense (or however you put it)
your point being that people should address the "real issue". the issue are mentally unstable and undereducated ones, but you have no imagination of the costs of your suggestions. im going to go ahead and say that 20 hours are barely enough to distinguish a mentally ill person from a normal one. do you know the hourly wage of a psychotherspist?
also, once word comes around that people have to get examined, a shitton of them are going to acquire another shitton of guns, just like everytime this shit is up for debate. plus, mentally-ill ones are likely to have family members or friends who are allowed to legally own guns. examining people makes it barely any harder for them to go on a spree.
take europe, black market guns are unaffordable for your average school shooter/neighbourhood criminal. gun licenses are only given out to some citizens that need them for their job or respected members of gun associations
does this make it impossible for anyone to go on a spree? no, but it definitely stops most from even bothering with it
SpaceCadetYou can find the source for a country collecting 400+ million guns?
bad reading comprehension? i said counties, not the whole nation
SpaceCadet
That said, I don't see how any logical person can just say things like "every person turn in their guns" or "ban guns". Some have even suggested that the government should go house to house and collect guns from residents.
.
done successfully in several counties before (i would give you the source if i could find it)
squidevery time there is a mass shooting, the conversation turns to whether or not guns should be legal
the only issue surrounding guns in these cases is the ease in which mentally ill people can acquire them--normal, reasonable people should and should continue to have access to any reasonable civil liberties
you will not have an easy time convincing law abiding and mentally sound citizens that they should not be allowed to own guns, and that discussion is pointless anyways. the conversations that absolutely need to take place after tragic events like this is how people with serious mental illnesses can so easily get guns but so often people confuse these events as opportunities to make points about gun ownership in general.
do you have any idea what the expenses for psychological exams on people are? do you know how easy it is to fake your mental condition, and how much more expensive it would be to disprove those people?
so what do you suggest, doing all those psychological exams on everyone with gun ownership? in 2013, there were almost as many guns as people, 1 in 3 households have guns
i agree that the gun law debate needs to stop because people think they need to get guns while they're still available, what actually needs to happen is that the government needs to pay off every person to turn their guns in and rethink gun laws once and for all
this will probably damage the US economy, but you have the pick between giving people their so precious "freedom" or making it easier for mentally-unstable or undereducated people to cause firearm-related homicides
http://www.shootingtracker.com/w/images/a/a0/2015_Mass_Shootings.jpg
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/134DB/production/_85876097_homicides_guns_624_v3.png
http://everytownresearch.org/school-shootings/
http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-than-50-of-us-government-spending-goes-to-the-military/18852
eeetho I guess other countries don't consider basic human rights like healthcare benefits but w/e
healthcare benefits? what
FlickerOr a Deathadder. You can't really go wrong with those
.
or maybe if you want to buy a new mouse every year because your LMB or scroll wheel break (unless you want to deal with their shitty RMA service)
if there isn't anything you didn't like with the g502 then just get another one, there's no outstanding technology in any other mouse, it's just grip, surface and aesthetic stuff or just extra money charged for the brand ((((RAZER))))
love quantic, here's another song
sennheiser hd280 (neutral sound, removeable cable, closed headphones) - $100
Fostex T50RP (not much base, but don't expect a high sound spectrum at that budget, also closed headphones) - $100
Sennheiser HD518 (ok sound, removeable cable, open headphones) - $60
if you have a problem with glasses you might as well get IBMs or on-ear headphones (all of the above are over-ear)
Audio-Technica ATH-WS55 - $80
AKG Q460 - $100
AKG K619 - $90
don't know much about these but maybe you'll find an audio-technica in a local store and try it out
banned in etf2l
edit:
cirlohttp://www.teamfortress.tv/22021/remove-sniper-scope
it doesn't require dx9 afaik and as long as you don't use it in ETF2L it should be "fine".
(Otherwise you may be banned for script abuse or whatever the rule it's called)
cheating -> 1 year
Blitzoquintoshtf2 bhop servers run the bhop plugin, so it's 100x easier than css bhop.unskilledthere's a bhop server called rehopped which plays bhop maps, and you can do this as much as you wantif you want to play bhop maps you might as well do it on css since you barely get any speed from bhopping in tf2
css bhop servers also run bhop plugins, but unlike tf2, you don't have to do server-side calculations for speed input and speed output which is the 10% that #9 mentioned, since css actually has bhopping and you just write a plugin that lets you hold down space to jump every tick
said tf2 plugin is also very awful when you're playing with high ping (you notice it and it's very annoying)
also in tf2 there's some weird bug that lets you jump higher than intended, which a lot of people abuse and it's just stupid