you are allowed to question the process but it's not getting you anywhere because you just won't see the evidence regardless of how much it means to you. i already told you why we're not releasing it and that's not going to change in this case either. he's not going to prison and he's not locked up in a cell for an entire year where only we decide when he can walk around, when and what he's eating and when and who he can talk to at any point. he's not allowed to enter, that's it. no business will show you where their hidden cameras are and who their undercover people are who caught someone trying to steal shit from their store just because you just really want to know how they caught him. if you don't trust their decision you can feel free to move on and buy elsewhere.

except in that analogy it'd only be the business risking more damage from thievery by releasing their means to catch someone in the act and in etf2l's case it's you and other legit players who'd get to enjoy playing with/against better cheaters in the future. it seems you'd prefer that so don't ask other people why you're not allowed to question the process "suddenly"

there are multiple resources on the internet showing how cheaters are caught, so you're not asking for the evidence to learn from it

with the current resources we're working with the trade-off in transparency is actually more negative for us than it ever was. assuming it'd just be the 1500 something demos i've watched and the 6-8k the whole staff watched in total are going into a case, i'd personally not have an issue with providing transparency even if there'll still be a bunch of fanboys bandwagoning and denying evidence beyond reasonable doubt just because they love attention and circlejerking. but providing current transparency also means we'd have to leak proprietary or private tools and other resources only available to us that lead to cheaters getting banned a lot of the time. and then it's pretty easy to stay under the rader compared to "just don't track players through a wall if you're wallhacking cause it's super suspicious in demos and people will look for it"

either trust us or don't. but as far as i know, no other tf2 league has an anticheat this experienced and with access to private resources, which is why other leagues/sites mirror our bans

you must see how transparency can be abused and then come to the conclusion that there's not much benefit except for giving a couple people peace of mind

9.03 demo kinda slow tbh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WURSHMot-vY

https://streamable.com/pp3rwi

i used to have this issue except if i started a fullscreen game at any other point before restarting my computer it'd show whatever my desktop was the first time. think turning off windows 10 game mode fixed it for some people but mine fixed itself on win7 after a while

following nursey, mechawreck and heavythesquid drama: random, unprofessional people still don't follow any best practises on interviewing victims of child abuse/grooming, and then youtubers are still exposing who the victims are (them saying it's ok doesn't mean it will be ok), (some of) their conversations containing insanely personal information and declaring what types of pictures/videos were taken by whom and which people have them now.

this is actively hurting the victims' mental health and their ability to make the strongest case in a lawsuit that isn't also going to drag on much longer if people hadn't been so content-hungry on youtube/reddit

if some of them thought they were good samaritans by bringing this much detail to the public, especially in this case, they're fucking wrong

let professional people actually prepare proper interviews, probably following a psychological evaluation, instead of not caring about the consequences of these types of information being collected AND shared just for the clicks/upvotes

unfortunately the damage's been done already so reporting the video into oblivion is probably not going to change anything for the victim's sake

this didn't need another thread. next time check https://

https://clips.twitch.tv/PlausibleFreezingPhoneSoBayed

danielmm8888

L 08/24/1999 - 12:38:33: "TheTaint<60>" say "what the fuck is this happy birthday shit??????"

it doesn't, but admins probably don't have a massive spreadsheet that categorizes your mainclass, your team performance and individual performance in 6v6 and tells you which classes you can play in which divisions and which classes you can't play in which divisions.

can a 6v6 main mid soldier who did well in his losing team play low spy? if not, can a 6v6 main mid soldier who didn't perform well in his losing team? it's beyond arbitrary and subjective in most cases so they just check your experience against the div you want to play and that's it.

there aren't that many black and white cases where a majority would allow people in a division below without any penalty because people will constantly try to argue the validity of the admins' judgement.

"this solly got 8 airshots in this log (<a 0-3 product game on his 0-8 w/l team>) and hes allowed to play demo in low with no penalty????"

lol

pretty sure null-cancelling movement script was made by povohat