enigmahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
Insider info: he's been building up to this post for awhile.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198025826213 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:65560485] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:32780242 |
Country | Switzerland |
Signed Up | November 19, 2013 |
Last Posted | May 16, 2018 at 7:21 PM |
Posts | 372 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 1.15 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
1600 dpi |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
240 Hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Zowie FK1 |
Keyboard | CMStorm QuickFire Ultimate (MX Blue) |
Mousepad | Zowie GTF-X |
Headphones | Beyerdynamic DT880 Pro |
Monitor | Acer XF250Q |
enigmahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
Insider info: he's been building up to this post for awhile.
Quertcontrary to popular belief, all forms of entertainment are objectively quantified by setting standards reasonably fundamented on non-arbitrary attributes that constitutes the form of art in regard
and to be clear, objective values lies outside of one's perception of belief.
and then you might ask, how can art, which needs individual perception and it involves the connection with one's feelings, and therefore, subjectivism, be objectively measured?
by the zeitgeist theory, once aesthetic choices are accepted, the value of the work of art is determined by its capacity to transcend the limits of its chosen medium to strike some universal chord by the rarity of the skill of the artist or in its accurate reflection.
and by that, i mean something logical, fundamented not on distorted visions of ignorant subjectivism, but to a certain degree, a reasonably structured characteristic
there are a few examples of animes that can be deemed objectively good, by traits which are too long and complex for me to resume
for one to have the required sense of notion to perceive the objectively good traits you have to abide by to objectivism to understand quality distinction
Why do you have to show up and be 'that guy'? People like what they like, jfc.
Joe's crazy on Soldier, I'm sure he'd very fit well on a bubble team.
Glad this finally happened. It's been long overdue.
Durarara!!
Howl's Moving Castle
Parasyte: The Maxim
Patema Inverted
Tatami Galaxy
Steins;Gate
Hidighettofishnope, it didnt work, i think that is for spawining bots only, if they dont spawn in tr walkway, etc... this is a different issue :/
I'm getting the opposite problem with newbots and walkway in that bots aren't spawning at all. I was going to make a thread on that.
having the issue on p. much any tr map
-frag and move on.
I also enjoy not crashing when joining if the map's on Viaduct, or [the now miraculous] switching to Viaduct.
Only started recently about the time the DM servers went kaputt, so I'm going to take a guess there's probably a relation there.
Edit: can we just remove stickies as well? I was reminded very recently demos still set traps in DM, pretty dumb.
loljkTurinuhh Sociopaths and Psychopaths can plan and execute such attacks, not all mental illness completely incapacitates people. He, like every other mass murderer in history, is probably completely fucked mentally. However, this gives him no excuse as he was a racist who shot up a place. He deserves whatever punishment he gets, and it should be harsh.
My point is merely that calling someone crazy is less an explanation of why someone did something and more a judgement of whether you think their act was bad. Many intellectuals, artists, scientists, people who do exceptional things are extremely fanatical/anti social/ moody/ difficult/ strange but they are not deemed crazy because what they are doing is either harmless or in some cases beneficial to others. It just seems that in the colloquial sense the term 'crazy' is just an exclamation rather than an explanation for why people do the things they do. So there is no real worth in calling people crazy when they do heinous acts. Moreover if the shooter really was so obviously 'crazy' then someone would have taken steps to stop him before hand, but they didn't.
The difference between the said artists, intellectuals, scientists, and other extraordinary people whom are afflicted, and the murderer exists within the realms of abnormal psychology. Many of the artists, intellectuals, scientists, and others you referenced/how you referenced them are afflicted in some way by a psychological disorder or abnormality in thought processes. Practically defined, abnormalities are:
-Discomfort (physical or psychological discomfort)
-Deviance (unusual behavior)
-Dysfunction (inability to perform one's role)
-Maladaptive (harmful to self, or others)
It only takes one of these four terms for something to be considered abnormal.
The difference between those people, and the murderer is that they're not maladaptive - for sake of the explanation, let's say that they're not. They may be in discomfort, deviant, and/or dysfunctional in their roles, but they are not maladaptive, hence why they're not considered "crazy". If a person is maladaptive, they may not show any discomfort, deviance, or dysfunction which makes it possible that nobody will know their intentions, hence why people didn't take steps to stop this person's awful action
Even if a person is in therapy and a psychologist evaluates the individual, it's entirely possible for an individual especially if a psychopath or sociopath to lie, as both have a general lack of empathy, to give no ques of maladaptive intent.
Edit: fixed some typos...again.
d_bRainmanpretty clear its a statement on the ridic amount of gun crime in the us compared to any other 1st world countryCribbyA sad state of affairs.
Holy shit why would they even put this together
That's still fucked.
GetawhaleOh Jesus Christ can we close this before we get more people defending a fucking racist murderer because he couldn't help what he did because he has a disease? He intentionally killed black people and he said he did it to cause a race war. If you're defending him, you're part of the problem.
Nobody was defending the murderer for compulsiveness as part of a mental illness. Khaki said racism is a mental illness, but nowhere did he or anybody defend the murderer for racism. Whether the murderer were a psychopath or sociopath, etc., or not, does not make him exempt from being an awful person with terrible goals. There is no defending such an awful action, goal, or stigma.
loljkHow can it not be blamed on politics? The guy confessed to wanting to start a "race war" by his actions. The sooner people realize that you have to actually be quite sane to commit such heinous acts the sooner we can actually look at the real problems that create them. What I mean by quite sane is that he very deliberately planned out an attack on a very specific group of people for a very definite reason for a certain outcome. It wasn't random and it wasn't a heat of the moment kind of thing. People actually afflicted with mental illness are incapable of being cogent enough to plan and execute such an attack.
Few mental illnesses render people incapable of planning such an attack.
Red_everyone here is a god damn liberal
Fucking- out, out, OUT.
Earlier this year I saw a therapist, and got/recently changed meds which have helped w/ my anxiety, depression, and OCD. I'm not entirely sure who I was before, but from what I do know I don't like that individual too much.
Got a Nikon D3100, some equipment, and a few lenses to start learning about, and practicing different types of photography. Graduated from high school. Guitar lessons are starting to come together, to say. Starting to learn Korean. Finally learning to drive since I'll need a job soon.
So far, 2015's a year I can be proud of.
EoNomnificPowerful story, i don't understand why everyone here is treating it like a memeYou must be new to this website.
+1 omni, good bait