testing mat_queue_mode 2 against -1 in a 4 thread CPU, the difference is negligible
intel i5-2520M, integrated graphics, 640x480 fullscreen (low res to make it more CPU-dependant)
-novid -nojoy -nosteamcontroller -noff -nohltv -softparticlesdefaultoff -reuse -primarysound -snoforceformat

mat_queue_mode 2 //multi-thread
2639 frames 23.890 seconds 110.46 fps ( 9.05 ms/f) 6.817 fps variability
2639 frames 23.793 seconds 110.92 fps ( 9.02 ms/f) 6.853 fps variability
2639 frames 23.735 seconds 111.18 fps ( 8.99 ms/f) 6.568 fps variability
mat_queue_mode -1 //default
2639 frames 23.719 seconds 111.26 fps ( 8.99 ms/f) 6.838 fps variability
2639 frames 24.834 seconds 106.27 fps ( 9.41 ms/f) 8.448 fps variability
2639 frames 23.904 seconds 110.40 fps ( 9.06 ms/f) 7.280 fps variability
2639 frames 23.676 seconds 111.46 fps ( 8.97 ms/f) 6.918 fps variability

is there any way of making "timedemo" show the min FPS too?

if the bottleneck is the graphics card i guess using those settings would help, thats probably why its in the toaster settings

can you link your benchmark? whats your setup

it has true 8 physical cores, just with each 2 sharing the same cache.

yeah i didnt paste it correctly , in my launch options its okay
test with the -dxlevel 81 removed
normal

2639 frames 30.627 seconds 86.16 fps (11.61 ms/f) 6.341 fps variability
2639 frames 30.368 seconds 86.90 fps (11.51 ms/f) 5.972 fps variability
2639 frames 30.434 seconds 86.71 fps (11.53 ms/f) 5.929 fps variability

-r_emulate_gl

2639 frames 30.961 seconds 85.24 fps (11.73 ms/f) 5.903 fps variability
2639 frames 30.685 seconds 86.00 fps (11.63 ms/f) 5.718 fps variability

how would that launch opttion make TF2 "emulate" open GL anyway? is there more info on that command? openGL only seems to be allowed in linux for source games so idk - even tho it still shows mat_dxlevel on console when u run games on linux...

testing -r_emulate_gl on intel HD graphics, thought it would make a difference but nope
Wintel i5-2520m
intel HD 3000: ver 9.17.10.4229
launch options: -dxlevel 81 -novid -nojoy -nosteamcontroller -noff -nohltv -nouserclip -softparticlesdefaultoff -reuse -primarysound -snoforceformat

1280x720
2639 frames 29.230 seconds 90.28 fps (11.08 ms/f) 7.494 fps variability
1366x768
2639 frames 30.447 seconds 86.68 fps (11.54 ms/f) 6.768 fps variability
2639 frames 30.569 seconds 86.33 fps (11.58 ms/f) 6.483 fps variability
2639 frames 30.526 seconds 86.45 fps (11.57 ms/f) 6.363 fps variability

-r_emulate_gl

1280x720
2639 frames 29.399 seconds 89.76 fps (11.14 ms/f) 6.958 fps variability
1366x768
2639 frames 30.556 seconds 86.37 fps (11.58 ms/f) 6.452 fps variability
2639 frames 30.552 seconds 86.38 fps (11.58 ms/f) 6.632 fps variability
2639 frames 30.563 seconds 86.35 fps (11.58 ms/f) 6.376 fps variability

well what am i supposed to say? i think the ledge on that fence improves game flow and is a nice movement aid
also the rocky wall thing next to balc is a way better hiding spot than the ledge in balcony itself idk why the latter is removed
if you want to remove everything that is "odd map design" or "non intended by valve" the ledge on valley and the top of tube in last should be out too

i would preffer if the spire fence ledge was still there, maybe making it somewhat more visual

Anything + Anchovies

on what basis are ledges going to be removed? the one in valley is ok but the ones in balcony and spire are not?

garbuglio back?

French servers

WOOPS, totally missed that last paragraph, udpated !

Updated the files with some conservative changes listed by mastercoms
http://timfortress.today/pages/fps.html
changes can be found here

had a dream were i was falling from a 100meter tall bridge that was built in top of a huge waterfall that had loads of rocks at the bottom
when i was about to hit the rocks i hit the floor IRL

Some more general feedback from lobby:

Too many flanks
Too many dropdowns
Hard to push out of last
"Middle" routes to mid are too chokey and tight (the lower dungeon and the cave on top of it)
Spawn exits are cumbersome