Yes, that would work. That would make the wave joke reality instead of a joke. The sound is a mechanical wave whose starting time and therefore the wave function itself is determined by a quantum wavefunction (mathematician at heart, if you haven't noticed yet).
Who said you couldn't connect classical mechanics and quantum physics?

#11
You got the first one right but you missed the joke on the second one.

EDIT: You might have missed the hidden "wave" joke aswell.

Let's add some Schrödinger: The tree is in a superposition between falling and not falling, what happens to the sound?

And even more important: What is the trees spin/Does it's spin change before/while/after falling?

I fail to see the difference between hardware accel (not skipping, prediction etc., that really is bs) and software accel. Some people just don't like accel, some are fine with it. You can call it preference.
A mouse that isn't terribly flawed will neither make you better nor worse.
You just tell everyone that "Newer Zowie mice (AM, FK, eVo series), G400/G400S etc are the only ones worth buying."

I would like to hear your objective view on mouse shapes because all hands are the same, right?

What if i told you, that there are players in prem/invite who use the G500 or "worse" mice?

m_rawinput 1 overrides these launchoptions.
It's called placebo effect.

1. Going by that logic you should buy single cores. Most applications are single-threaded anyway, so a multi-core CPU isn't worth it, right? You don't choose a CPU based on how much power is enough for most applications, you choose it based on how much you need for the most CPU-intensive application that you want to run.

2. AMD doesn't use logical cores at all.
Technically logical cores are what the OS uses and it's 8 logical cores for both the FX-8xxx and the i7s. The AMDs have 8 physical in 4 modules (similar to how intel built quad-cores by putting two dualcores in one package) and the i7s have 4 physical cores.
So technically what you said is wrong.

3. In theory one 256bit Intel core should perform the same as one AMD module when using 256bit instructions because the two 128bit cores in the module will be used together to process the 256bit instructions.
In theory the two 128bit cores in a AMD module should beat a 256bit Intel core when using <=128bit instructions because the intel core can only process one at a time.
The reasons why the Intel cores perform better are Hyperthreading and some other things which result in a vastly higher IPC.
Explanation for those who don't know what IPC are: Instructions per cycle, basically it processes more instructions at the same clock rate than AMD processors.

4. If you didn't want to go into technical jargon, you shouldn't have mentioned "logical cores".

OPs option are pretty much:
Your (comanglia's) build: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1kPhk
=Good overall performance in games
+SSD

The same without a SSD and a better GPU: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1lc3N
-no SSD
+even better performance in games

Or element's build without the SSD: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1lc4y
-no SSD
=Good overall performance in games (some worse and some better than comanglia's build)
+best TF2 performance

No, this is wrong.

The Intel CPUs do not actually have "logical cores", they report that they have logical cores which means that the OS can and will run threads on those logical cores. One core runs the threads of two of the cores the OS "thinks" it has. Hyperthreading basically doubles some parts of the core so two processes can be prepared for execution at the same time so as soon as the process that is currently running on that core has to wait for something (not going into the technical reasons), the other pre-prepared process gets executed instead of just waiting.

You can disable Hyperthreading via the BIOS/UEFI and voilá the intel CPU your OS only displays the 4 existing cores of your intel CPU.

AMD's CPUs are consisting of modules. Each module has two 128bit ALUs and two 128bit FPUs that can also be used together to process 256bit instructions. Intel Haswell on the other hand uses 256bit units.

tl;dr
Intel: each pair of cores shown in the OS = 1 core with some parts doubled
AMD: each pair of cores shown in the OS = one module = 2 cores with some parts shared

This
Some of the "shit tier" mice got placed there because of their lift off distance.

There are no i3 quad cores. It's a dualcore with hyperthreading (2 logical cores per physical core->better multithread scheduling than windows).

If you don't get >120 fps (preferably about 240) ALL THE TIME a 120Hz monitor won't help you. With 90 fps instead of 120 it would show one frame twice, the next only on time and the frame after that twice, then once and so on. Yes, that looks as awful as it sounds.

tl;dr
Don't get a 120Hz monitor if you can't get >120 fps all the time.

The price maybe?
The Haswell Dualcore haven't been released yet and the cheapest Quadcore costs 50 bucks more than the fx-6350.

#42 You don't need a Quad-Core aswell, why do people buy it? Because it's faster.
A 2.5" HDD in a ATX mid tower is just pointless, it's way more expensive than a 3.5" HDD. If you want to save money then go for a 5400rpm 3.5" 500 GB HDD and save 10$ compared to a 7200rpm 3.5" 1000GB HDD.

#32 120Hz monitor without >= 120 fps is pointless, an ok-ish GPU won't do that in newer games. And 2*250$ for two 7870s wasn't cheaper than 400$ (one 770) the last time i checked.

#33 4670K typo or 3570K memories? :D

#34 Streaming shouldn't be a problem for the 4670K at least not in TF2. Streaming performance might be better for some games on the FX-8350, but you'd sacrifice performance in some games (e.g. TF2) for better performance while streaming or in some other games. I don't think that an i7 is possible with that budget and you'd only see benefits from it IF you start streaming.
Btw lightboost works for AMD too http://www.blurbusters.com/zero-motion-blur/lightboost/

#35 5400rpm 2.5" HDD, i stopped reading.

#36 "i5 4*3.2GHz" and "asus motherboard" are probably the most specific details i've ever heard.

#37 Yes, this is the internet, everything is an argument.

#38 No, Yes and No

I don't think that changing the hitsound volume affects the server time.

#8 In the first movie the round timer and actual time are not in sync. It's slowed down by about 20%. The servertime itself is slower, for whatever reason. Apparently only the listen server is affected since you moved normally on other servers.

Either way he doesn't want a low-end build he needs an ac or use liquid nitrogen, guess what's cheaper.