Ok ok all jokes aside, I know cheeto IRL and I genuinely believe he's a good kid at heart, not a bad person. All of the edginess and trolling seems like just a phase that he'll hopefully grow out of in the future, I encourage everyone to give him a second chance

dozen eggs

you have to be dangerously retarded to not realize it was a joke post

I should have added a /s for ppl like you, sorry dog my bad ..

Write over with Zeros, ..... random data overwrite 27 pass erase DoD Compliant (5220-22) 21 pass Secure Erase magnetic media

engineer class, so retarded

https://streamable.com/w12a1v

try cl_particle_batch_mode 1 if you have it on 2

tip for anyone looking for old tf2 files in the future, you can use https://github.com/SteamRE/DepotDownloader with manifest IDs from https://steamdb.info/app/440/ to download files from any version of tf2 ever released on steam

every time ive seen u in game ur going 2 and 40 on an uncledane pub …

In pure servers, instead of using the custom 1x1 textures from cleantf2+, the game reverts back to using the original tf2 textures but keeps the 1x1 scaling of the custom ones for some reason, so it's basically the original texture scaled down and tiled a bunch of times.

It looks pretty flat for most textures, but if the original texture is less uniform or looks far different on one edge than another edge, it'll look weirder and not as smooth. There isn't really anything you can do about it. On sunshine specifically, some of the textures lack lower res mips so that could explain why they behave differently.

they're not, he removed the option and posted about it a while ago https://tf.gg/post/1033132

go in dev/lists/flat.txt and dev/lists/flat_hl2.txt and delete the lines with materials\glass, then re run the generate script

if you're using the premade vpk instead of generating yourself, unpack it and delete the glass folder inside materials

I suppose I should have indicated somehow that I was responding only to the first question and not the second.

I use dd for OS migration, I have never had a single problem with it. Even my heaviest used ssd only has some 200 TBW, so I don't care about writing a few extra GB for an easy, convenient, reliable imaging method that always will work exactly how I expect it to. Are there situations in which using dd could be less than ideal? Indeed there are.

I didn't mean to argue about it, everything you have said is more or less correct.

I mean, he just asked what people use. dd is what I've used many times to clone OS installs since I find the hassle-free and headache-free nature of a bit-for-bit copy to be absolutely worth wasting whatever .00001% of an ssd's life on cloning free space. You're completely right about drive sizes though, a filesystem level tool would be better and easier if the destination drive is smaller, although there is the option of resizing partitions and then copying just the partitions and table with dd instead of the full drive.