IARENOBODYGrizzly Rage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wryRDVnimmY
God i just want to punch them all in the face.
Worst Movies Ever
posted in
TF2 General Discussion
[quote=IARENOBODY]Grizzly Rage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wryRDVnimmY[/quote]
God i just want to punch them all in the face.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wryRDVnimmY[/quote]
God i just want to punch them all in the face.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1034314/
Space Nazis...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1034314/
Space Nazis...
Space Nazis...
just saw the worst trailer in my entire life this is hands down the worst movie why sci fi why
just saw the worst trailer in my entire life this is hands down the worst movie why sci fi why [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XxuBIiFZKs[/youtube]
fieldsforrest gump is a terrible film because all it succeed in is making history whiter than it already is.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/nope1.gif
[quote=fields]forrest gump is a terrible film because all it succeed in is making history whiter than it already is.[/quote]
[img]http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/nope1.gif[/img]
[img]http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/nope1.gif[/img]
Cloud Atlas was pretty bad in my opinion. It went on for three hours, jumping around five different story lines in five different time periods, and for the love of god, one of the time periods was post-apocolyptic with people that spoke broken English, so my fiance and I only ever understood every fifth word. The movie has received reviews at both ends of the awesome-shit spectrum, but I honestly had a really bad time with it. It's a shame because some of the ideas were really interesting, or could have been.
The Twilight films are obviously not a favorite here, but I kind of wanted to say a wee bit about them.
Mostly, it's the fault of the directors, but at the same time, the books aren't paced in such a way that would make for good watching. Every installment is told in first-person, which never really seems to translate well into film. If you have read the books and can imagine an intense scene between Bella and the vampire(s), you'll probably realize that a good portion of the book is inner monologue. A lot of the conflict Bella faces is explored more in her head than she really says outwardly in the book or film. So what you're pretty much left with is angst and painful lack of interesting dialogue, in addition to no action because the book seldom had it.
I think the films make the books look worse than they are, although I know they're not award-winning material.
[b]Cloud Atlas[/b] was pretty bad in my opinion. It went on for three hours, jumping around five different story lines in five different time periods, and for the love of god, one of the time periods was post-apocolyptic with people that spoke broken English, so my fiance and I only ever understood every fifth word. The movie has received reviews at both ends of the awesome-shit spectrum, but I honestly had a really bad time with it. It's a shame because some of the ideas were really interesting, or could have been.
The [b]Twilight[/b] films are obviously not a favorite here, but I kind of wanted to say a wee bit about them.
Mostly, it's the fault of the directors, but at the same time, the books aren't paced in such a way that would make for good watching. Every installment is told in first-person, which never really seems to translate well into film. If you have read the books and can imagine an intense scene between Bella and the vampire(s), you'll probably realize that a good portion of the book is inner monologue. A lot of the conflict Bella faces is explored more in her head than she really says outwardly in the book or film. So what you're pretty much left with is angst and painful lack of interesting dialogue, in addition to no action because the book seldom had it.
I think the films make the books look worse than they are, although I know they're not award-winning material.
The [b]Twilight[/b] films are obviously not a favorite here, but I kind of wanted to say a wee bit about them.
Mostly, it's the fault of the directors, but at the same time, the books aren't paced in such a way that would make for good watching. Every installment is told in first-person, which never really seems to translate well into film. If you have read the books and can imagine an intense scene between Bella and the vampire(s), you'll probably realize that a good portion of the book is inner monologue. A lot of the conflict Bella faces is explored more in her head than she really says outwardly in the book or film. So what you're pretty much left with is angst and painful lack of interesting dialogue, in addition to no action because the book seldom had it.
I think the films make the books look worse than they are, although I know they're not award-winning material.
blueberrymuffinfieldsits ok if you -frag me for saying forrest gump but im yet to hear why its anything but an overrated piece of garbage
I doubt that it's the worst movie you've ever seen and we have yet to hear why you think a movie that won 6 Oscars and nominated for 7 more is an overrated piece of garbage
Seconding Blueberry. If you're going to demand to be proven wrong, you need to supply some points for your argument.
On another note, I felt that Forrest Gump's original form, a novel, was more enjoyable than the film (although in a bit of a different direction). A lot more humor, and more adventure with Forrest that we didn't get to see in the film. I preferred the film ending to the book ending, but the latter is kind of interesting.
[quote=blueberrymuffin][quote=fields]its ok if you -frag me for saying forrest gump but im yet to hear why its anything but an overrated piece of garbage[/quote]
I doubt that it's the worst movie you've ever seen and we have yet to hear why you think a movie that won 6 Oscars and nominated for 7 more is an overrated piece of garbage[/quote]
Seconding Blueberry. If you're going to demand to be proven wrong, you need to supply some points for your argument.
On another note, I felt that Forrest Gump's original form, a novel, was more enjoyable than the film (although in a bit of a different direction). A lot more humor, and more adventure with Forrest that we didn't get to see in the film. I preferred the film ending to the book ending, but the latter is kind of interesting.
I doubt that it's the worst movie you've ever seen and we have yet to hear why you think a movie that won 6 Oscars and nominated for 7 more is an overrated piece of garbage[/quote]
Seconding Blueberry. If you're going to demand to be proven wrong, you need to supply some points for your argument.
On another note, I felt that Forrest Gump's original form, a novel, was more enjoyable than the film (although in a bit of a different direction). A lot more humor, and more adventure with Forrest that we didn't get to see in the film. I preferred the film ending to the book ending, but the latter is kind of interesting.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365789/
My friends and I watched some of this on synchtube. Prettaayyyy prettaaayyyy prettyyyy pretty bad.
Zombie Nation was fucking awful, too. Don't know how my friends and I brought ourselves to watch that.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365789/
My friends and I watched some of this on synchtube. Prettaayyyy prettaaayyyy prettyyyy pretty bad.
Zombie Nation was fucking awful, too. Don't know how my friends and I brought ourselves to watch that.
My friends and I watched some of this on synchtube. Prettaayyyy prettaaayyyy prettyyyy pretty bad.
Zombie Nation was fucking awful, too. Don't know how my friends and I brought ourselves to watch that.
Fields is right Forest Gump does suck. The whole thing is conservative propaganda. With pretty much every historical malady being blamed on deviations from the values of the religious right.
Fields is right Forest Gump does suck. The whole thing is conservative propaganda. With pretty much every historical malady being blamed on deviations from the values of the religious right.
RenhetblueberrymuffinSeconding Blueberry. If you're going to demand to be proven wrong, you need to supply some points for your argument.fieldsits ok if you -frag me for saying forrest gump but im yet to hear why its anything but an overrated piece of garbage
I doubt that it's the worst movie you've ever seen and we have yet to hear why you think a movie that won 6 Oscars and nominated for 7 more is an overrated piece of garbage
On another note, I felt that Forrest Gump's original form, a novel, was more enjoyable than the film (although in a bit of a different direction). A lot more humor, and more adventure with Forrest that we didn't get to see in the film. I preferred the film ending to the book ending, but the latter is kind of interesting.
if you look at my other posts you can see my entire argument, im on my phone and dont feel like multi-quoting or whatever it is
[quote=Renhet][quote=blueberrymuffin][quote=fields]its ok if you -frag me for saying forrest gump but im yet to hear why its anything but an overrated piece of garbage[/quote]
I doubt that it's the worst movie you've ever seen and we have yet to hear why you think a movie that won 6 Oscars and nominated for 7 more is an overrated piece of garbage[/quote]
Seconding Blueberry. If you're going to demand to be proven wrong, you need to supply some points for your argument.
On another note, I felt that Forrest Gump's original form, a novel, was more enjoyable than the film (although in a bit of a different direction). A lot more humor, and more adventure with Forrest that we didn't get to see in the film. I preferred the film ending to the book ending, but the latter is kind of interesting.[/quote]
if you look at my other posts you can see my entire argument, im on my phone and dont feel like multi-quoting or whatever it is
I doubt that it's the worst movie you've ever seen and we have yet to hear why you think a movie that won 6 Oscars and nominated for 7 more is an overrated piece of garbage[/quote]
Seconding Blueberry. If you're going to demand to be proven wrong, you need to supply some points for your argument.
On another note, I felt that Forrest Gump's original form, a novel, was more enjoyable than the film (although in a bit of a different direction). A lot more humor, and more adventure with Forrest that we didn't get to see in the film. I preferred the film ending to the book ending, but the latter is kind of interesting.[/quote]
if you look at my other posts you can see my entire argument, im on my phone and dont feel like multi-quoting or whatever it is
fieldsforrest gump is a terrible film because all it succeed in is making history whiter than it already is. its littered with awful acting and is a prime example of americans ability to only enjoy movies with unrealistic happy endings
"Awful acting" is too subjective to be considered a valid argumentative point.
"Making history whiter than it aleady is" needs a lot more explanation for it to be considered a valid point, or even to be understood. As it is, I don't think anybody really understands your point of view beyond "field angry, field smash!"
fieldsyes, forrest gump finally gets the girl. yeah she has aids, but they both are old and will live out a period of their lives together. if you dont think thats happy then your standards are too high. La regle du jeu, sansho the bailiff, pulp fiction, the big lebowski, the birds, the shining, fargo, dr strangelove, and Das Cabinet des Dr Caligari are my favorite films. im sorry if you dont think the acting in those films is good
Forrest Gump doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending. It's defined as bittersweet because his lover died, but he has a child that he loves and gets to raise. You're assuming a hell of a lot about a good number of people you've likely never met when you try to say what they're capable of enjoying in a film.
I don't understand how that film list supports your argument or how it is relevant.
[quote=fields]forrest gump is a terrible film because all it succeed in is making history whiter than it already is. its littered with awful acting and is a prime example of americans ability to only enjoy movies with unrealistic happy endings[/quote]
"Awful acting" is too subjective to be considered a valid argumentative point.
"Making history whiter than it aleady is" needs a lot more explanation for it to be considered a valid point, or even to be understood. As it is, I don't think anybody really understands your point of view beyond "field angry, field smash!"
[quote=fields]yes, forrest gump finally gets the girl. yeah she has aids, but they both are old and will live out a period of their lives together. if you dont think thats happy then your standards are too high. La regle du jeu, sansho the bailiff, pulp fiction, the big lebowski, the birds, the shining, fargo, dr strangelove, and Das Cabinet des Dr Caligari are my favorite films. im sorry if you dont think the acting in those films is good[/quote]
Forrest Gump doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending. It's defined as bittersweet because his lover died, but he has a child that he loves and gets to raise. You're assuming a hell of a lot about a good number of people you've likely never met when you try to say what they're capable of enjoying in a film.
I don't understand how that film list supports your argument or how it is relevant.
"Awful acting" is too subjective to be considered a valid argumentative point.
"Making history whiter than it aleady is" needs a lot more explanation for it to be considered a valid point, or even to be understood. As it is, I don't think anybody really understands your point of view beyond "field angry, field smash!"
[quote=fields]yes, forrest gump finally gets the girl. yeah she has aids, but they both are old and will live out a period of their lives together. if you dont think thats happy then your standards are too high. La regle du jeu, sansho the bailiff, pulp fiction, the big lebowski, the birds, the shining, fargo, dr strangelove, and Das Cabinet des Dr Caligari are my favorite films. im sorry if you dont think the acting in those films is good[/quote]
Forrest Gump doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending. It's defined as bittersweet because his lover died, but he has a child that he loves and gets to raise. You're assuming a hell of a lot about a good number of people you've likely never met when you try to say what they're capable of enjoying in a film.
I don't understand how that film list supports your argument or how it is relevant.
Renhetfieldsforrest gump is a terrible film because all it succeed in is making history whiter than it already is. its littered with awful acting and is a prime example of americans ability to only enjoy movies with unrealistic happy endings
"Awful acting" is too subjective to be considered a valid argumentative point.
"Making history whiter than it aleady is" needs a lot more explanation for it to be considered a valid point, or even to be understood. As it is, I don't think anybody really understands your point of view beyond "field angry, field smash!"
fieldsyes, forrest gump finally gets the girl. yeah she has aids, but they both are old and will live out a period of their lives together. if you dont think thats happy then your standards are too high. La regle du jeu, sansho the bailiff, pulp fiction, the big lebowski, the birds, the shining, fargo, dr strangelove, and Das Cabinet des Dr Caligari are my favorite films. im sorry if you dont think the acting in those films is good
Forrest Gump doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending. It's defined as bittersweet because his lover died, but he has a child whom he loves and gets to raise. You're assuming a hell of a lot about a good number of people you've likely never met when you try to say what they're capable of enjoying in a film.
I don't understand how that film list supports your argument or how it is relevant.
yikes, tf.tv community and making film arguments personal. incredible, anyway, awful acting is just barely subjective, if you've read movie reviews awful acting is often a point taken into whether a film is a good or not. As for the ultra-conservative, white man's burden ideals shown by Forrest Gump's "pureness" of character can be seen throughout the entire film in nearly every situation regarding the black man. they even make the black panther party appear as pretentious, young and naïve is just ridiculous and un-called for. this will be my last post in this thread because my vacation just started and i'm trying to relax, but feel free to add me on steam to continue the argument, thanks.
[quote=Renhet][quote=fields]forrest gump is a terrible film because all it succeed in is making history whiter than it already is. its littered with awful acting and is a prime example of americans ability to only enjoy movies with unrealistic happy endings[/quote]
"Awful acting" is too subjective to be considered a valid argumentative point.
"Making history whiter than it aleady is" needs a lot more explanation for it to be considered a valid point, or even to be understood. As it is, I don't think anybody really understands your point of view beyond "field angry, field smash!"
[quote=fields]yes, forrest gump finally gets the girl. yeah she has aids, but they both are old and will live out a period of their lives together. if you dont think thats happy then your standards are too high. La regle du jeu, sansho the bailiff, pulp fiction, the big lebowski, the birds, the shining, fargo, dr strangelove, and Das Cabinet des Dr Caligari are my favorite films. im sorry if you dont think the acting in those films is good[/quote]
Forrest Gump doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending. It's defined as bittersweet because his lover died, but he has a child whom he loves and gets to raise. You're assuming a hell of a lot about a good number of people you've likely never met when you try to say what they're capable of enjoying in a film.
I don't understand how that film list supports your argument or how it is relevant.[/quote]
yikes, tf.tv community and making film arguments personal. incredible, anyway, awful acting is just barely subjective, if you've read movie reviews awful acting is often a point taken into whether a film is a good or not. As for the ultra-conservative, white man's burden ideals shown by Forrest Gump's "pureness" of character can be seen throughout the entire film in nearly every situation regarding the black man. they even make the black panther party appear as pretentious, young and naïve is just ridiculous and un-called for. this will be my last post in this thread because my vacation just started and i'm trying to relax, but feel free to add me on steam to continue the argument, thanks.
"Awful acting" is too subjective to be considered a valid argumentative point.
"Making history whiter than it aleady is" needs a lot more explanation for it to be considered a valid point, or even to be understood. As it is, I don't think anybody really understands your point of view beyond "field angry, field smash!"
[quote=fields]yes, forrest gump finally gets the girl. yeah she has aids, but they both are old and will live out a period of their lives together. if you dont think thats happy then your standards are too high. La regle du jeu, sansho the bailiff, pulp fiction, the big lebowski, the birds, the shining, fargo, dr strangelove, and Das Cabinet des Dr Caligari are my favorite films. im sorry if you dont think the acting in those films is good[/quote]
Forrest Gump doesn't have a happy ending or a sad ending. It's defined as bittersweet because his lover died, but he has a child whom he loves and gets to raise. You're assuming a hell of a lot about a good number of people you've likely never met when you try to say what they're capable of enjoying in a film.
I don't understand how that film list supports your argument or how it is relevant.[/quote]
yikes, tf.tv community and making film arguments personal. incredible, anyway, awful acting is just barely subjective, if you've read movie reviews awful acting is often a point taken into whether a film is a good or not. As for the ultra-conservative, white man's burden ideals shown by Forrest Gump's "pureness" of character can be seen throughout the entire film in nearly every situation regarding the black man. they even make the black panther party appear as pretentious, young and naïve is just ridiculous and un-called for. this will be my last post in this thread because my vacation just started and i'm trying to relax, but feel free to add me on steam to continue the argument, thanks.
fieldsits ok if you -frag me for saying forrest gump but im yet to hear why its anything but an overrated piece of garbage
m8 u started this circlejerk
[quote=fields]its ok if you -frag me for saying forrest gump but im yet to hear why its anything but an overrated piece of garbage[/quote] m8 u started this circlejerk
This is a clip from the best worst movie I've ever seen, Jesus Christ: Vampire Hunter
This is a clip from the best worst movie I've ever seen, Jesus Christ: Vampire Hunter
http://youtu.be/0IblzBerSFk
http://youtu.be/0IblzBerSFk
fieldsyikes, tf.tv community and making film arguments personal. incredible, anyway, awful acting is just barely subjective, if you've read movie reviews awful acting is often a point taken into whether a film is a good or not. As for the ultra-conservative, white man's burden ideals shown by Forrest Gump's "pureness" of character can be seen throughout the entire film in nearly every situation regarding the black man. they even make the black panther party appear as pretentious, young and naïve is just ridiculous and un-called for. this will be my last post in this thread because my vacation just started and i'm trying to relax, but feel free to add me on steam to continue the argument, thanks.
Excuse me, but how did I say anything personal about you, Fields? I don't think that if I were to reread my words that I would find anything similar to "Fields is a butthead." I honestly don't know what you're taking offense to, I literally said, in layman's terms, that you need to elaborate and that opinions don't make for valid points.
Awful acting is subjective. Tom Hanks isn't a beloved actor by many for no reason, yet you claim he's terrible. There's no solid fact to argue because the whole topic is one big opinion fest. Unless you're going to pull up a big textbook of how to act, you aren't going to be able to provide anything remotely factual.
It's not about Gump's purity, it's about being indifferent to the hardships and differences of the people around him, and reaching through to make close companions. It's just about loving unconditionally, which is really exemplified by his relationship with Jenny.
Bubba was just a guy looking for fortune so he could better support his family. Believing in his dream and ability isn't really what being pretentious is. If you're looking for a pretentious character I guess you could look at Lieutenant Dan, but he's really just a dude who's been through hell and seen some shit.
[quote=fields]yikes, tf.tv community and making film arguments personal. incredible, anyway, awful acting is just barely subjective, if you've read movie reviews awful acting is often a point taken into whether a film is a good or not. As for the ultra-conservative, white man's burden ideals shown by Forrest Gump's "pureness" of character can be seen throughout the entire film in nearly every situation regarding the black man. they even make the black panther party appear as pretentious, young and naïve is just ridiculous and un-called for. this will be my last post in this thread because my vacation just started and i'm trying to relax, but feel free to add me on steam to continue the argument, thanks.[/quote]Excuse me, but how did I say anything personal about you, Fields? I don't think that if I were to reread my words that I would find anything similar to "Fields is a butthead." I honestly don't know what you're taking offense to, I literally said, in layman's terms, that you need to elaborate and that opinions don't make for valid points.
Awful acting [i]is[/i] subjective. Tom Hanks isn't a beloved actor by many for no reason, yet you claim he's terrible. There's no solid fact to argue because the whole topic is one big opinion fest. Unless you're going to pull up a big textbook of how to act, you aren't going to be able to provide anything remotely factual.
It's not about Gump's purity, it's about being indifferent to the hardships and differences of the people around him, and reaching through to make close companions. It's just about loving unconditionally, which is really exemplified by his relationship with Jenny.
Bubba was just a guy looking for fortune so he could better support his family. Believing in his dream and ability isn't really what being pretentious is. If you're looking for a pretentious character I guess you could look at Lieutenant Dan, but he's really just a dude who's been through hell and seen some shit.
Awful acting [i]is[/i] subjective. Tom Hanks isn't a beloved actor by many for no reason, yet you claim he's terrible. There's no solid fact to argue because the whole topic is one big opinion fest. Unless you're going to pull up a big textbook of how to act, you aren't going to be able to provide anything remotely factual.
It's not about Gump's purity, it's about being indifferent to the hardships and differences of the people around him, and reaching through to make close companions. It's just about loving unconditionally, which is really exemplified by his relationship with Jenny.
Bubba was just a guy looking for fortune so he could better support his family. Believing in his dream and ability isn't really what being pretentious is. If you're looking for a pretentious character I guess you could look at Lieutenant Dan, but he's really just a dude who's been through hell and seen some shit.
Please
sign in through STEAM
to post a comment.