Can you explain how "Everything you said is irrelevant or wrong / based on nothing" or does a legitimate response come under one of those "private tools" you have

Oscar Pistorious never cheated!
#freepistorius

Collaide im not going to argue with you because you are legitimately stupid, youve proven this time and time again and theres no point in me outright doing a back and forth with you, this is the last time I will write in this thread. Everything i said is based off things i have personally experienced or have seen happen and the majority of it has relevance to someone being banned for cheating. Stop being a neanderthal and crawl back into your dark little cave, you contribute nothing to any thread you post on.

There are 2 things that I enjoy:

1. People malding at each other.
2. Reading the fallout a couple of days later.

how's collaide stupid? You are just rude.

THE CART WILL NOT MOVE ITSELF

https://i.imgur.com/QPJuAAv.png

i wish i had a thread this big dedicated to me :(

pingas

Ban Count : 2

you have so far only rephrased what sprite/dafuq said and accuse me of not contributing to the convo?

theres a reason why you as a player is mostly known for being toxic

hvh me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apANX0_qlr8

You have responded nothing and insulted people.

Literally not one of your responses have you actually said anything that doesn't stonewall the investigation.

Sprite. Me and (mostly) others have answered your queries. Every single one of them.

They are all answered. You ignored them.

Stop pawning responsibility off onto others,You haven't provided me any actual response. I want a response from you to backup the claims you keep making that i'm supposed to believe for no reason, I haven't once insulted you in the context of this discussion. when you talk like you are above others and dismiss their opinion for no reason and don't warrant any response, It's hard to take you seriously anymore.

And if you wanna go down the road of insults I'm sure I can find much worse things said by you and your friends that are toxic and malicious.

Watch out ETF2L, if u keep banning sniper mains u might inadvertently create the perfect league.

Yo sprite how did it feel when wizat sucked ur nob

https://i.imgur.com/3vMYYzi.jpg

#78 #82 #84 #91

try reading

Ah yes, all the posts where you didn't provide YOUR response.

https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/1618437098300658081/04FC51AC4A0C6777AB89B7A8CF630FA74ED0FC1D/

Yak you look better with this haircut it just looks like youre on of those cold, distant introvert types which doesn't suit your previous style. Like I will catch you in some sorta independent cafe and youre reading a book whilst wearing round framed glasses, That's all. Forget what Sprite is on about there because its ok to change styles.

the same people who cry about "muh evidence" are also the ones who believe tyler mcvicker is behind the bots in casual. Didn't need any evidence to believe that bs straight up, heh?

This is my last response to you Sprite.

1. Why are you grandstanding about insults?

You complained about me insulting you. I then provide claims that you use insults often. Somehow you want to then shift over the conversation to a war about who used the most and worst insults.

Dude, I don't care. Insult me, message kn and tell him to insult me too, do whatever you'd like. You insulting yak's appearence just proves that you are a dishonest hypocrite and that you faked concern about insults only when they're about you and your friends.

2. Why are you so obsessed with me giving you answers? Is there any legitimate reason why you require me to rephrase Clark's and quintosh's points and give them to you again? Why is it not okay for me to literally quote them? (Like I did in post #82)

3. Why do you keep saying that I have "never answered you" or "contributed to the conversation"?
You have IGNORED ME every single time.

• In post #78 I asked you to specify what exactly you didn't believe in Clark's post. You still haven't done it. You then fail to comprehend the simplest of logic: "I didn't disbelieve it". Yes sprite, you can in fact not believe in what clark said and at the same time not disbelieve it. It's called "not being sure", or "not knowing". And "not knowing" also falls under the definition of NOT BELIEVING. So, what exactly do you not believe?
  
• In post #78 I stated that the integrity of the AC team is far greater than the integrity of the convicted cheater. To this point of the conversation you have not demonstrated that there is an ounce of bias in the AC-process, nor have you demonstrated even a single wrongful conviction.
  
• In post #82 I asked why you're arguing if you don't disbelieve. You then distort it as me saying "You're not allowed to speak up on this matter". This is re-writing the meaning of the words I used. This is a strawman argument. You didn't comment on this either.
  
• In post #82 I said that "You saying that it's based on guesswork shows you actually have no idea how cheaters are caught lmao." You have not demonstrated an ounce of knowledge of any of the methods that the AC-staff in etf2l use. It's not based on guesswork, it's based on proof.
  
• In post #91 I actually did rephrase Clark's and quintosh's statements for you. In my own words. It's a direct response. You dismissed it for no reason what so ever.

This is proof that, even outside of my quotes of Clark and quintosh I have directly adressed your arguments.

4. You keep going back to the same argument. You haven't publicized the proof of him cheating. (I also tried to demonstrate this to you with the flow chart but it looks like you didn't understand it.)

Me, samski, quintosh, and Clark, and others, have tried to tell you the reasoning behind why the proof is not published, and why certain tools are not published. You have ignored it every time and just rephrased/restated your belief that "You haven't publicized the proof, therefore he shouldn't be banned / considered guilty".

It's evident you actually haven't understood the reasoning, and you have not tried to come up with a counterargument either.

1. I'm grandstanding about insults because It is childish and unnecessary, I'm not here to insult you stop thinking that I am, I never denied insults in the past but the context is completely different here.

2. Because YOU keep avoiding the questions, Clark and quintoshs' response don't actually give any proper explanation or evidence that contributes to the decision, I have asked on multiple occasions in this thread for even public sources, and have failed to have been provided them.

3. I will make a verdict once I have actually seen evidence with my own eyes, This is how any logical investigation should go, If you can't tell me why he's a hacker then I fail to see how you can justify a ban.(#78.1) I do not believe there is any of the special equipment specified in the posts and still have yet to see any of the public evidence against him being provided and cited properly. (#78.2) What "integrity" It's your word against his, how many of the admins on the AC team have actually been there for a long time and have a proven track record for catching hackers? And when you wont even provide the evidence how can I possibly prove any admin bias, other than the conundrum itself here. (#82.1) As stated earlier, I will make a verdict once provided with enough information, Why are you so hellbent on forcing a decision here? There is enough people in the community that doubt the decision that it could be taken under further review. I'm arguing it for the sake of due process and justice as well as a fair, transparent trial where there is no shred of doubt. (#82.2) You haven't provided any either. "it's based on proof" so show me. (#91) You drew a flowchart that echoed the same avoidant answer you've provided in every response.

4. I keep going back to the only fucking thing that actually matters, THE PROOF THAT HE IS HACKING? I don't see how you fail to understand how this is a crucial part of all of this, There has been ZERO evidence provided that he is hacking both public and private.

There is no need for a counterargument because you don't want to indulge in any of the things that've been requested to actually justify anything.

how anyone thinks making fun of someones appearance is a good comeback is beyond me

ah yes, but the homophobic remark was acceptable. I see :)

shame

show me on the doll where he didn't touch you ;)

Thanks for the words of encouragement bro but my hair got shaved for an initiation in January and was back by late March, back to the old style now, definitely feels much more me

Also sprite aren't u obese why u making fun of ppls appearance