The Clinton's not only will go down to a RICO investigation... But there is evidence of child sex ring tied to Epstein. This is why the FBI re-opened the case...Stay tuned kiddos.. . Grab your popcorn!
Donald Trump
posted in
World Events
The Clinton's not only will go down to a RICO investigation... But there is evidence of child sex ring tied to Epstein. This is why the FBI re-opened the case...Stay tuned kiddos.. . Grab your popcorn!
Nub_Danishnazis were the socialist party of Germany and markets are simply based on supply and demand so it does adjust rationally, it's just so complex and based off of so many different peoples decisions of what to buy and what to sell that it seems random and is impossible to measure, just because you cant understand it doesn't mean its random.
As I said, facile.
[quote=Nub_Danish]nazis were the socialist party of Germany and markets are simply based on supply and demand so it does adjust rationally, it's just so complex and based off of so many different peoples decisions of what to buy and what to sell that it seems random and is impossible to measure, just because you cant understand it doesn't mean its random.[/quote]
As I said, facile.
As I said, facile.
In actual election news (sorry, I know we're mostly here to disseminate the most infantile and flimsy propaganda imaginable) Trump's developed an actual chance of winning over the last week. 538 has Nevada on the cusp of going Republican and just New Hampshire or Colorado would need to fall for a potential Trump win
http://i.imgur.com/ETxpcvv.png
Given that tens of millions of votes have already been cast in a much more Trump hostile climate current trends might not impact the result as you might expect, but there's definitely a path to victory for Trump now whereas two weeks ago there was nothing. I don't think the smears on Clinton's assistant are likely to cut the mustard though.
In actual election news (sorry, I know we're mostly here to disseminate the most infantile and flimsy propaganda imaginable) Trump's developed an actual chance of winning over the last week. 538 has Nevada on the cusp of going Republican and just New Hampshire or Colorado would need to fall for a potential Trump win
[img]http://i.imgur.com/ETxpcvv.png[/img]
Given that tens of millions of votes have already been cast in a much more Trump hostile climate current trends might not impact the result as you might expect, but there's definitely a path to victory for Trump now whereas two weeks ago there was nothing. I don't think the smears on Clinton's assistant are likely to cut the mustard though.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/ETxpcvv.png[/img]
Given that tens of millions of votes have already been cast in a much more Trump hostile climate current trends might not impact the result as you might expect, but there's definitely a path to victory for Trump now whereas two weeks ago there was nothing. I don't think the smears on Clinton's assistant are likely to cut the mustard though.
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/790987682528628736
it's safe to say that after this election, journalistic integrity is dead
I mean come on this was already absurd as is, and now Hillary's camp is complaining about Comey's honesty over him not being transparent on Hillary's emails and how he's somehow a russian plant??? They praised him when he didn't recommend indictment and when he reopened the case he'll probably commit suicide with two shots to the back of the head soon
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/790987682528628736
it's safe to say that after this election, journalistic integrity is dead
I mean come on this was already absurd as is, and now [b]Hillary's camp[/b] is complaining about Comey's [b]honesty[/b] over him not being [b]transparent on Hillary's emails[/b] and how he's somehow a russian plant??? They praised him when he didn't recommend indictment and when he reopened the case he'll probably commit suicide with two shots to the back of the head soon
it's safe to say that after this election, journalistic integrity is dead
I mean come on this was already absurd as is, and now [b]Hillary's camp[/b] is complaining about Comey's [b]honesty[/b] over him not being [b]transparent on Hillary's emails[/b] and how he's somehow a russian plant??? They praised him when he didn't recommend indictment and when he reopened the case he'll probably commit suicide with two shots to the back of the head soon
Looking forward to the "Phase 3" E-Mail dump from WikiLeaks. Popular opinion seems to think the third and final phase is going to be emails from Clinton's personal account and not her assistant/campaign team. Kinda sad so many people have voted already considering all the information has not been made available yet.
Looking forward to the "Phase 3" E-Mail dump from WikiLeaks. Popular opinion seems to think the third and final phase is going to be emails from Clinton's personal account and not her assistant/campaign team. Kinda sad so many people have voted already considering all the information has not been made available yet.
With the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.
With the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.
GentlemanJonWith the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
[quote=GentlemanJon]With the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.[/quote]
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.[/quote]
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
SpaceCadetGentlemanJonWith the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.
[quote=SpaceCadet][quote=GentlemanJon]With the current poll situation if Wikileaks has anything truly explosive to publish then there's a good chance that it will swing the election in Trump's favour. However I think if they had the ammo they'd have used it already. It doesn't make sense to indulge in such brinkmanship with an election date, if manipulating the election is their agenda they'd want to allow time for the Trump campaign to properly exploit the material and disseminate it's most lurid interpretations.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.[/quote]
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.[/quote]
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.
Time is running short for something like that to come together coherently. Although there'd be an initial feeding frenzy it wouldn't support the kind of sustained development of an attacking narrative the Trump campaign would want. If they do have the emails and their contents were disappointingly benign then a late release might make sense - the longer Wikileaks waits the less likely they are to contain anything new or interesting, or of course the less likely they have them at all.[/quote]
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.[/quote]
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.
ibkfapsSpaceCadetThat could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.
Wouldn't that mean that Trump is more transparent (what people want) and Clinton is secretive and wants to cover-up everything she has done (what ppl don't want)?
[quote=ibkfaps][quote=SpaceCadet]
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.[/quote]
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.[/quote]
Wouldn't that mean that Trump is more transparent (what people want) and Clinton is secretive and wants to cover-up everything she has done (what ppl don't want)?
That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I think the biggest impact possible would be for Clinton to get elected amid all this building controversy then have a sitting president get charged with a crime and possibly put on trial and impeached.
The big question is "why would WikiLeaks want to help Donald Trump win?". They don't seem to have any dirt on him, at least no dirt on the level of Clinton so who knows.[/quote]
People questioned wikileaks on why they have no dirt on Trump and their answer was that there is nothing they can leak that is more controversial than what Donald Trump says on a daily basis.[/quote]
Wouldn't that mean that Trump is more transparent (what people want) and Clinton is secretive and wants to cover-up everything she has done (what ppl don't want)?
Yr defense of trump could be interpreted as him being too stupid to cover up the sketch shit hes done
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
Yr defense of trump could be interpreted as him being too stupid to cover up the sketch shit hes done
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
eeeThe real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
[quote=eee]
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
SpaceCadeteeeThe real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
It's impossible at this point, it's either the bitch or the clown
[quote=SpaceCadet][quote=eee]
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
It's impossible at this point, it's either the bitch or the clown
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
It's impossible at this point, it's either the bitch or the clown
SpaceCadeteeeThe real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
Dont vote for assholes
Educate yrself before the general
Stop supporting the GOP when they try to support divisive and obstructive candidates, even locally
Stop believing in conspiracy theories and actually pursue genuine issues with the candidates like policy
[quote=SpaceCadet][quote=eee]
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
Dont vote for assholes
Educate yrself before the general
Stop supporting the GOP when they try to support divisive and obstructive candidates, even locally
Stop believing in conspiracy theories and actually pursue genuine issues with the candidates like policy
The real goal should be elect someonw who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
Dont vote for assholes
Educate yrself before the general
Stop supporting the GOP when they try to support divisive and obstructive candidates, even locally
Stop believing in conspiracy theories and actually pursue genuine issues with the candidates like policy
SpaceCadeteeeThe real goal should be elect someone who hasnt done bad things
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
You know there are other candidates apart from Hillary and Trump right?
Anyways, honestly I don't care who wins but I have discussed that with my dad and we agreed that
1. Trump is doing this mostly for exposure, so whether he wins or loses the election he still wins...(LOL)
2. If Trump is elected, he will probably quit halfway through his 1st term(BUT PLS don't let him...make him finish what started for ONCE! The dude has declared bankruptcy more than 3 times!)
[quote=SpaceCadet][quote=eee]
The real goal should be elect someone who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
You know there are other candidates apart from Hillary and Trump right?
Anyways, honestly I don't care who wins but I have discussed that with my dad and we agreed that
1. Trump is doing this mostly for exposure, so whether he wins or loses the election he still wins...(LOL)
2. If Trump is elected, he will probably quit halfway through his 1st term(BUT PLS don't let him...make him finish what started for ONCE! The dude has declared bankruptcy more than 3 times!)
The real goal should be elect someone who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
You know there are other candidates apart from Hillary and Trump right?
Anyways, honestly I don't care who wins but I have discussed that with my dad and we agreed that
1. Trump is doing this mostly for exposure, so whether he wins or loses the election he still wins...(LOL)
2. If Trump is elected, he will probably quit halfway through his 1st term(BUT PLS don't let him...make him finish what started for ONCE! The dude has declared bankruptcy more than 3 times!)
As far as exposure goes trump shot himself in the foot considering his businesses are down quite a bit year over year
Also the whole pedophilia/rape thint
As far as exposure goes trump shot himself in the foot considering his businesses are down quite a bit year over year
Also the whole pedophilia/rape thint
Also the whole pedophilia/rape thint
eeeAs far as exposure goes trump shot himself in the foot considering his businesses are down quite a bit year over year
Also the whole pedophilia/rape thint
Yeah
Also, another thing I don't is the complaints about Hillary being shady.
If she is shady, then the CIA is pitch black
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra (This is pretty messed up)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking (even more messed up that there's a movie about it it's called 'Kill The Messenger')
[quote=eee]As far as exposure goes trump shot himself in the foot considering his businesses are down quite a bit year over year
Also the whole pedophilia/rape thint[/quote]
Yeah
Also, another thing I don't is the complaints about Hillary being shady.
If she is shady, then the CIA is pitch black
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra (This is pretty messed up)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking (even more messed up that there's a movie about it it's called 'Kill The Messenger')
Also the whole pedophilia/rape thint[/quote]
Yeah
Also, another thing I don't is the complaints about Hillary being shady.
If she is shady, then the CIA is pitch black
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra (This is pretty messed up)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking (even more messed up that there's a movie about it it's called 'Kill The Messenger')
ibkfapsthen the CIA is pitch black
WOW
Who would have thought?
[quote=ibkfaps]then the CIA is pitch black[/quote]
WOW
Who would have thought?
WOW
Who would have thought?
An organisation that runs a ton of black ops doing dark stuff? That is completely unexpected.
I mean there's 3 rules:
1. If you're an intelligence service no one should know about anything you don't want them to know.
2. It's not illegal if no one one knows it happened.
3. As long as no one can prove you did it you can still get away with it.
Anyway, since no one made that joke yet I'll have to do it.
With Oleg Popov dead Trump is now the greatest clown on the planet.
An organisation that runs a ton of black ops doing dark stuff? That is completely unexpected.
I mean there's 3 rules:
1. If you're an intelligence service no one should know about anything you don't want them to know.
2. It's not illegal if no one one knows it happened.
3. As long as no one can prove you did it you can still get away with it.
Anyway, since no one made that joke yet I'll have to do it.
With Oleg Popov dead Trump is now the greatest clown on the planet.
I mean there's 3 rules:
1. If you're an intelligence service no one should know about anything you don't want them to know.
2. It's not illegal if no one one knows it happened.
3. As long as no one can prove you did it you can still get away with it.
Anyway, since no one made that joke yet I'll have to do it.
With Oleg Popov dead Trump is now the greatest clown on the planet.
Screwballibkfapsthen the CIA is pitch blackWOW
Who would have thought?
So an organization with many hidden agendas and secrets is doing an investigation on a person to find their hidden secrets and agendas.......................................make 'A LOT' of sense
And you missed my point why do Americans complain about one person when their whole government is in on it.
[quote=Screwball][quote=ibkfaps]then the CIA is pitch black[/quote]
WOW
Who would have thought?[/quote]
So an organization with many hidden agendas and secrets is doing an investigation on a person to find their hidden secrets and agendas.......................................make 'A LOT' of sense
And you missed my point why do Americans complain about one person when their whole government is in on it.
WOW
Who would have thought?[/quote]
So an organization with many hidden agendas and secrets is doing an investigation on a person to find their hidden secrets and agendas.......................................make 'A LOT' of sense
And you missed my point why do Americans complain about one person when their whole government is in on it.
ibkfapsSpaceCadeteeeThe real goal should be elect someone who hasnt done bad things
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.
You know there are other candidates apart from Hillary and Trump right?
inherent flaws in the electoral college means that the two biggest parties are the only parties. there wont be a third party president anytime soon
[quote=ibkfaps][quote=SpaceCadet][quote=eee]
The real goal should be elect someone who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
You know there are other candidates apart from Hillary and Trump right?
[/quote]
inherent flaws in the electoral college means that the two biggest parties are the only parties. there wont be a third party president anytime soon
The real goal should be elect someone who hasnt done bad things[/quote]
Since you are so much smarter than the rest of us, I am sure you know how to accomplish that.[/quote]
You know there are other candidates apart from Hillary and Trump right?
[/quote]
inherent flaws in the electoral college means that the two biggest parties are the only parties. there wont be a third party president anytime soon
tftv, what do you think about this video that is showing hillarys conspiracy? will she ever stand up after taking such hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ
tftv, what do you think about this video that is showing hillarys conspiracy? will she ever stand up after taking such hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ
SpaceCadetThat could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.
I'd have thought his agenda was pretty transparent - get out of the Venezuelan embassy.
The only question is how he thinks the US election plays into that. If he doesn't merely espouse the theory that the US is behind the Swedish case against him but genuinely believes it then I imagine Trump would be his only real chance of the accusations being lifted.
By this point both major parties and their senior politicians and officials in the US will be quite happy to see him put behind bars so I'd have thought backing an outsider and helping him as much as possible would be his only way out of the situation. Even if the Swedes did drop the charges he's still broken laws in the UK that could see him detained and therefore extradited so he's in need of quite a bit of help.
[quote=SpaceCadet]That could all be true but the most important factor is that nobody knows what agenda WikiLeaks is working in this case.[/quote]
I'd have thought his agenda was pretty transparent - get out of the Venezuelan embassy.
The only question is how he thinks the US election plays into that. If he doesn't merely espouse the theory that the US is behind the Swedish case against him but genuinely believes it then I imagine Trump would be his only real chance of the accusations being lifted.
By this point both major parties and their senior politicians and officials in the US will be quite happy to see him put behind bars so I'd have thought backing an outsider and helping him as much as possible would be his only way out of the situation. Even if the Swedes did drop the charges he's still broken laws in the UK that could see him detained and therefore extradited so he's in need of quite a bit of help.
I'd have thought his agenda was pretty transparent - get out of the Venezuelan embassy.
The only question is how he thinks the US election plays into that. If he doesn't merely espouse the theory that the US is behind the Swedish case against him but genuinely believes it then I imagine Trump would be his only real chance of the accusations being lifted.
By this point both major parties and their senior politicians and officials in the US will be quite happy to see him put behind bars so I'd have thought backing an outsider and helping him as much as possible would be his only way out of the situation. Even if the Swedes did drop the charges he's still broken laws in the UK that could see him detained and therefore extradited so he's in need of quite a bit of help.
tojoThis election is Hilary's 100% and no amount of ignorant white people can get trump in office.
Why do you feel the need to be racist about this?
[quote=tojo]This election is Hilary's 100% and no amount of ignorant white people can get trump in office.[/quote]Why do you feel the need to be racist about this?
Nub_Danishhttps://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
hire me
[quote=Nub_Danish]https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803[/quote]
hire me
hire me
This thread has been locked.