b4nny: valve
muselk: blizzard

not worth reading, i think most of it was petty personal insults

funke: dead game

I honestly hate that people seem to really think that just because I don't enjoy how the game is being treated I somehow think the game's dead (I know you're goofing but people legitimately fear this)

the "twitter beef" was b4nny accusing me of being 5/5 of his silly list and every time I asked for an example he just responded "g-go look yourself you'll find it eventually...." muselk wasn't involved at all besides pointing out b4nny's obvious logical fallacy

Why did he put you on his silly list in the first place? Also I heard that myself shit talked b4nny about somethin. Got any links to the whole twitter convo?

fade on sight

https://mobile.twitter.com/4G_b4nny/status/817794244844756992 B4nny made a checklist didn't involve funke in any way, funke replies something snarky, B4nny replied back equally as snarky, funke gets triggered, Scott jaw and muselk join in, shit goes down

what does b4nny mean by "mountains of evidence"? its probably a simple answer but I'm retarded half of the time.

http://puu.sh/ttYuQ/27f1e344c0.jpg

http://puu.sh/ttYvt/c2f4e3f2b5.png

http://puu.sh/ttYvZ/96762fefd1.png

http://puu.sh/ttYF3/89491d0e68.png

http://puu.sh/ttYFX/660ebbdda2.png

http://puu.sh/ttYLj/934b514db4.png

http://puu.sh/ttYzQ/44058bebb9.jpg

edit: please leave robtheawsm

b4nny's initial tweet was in response to this

jesus why are people so upsetti

why are you guys fighting again?

If I'm not mistaken B4nny made the checklist, you felt obliged to respond to it, B4nny responded back, you got incredibly defensive and you guys argued like children

More like banny retreated from discourse on a site where people were disagreeing with him to try to call someone out to a group of "followers" much more likely to be positively receptive.

*and there's nothing wrong with that, but the argument followed him.

don't put people on your silly list, that's just absurdly rude

subtweets smh

I wasn't defensive at all. I asked him to share evidence, and if he did, i'd concede my hypocrisy. And he went on to never have a shred of evidence.

You take every minor comment so personally Jesus Christ, B4nny was being immature, absolutely nobody would have known it was you he was talking about, and absolutely nobody would take his tweet seriously, like actually stop entertaining him if he's "a fucking child" as you do eleoquently put it.

I didn't respond to him because I was afraid of public shame, I responded to him as one peer to another genuinely interested in his logic. Not everything has to be considered "drama".

You made a snarky comment to his meme of a post, and when he reposnded equally snarky it's quite obvious that you took it as more than a joke, it's a petty B4nny post, no need to clench your ass cheeks over it

wrong thread my b

I'd be compelled to believe you if he hadn't responded multiple times solidifying it as a very real opinion of his.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/003/382/icon.jpg

You didn't need to respond in the first place, that's the point I'm trying to make. It's like a 5yr old going up to you and calling you ugly, and then you spend the time to write a 2000 word essay explaining why you aren't ugly and then expecting the 5yr old to care

So then don't read it. I'd have DM'd him but you can't DM someone who doesn't follow you. And I wouldn't compare "evidence please" to a 2000 word essay. A bit of an over-exaggeration, no?

http://i.imgur.com/cc89En3.png

Not true, it just means that his DM settings are to followed-only. You can set your DM's to public.

Yes it is an exaggeration that was the point of the analogy, the point of the analogy is that you shouldn't care about what B4nny says about you he is literally the only one who thinks that and absolutely nothing will change because of it

With that mindset we may as well let verbal bullies everywhere in the world do as they please, since it's only their opinion and clearly don't need to be called out for their reprehensible actions.