CoD tournaments get like 10k viewers tops. (Which, sadly, is about 5 times the amount we get.) I don't see it going anywhere unless they release a free multiplayer and throw fucktons of money at it. (Hello Riot)

How can a game with aim assist be competetive

Don't we get 4k at LAN?

cod4 never forget

Like I said on the other CoD post, this ain't eSports. The game just doesn't have that competitive feel to it.

until they stop coming out with a new CoD every year (i.e. NEVER) it won't be a "real" eSport

haha panzer has top comment

i thought consoles could only produce 60fps... WHAT USE IS THAT BENQ TO THEM

mind blown

Its only right that TCM gaming took second place in whatever tournament was previewed in this

Anyone thinking games on console can be competitive at all.

How delusional do you have to be.

"They use joysticks, we use controllers" HOW DO I COMPUTER IN 2012 GUYS?

http://youtu.be/1ayKTSCC3NQ

Bunch of elitist faggots on this forum man holy shit
Sure, call console games uncompetitive all day but the moment you pick up that controller and start playing you're going to realize you're absolute shit

I'd like to point out that playing on the PC made using a controller extremely easy. Plus my awareness rose to see the pull on aim assist.

Not all console games are bad though, look at the fighting games, those are fun. But FPS games on a console have been dumbed down. As for halo, the game is crap, the crosshair isn't centered and makes look down and strains the eyes to look down.

Of course playing fps would make you better at fps. What do you expect?

To say console fps is dumbed down is fine, because it is. But a limitless skill ceiling still obviously exists. A non-player from the outside would say the PC players are more skilled because of the refined control, whereas all of the console players are on an even playing field, and don't have the same peripherals available; thus they are as skilled as they can be, just as the PC players are. A game isn't "crap" because you cant control it as fast and as accurately as you want. If that was the case, PC games are "crap" because I can't control them with my brain and never miss a shot. It doesn't make any sense.

the only decent chance cod had at becoming competitive was cod4 and now nobody plays it anymore

controller_goddess

cod2 is still the best of the fish.

Watching competitive gaming on PC is like NASCAR. Watching it played on consoles is like watching the respective cars that the NASCAR's are named after raceing.

No one wants to see a bunch of FWD V6 family sedans Drive around slowly. They want to see big powerful RWD V8's going 200 MPH.

LOL I GOT THE TOP COMMENT HAHAHA

Noticed that too, it's weird. Technically, they should be using this thing:

http://gaming.benq.com/gaming-monitor/rl2455hm

But the video shows XL2420Ts.

How do controllers with dead zones and competitive go together? :(

sports games...?

Try playing without a dead zone on your controllers.

It's really awful.

1. controllers.
2. auto aim
3. Kids
4. wtf is this

I imagine you could do 360 noscopes without even trying

also fighting games, i wish capcom wasn't dominating the fighting game scene so hard atm though ;_;

To be fair they have some great devs, even if their DLC plans are up the butt.

It's good that keeping it competitive is more important to them than running a cash shop, but I'm surprised they don't sell more costumes or stages as DLC instead.

i like how both of the top comments are from tf2 players.