sure why not?

I wish we could still see downfrags on threads man. Worst change ever.

haha. WOW. that would be totally bonanas!

:D

[quote=Saltysally1]I wish we could still see downfrags on threads man. Worst change ever.[/quote]
you can sort threads by "top" under a certain timeframe to see where a thread falls between known minus frag quantities (dumpstered threads).

[img]https://i.imgur.com/p3HJUMI.png[/img]

for example, if we sort by "top" over the last month and go to page 8, we see that this thread falls between "rate my racism" by griff (-20) and "an very important question" by griff (-23). therefore this thread has a rating between -20 and -23.

but wait! we can narrow this down even further by using our own vote to manipulate things. by downfragging "rate my racism" it achieves a downfrag total of -21, and if we reload the page, this thread is now ranked higher than "rate my racism."[b] therefore this thread must have -20 downfrags at the time of writing [/b](through some unthorough testing i found that if a thread is updated to receive the same number of downfrags as another thread, it will not move in the rankings, ruling out the possibility of this thread having a rating of -21)

[img]https://i.imgur.com/R8N7uge.png[/img]

this is a good post

i like garvield and i like lasange ( his favourite food)

[quote=gibus][quote=Saltysally1]I wish we could still see downfrags on threads man. Worst change ever.[/quote]
you can sort threads by "top" under a certain timeframe to see where a thread falls between known minus frag quantities (dumpstered threads).

[img]https://i.imgur.com/p3HJUMI.png[/img]

for example, if we sort by "top" over the last month and go to page 8, we see that this thread falls between "rate my racism" by griff (-20) and "an very important question" by griff (-23). therefore this thread has a rating between -20 and -23.

but wait! we can narrow this down even further by using our own vote to manipulate things. by downfragging "rate my racism" it achieves a downfrag total of -21, and if we reload the page, this thread is now ranked higher than "rate my racism."[b] therefore this thread must have -20 downfrags at the time of writing [/b](through some unthorough testing i found that if a thread is updated to receive the same number of downfrags as another thread, it will not move in the rankings, ruling out the possibility of this thread having a rating of -21)

[img]https://i.imgur.com/R8N7uge.png[/img][/quote]


thanks gibus, this is very helpful

[quote=griff][quote=gibus][quote=Saltysally1]I wish we could still see downfrags on threads man. Worst change ever.[/quote]
you can sort threads by "top" under a certain timeframe to see where a thread falls between known minus frag quantities (dumpstered threads).

[img]https://i.imgur.com/p3HJUMI.png[/img]

for example, if we sort by "top" over the last month and go to page 8, we see that this thread falls between "rate my racism" by griff (-20) and "an very important question" by griff (-23). therefore this thread has a rating between -20 and -23.

but wait! we can narrow this down even further by using our own vote to manipulate things. by downfragging "rate my racism" it achieves a downfrag total of -21, and if we reload the page, this thread is now ranked higher than "rate my racism."[b] therefore this thread must have -20 downfrags at the time of writing [/b](through some unthorough testing i found that if a thread is updated to receive the same number of downfrags as another thread, it will not move in the rankings, ruling out the possibility of this thread having a rating of -21)

[img]https://i.imgur.com/R8N7uge.png[/img][/quote]


thanks gibus, this is very helpful[/quote]
couldn't have done it without you