Well in the first place, you didn't define what "rudamentary" english meant, because that depends on what you consider "rudimentary".

Uh, you can't say "me uber" like you can in esperanto ("min uberu!") kritzkreig enemy using in english.

There are fundamental differences in those indeed rushed calls I made that can't be replicated in english, which is why I listed them.

Also: "Flankonto alsaltas min!" and "Poduope puŝas ili!" try and replicate those in english...

Like Esperanto, [1][2][3] I cited lots of evidence earlier and you completely ignored it.

That's because of the culture that's been built up by natives, that prevents English from being used so regularly. There's no reason to have this today, and there's a reform propsal of English that's been sitting around for a century by now.

Also, foreign speakers of english do use grammatically precise elements of english against the proper forms, because learning all the irregularities is difficult for them.

I would easily have used the word misconflate, if I was allowed to. but y'all didn't allow me to. So actually, I don't see the opposite in english. I see the exact behavior I described earlier.

Or is it? is ¨spy scout" an infinitive and acusative, or an adjective and substantive, or a substantive and adjective?

Uh that makes word combination harder not easier, and Esperanto is an international, not just intereuropean, language.

It doesn't make sense for me indeed; but I just thought it would make sense for European competitive players.

Uh, thats literally what they said:

I didn't misinterpret anything here.

Seemingly simple, but you are forgetting about are the irregularities of English that make itself harder to understand.

If I see an esperanto word, I can be confident in comprehending the word because of the lack of irregularities. I can't have the confidence in comprehending an English word.

Esperanto equivalents use already existing radicals so that the communicated doesn't have to learn another radical; that's how they're beneficial. The benefit is not having to immediately look at a dictionary again (or if needed, less often).

because the brain needs time to think. actual thought requires effort and time, even if a very small amount; we just don't notice because we adjusted to thinking that our brain can tolerate it.

You have to remember, it takes time to memorize multiple radicals; it'd be easier to understand a combination of words («rapid'damaĝ'ar'il'o») than to memorize a single different radical. (example: kritzkrieg, well actually, two different radicals lol)

You also forgot about abbreviation: in fact the english term "kritz" in this context is actually an abbreviation of "kritzkreig". I can abbreviate"rapiddamaĝarilo" to "rdai"o, in which the word ends up being as long as the english abbreviation "kritz". Another example is "Malamiko" to "M-amiko", whch is 1 letter longer than the english term "enemy", but requires less memorization.

but can you distinguish them when it matters? in exchange for the redundancy and the tiny few miliseconds, you get good clarity, which can be more important than just the general radicals.

What if I said "spy enemy"? When context gets complex, how would you know for certain whether those words were adjectives, an infinitive and accusative, or substantive and adjective, or adjective and substantive? How would you get the full context without seeing any other indicators (like finger pointing) at all?

Of course, too much redundancy is also bad; that is why Esperanto has the grammar it has.

Also, for clarification, there is no "conjugation" system (like Spanish) in Esperanto; you can combine any radical you want (normal, pronoun, preposition, etc.): like "dis'de" and "ŝi'ar'o".

And finally, in Esperanto, you can replace (only) the -o ending, to communicate the substantive, and (only) the -a of the article with a line. this is because the substantive can communicate an adjective and adverb. example: «ŝiler'» for «ŝiler'o».

Depends on what you call "rudimentary", but yes I can.

Here is your table of calls that are not possible in rudimentary english: https://markdownpastebin.com/?id=36ebd9e2f2de406483c0f5d63a357fb3
These are the general calls. (If you want, I could try my hand at making map callouts in esperanto. ) However, there are already general differences between the esperanto and english forms:

• The esperanto forms have consistent endings marking redundancy, so the brain doesnt have to do extra processing after hearing or reading; in contrast to the english forms which are not immediately distinguishable
  at the time of reading or hearing, so the brain has to do more work in processing ambiguities.
  
• The esperanto forms are much more free in word order; the english forms are less free in word order.
  
• The esperanto forms have consistent sounds, so the brain can do less audio processing than in english.

Conclusion

So generally, calls in esperanto would be very consistent and would require less processing than calls in English.

In competitive TF2, processing calls as fast (down to the millisecond) and as clear as possible is very important; so therefore, making calls in esperanto would be good (for efficiency) right?

I've done this in an hour and 16 minutes. (50 minutes was spent on actually generating the damn table lmao.)

Circumcision indeed sucks ass; wish I was never born in this country...

I don't really care about that vaccine pseudoscience crap though.

?

I didn't say I'd quit making stuff for TF2: https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/User:Amicdict

So brody didn't respond once to the above comment, so I'm guessing that they did not study it for any length of time. In that case, it is very hypocritical of you to talk down to me for being arrogant in comp knowledge, but to then not even study Esperanto and arrogantly spread incorrect information about it, not even providing evidence.

Also I linked you sources, multiple times, (this one in particular: https://web.archive.org/web/20191027044103/http://remush.be/rebuttal/index.html#English).

Well, how much did you study Esperanto? I've been studying it for a year and 1 month.

No I did not know that... that's gotta suck.

Still in the first place, no one should be forced to pay to survive... or get anything for that matter. This is yet another result of capitalism being disastrous for humanity.

Most of the length was from quote blocks though...

I know... I wish I didn't return. I just felt like I had to say something.

Whats wrong with Esperanto or Common Lisp?

edit: meant to respond to the quoted person, not to all.

Esperanto aint retarded, nor a meme. It's actually pretty intelligent. much more so than English.

only 16 rules and all letters have consistent sound; any root words can be junctioned with each other; theres no grammatical gender; and there are completely no exceptions: https://www.akademio-de-esperanto.org/fundamento/gramatiko_angla.html.

there's a reason Esperanto is the only other language I've managed to properly learn.