Oppebo@comanglia
Pretty much what Alec said. 240Hz is awesome I'd say it's more noticeable than going from 120Hz to 144Hz even, but at ~$500 it isn't worth it unless you're playing in Invite already, or you're specifically trying to make a career out of playing Esports and are already playing a FPS at a mid-high or high level. Keep in mind I've had a 240Hz monitor for about 3 months now and their's still PLENTY of scouts at 144Hz that are way better at DM then I am.
Also for anyone actually considering a 240Hz monitor the BenQ has some nice features but I wouldn't exactly recommend it. Been dealing with dust and dirt UNDER the screen appearing every few weeks, just started the process to RMA it last friday.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwoVuGdjmbstSURhcnFnRlltUEU
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwoVuGdjmbstUTRLZlkwVmxPY0E
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwoVuGdjmbstbFN5TksyV3p0MWs
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwoVuGdjmbstdkgxbkZqZ2JpNEk
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwoVuGdjmbstbGF5UHJpb1o0WGM
ZestyAlmost everyone even with configs is gonna dip below 240 fps a lot in tf2 so I doubt it's worth at all. Might be good for CS as it's hitscan only and better optimised tho?
With a good setup, stable overclocking with cool temps, and a lot of optimization you can have ~300fps on 6s midfights.
Main Board: Asus Z87-A ATX
CPU: Intel i7-4790K @4.8 GHz
SSD: Crucial M4 SSD 250GB
Hard Drive: 1TB SeaGate 7200RPM
CPU Fan: Phanteks PH-TC14PE
GPU: ASUS GTX 1070 8GB ROG STRIX OC
Memory: G.Skill Sniper Series 32GB 1866MHz
PSU: Cooler Master VSM 650W 80+ Gold
Windows: W10 64-Bit
Case: Fractal Design Define R4 (Gun Metal)
Monitor: BenQ XL2540 @240Hz
My minimum FPS in a 24 person badwater server is 205 in DX 9 DX 8 in a 24 person server is about 220
joshuawni'm interested in how the XL2546 performs latency-wise & G2G-wise against other 144hz-240hz monitors out there:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XT6XQ6V/
DyAc (a supposedly low-latency form of strobing/motion blur reduction) is enabled by default.
I assume the panel and thus the GTG and overshoot is exactly the same as the 2540. Overshoot is worse than my BenQ XL2420TE and leaves a nice ghost trail behind players quite often (only a few pixel trail noticeable but not enough to annoy most) GtG is probably identical to most other BenQ GtG times average GtG being ~3.4ms (benq worst TN in this was 3.8ms best being 3.2ms, best ASUS in this category was 2.9ms, and one AOC monitor hit 2.7ms for an average but the AOC had horrible horrible overshoot)
As for DyAc I 100% don't believe it's worth an extra $50, especially since you can enable the Blur Reduction through the Service Menu on the XL2540.
http://display-corner.epfl.ch/images/8/87/Service_menu_BenQ-XL2540.png
The bottom 3 settings control the blur reduction.
(trying to find more specific information if their's any other difference between the 2540 and 2546 and I have my doubts hardware wise there's anything different, but the overdrive tables may have been tweaked for better support of blur reduction)