It's good to see Europe trying to keep up with NA shitposting.
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198048400997 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:88135269] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:44067634 |
Country | Namibia |
Signed Up | August 17, 2012 |
Last Posted | May 13, 2020 at 10:05 AM |
Posts | 1658 (0.4 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | Menstrual |
Windows Sensitivity | Rock |
Raw Input | 0 |
DPI |
Always DP |
Resolution |
About 3 pixels |
Refresh Rate |
Pressing f5 usually |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | Mus musculus |
Keyboard | Typewriter with a string coming out of it |
Mousepad | Coffee Table |
Headphones | Speakers and a mic in the middle of my room |
Monitor | iPad |
rangaDrPloxoclckwrkWhile this statement is 100% true. I think the majority of the disgust comes from the idea that they're eating dogs, which wasn't uncommon at all for a lot of the world until recently.omnificStealing anybody's pet animal and then burning them alive is fucked up no questions askedI don't think anyone, from anywhere or any background enjoys having their pet stolen from them to murder..
lol really? is everyone here that uneducated, or are you just making assumptions
pretty sure people are angry at the way these creatures are killed, which is torture. the fact that people here spend time (and research and provide random anecdotes that they think justifies this) to vouch against this protest or petition is hilarious.
Totally. That's why halal and kosher meats are getting protested too. OH! or the ban on Foie Gras that's everywhere in western culture -- that's a thing, right?
Totally dude, really well educated. Great GED.
clckwrkomnificStealing anybody's pet animal and then burning them alive is fucked up no questions askedI don't think anyone, from anywhere or any background enjoys having their pet stolen from them to murder..
While this statement is 100% true. I think the majority of the disgust comes from the idea that they're eating dogs, which wasn't uncommon at all for a lot of the world until recently.
Formally, the country has not banned the eating of dog, but has banned similar festivals. The townspeople seemed to have barely known about the festival at all, meaning it is definitely a minority. There IS a cultural meaning to the eating of dog during this specific time (something about staving off a shitty winter). While I really love the nonchalance put into your post and the sarcastic, clearly intelligent because I can make a mediocre counterpoint vibe throughout all of it, the final sentence seems to miss that the crime and the festival are separate. The theft of the dog from a household is separate from the cultural aspect of that. While the festival may spark the theft, similar to the holidays increasing theft in America, that is no reason to ban the event as a whole.
Similarly, assuming we're pro-dog torture simply because we don't see the point in intervening in every countries business is pretty retarded. While I don't think this festival is a good idea, and don't support the act in general, I'm not gonna sit there and expect China to enforce this solely because a bunch of people don't want it to happen while it is not against their laws. If they want to enforce it, they can change their laws, however, we are being imperialistic in expecting this to change, we are forcing some sort of cultural force upon an country that is struggling to figure out it's own moral code. If you think that's a good thing, that's fantastic, but I don't believe it will warrant anything other than issues in the future.
THEBILLDOZERProcreativeI'm Buddhist by behavior and a skeptic by ideologywhat does this even mean
(nothing)
uberchainhttp://i.imgur.com/RxZsTbe.png
Read the article, it still is:
We don't question how every animal in the western world is treated, yet hundreds of documentaries describe it thoroughly, and similarly we treat our food like shit. Similar to what mustard said, I would be MUCH more concerned about the hunting of endangered species in China that is nearly unregulated, as well as their lax animal cruelty laws overall. However, dogs are not intrinsically viewed as ONLY pets in that area. We have pet pigs\goats\birds in the Western World and don't question eating them. You are, without a doubt, imposing European cultural standards on to an area that does not abide by them.
rowrowpro's looking at it from a more philosophical perspective, which is where occam's razor is a little more relevant.
It still represents the simplest methodology of handling multiple universes in tandem with Chaos theory.
If you're going to oversimplify it, yes, it does complicate it. But oversimplification is a problem in thought.
What about the awful slaughtering of Tanuki?
Have you seen those things? Adorbs.
Oh wait, somebody could say we're doing that cultural appropriation bullshit by imposing our cracker-ass culture onto their historic festivals.
How does multiple worlds violate Occam's Razor?
In the event that different times can exist it is the simplest solution. It's the only answer that doesn't become so confounded and abstract since all events create multiple worlds. You seem to be confusing psuedo-scientific bullshit in the realm of metaphysics.
Don't mention Donuggies though.
wareya>I never said IP match means the accounts are alts - only that they have a connection.
>the protocol has always been to ban based on IP matches.
My sides
>So how would you propose we track people who use alts to circumvent bans, if not through IP checking?
For one you can not make the first assumption that IP match for a hacker ====== hacker's alt and instead just look into the actual situation when you have to? You clearly have the time to watch demos, so saving time by making the assumption that X hacker has Y as an alt simply because they shared a rare IP once is fucking ridiculous.
Demos do nothing as well, different situations adding far too many variables.
I understand your point, but it IS effective for post-ban alts and you're a moron for assuming otherwise.
also, stop green-texting you mouth-breathing mongoloid
Idiots acting like the majority of people using alts are smart enough to change IPs
I understand why it isn't technically proof, but it is a good auto-deny.
if a single use of the same ip is enough to mark you as an alt I want new admins
Go ahead, volunteer for the position. I beseech thine perfect logic in identifying how idiots in this game hack.
Here's a great article on how your decision making process is actually going to work. Like all heuristics-based systems, it will have errors, those are also your job to fix.
However, in time you'll learn to call a fish a fish until you can prove it's a dolphin.
DavidTheWinomniJimiJamI think emotes using recognizable player faces would be fun to spam. Admirable doing the PogChamp face is definitely my favorite idea so far because I would actually want to use a funny emote like that all the time. Tyrone doing the Kreygasm face or something would also be pretty fun
It was discussed within the tftv team that while player faces are fun, they can become instantly irrelevant if the player drops from the scene. You'd also need to consider newer viewers who would probably sub if they could understand what the emotes are actually about.
This. Look at our current emote selection. Is it at all relevant to TF2 in 2015?
Cyzer still plays tf2
THEBILLDOZERPankeymanDonuggieshappy birthday and all, but at what point in your life were you eating donuts and chicken nuggets at the same time and decided that doing this would be a good idea.
has anybody else gotten the balls to try if this isn't disgusting?
He might be on to something.
smoboSideshowI think the overall tf2 ideas like head / air / meat / shot / uber drop / etc are better than the "memes" since they'll always be relevantthis also memes are stupid and i hate them
Meme-hatred is a meme (^:
Get meme'd