My personal, unofficial stance is that "shit happening" is part of the consideration for betting. Shit happens sometimes and as a result a team loses.
Geel9
| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561197996869097 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:36603369] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:18301684 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | March 13, 2015 |
| Last Posted | April 25, 2020 at 6:17 PM |
| Posts | 571 (0.2 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
#46
ash leaves froyotech
in
News
Not_Matlockcage-league fees reimbursed after literally the whole season?https://imgfave-herokuapp-com.global.ssl.fastly.net/image_cache/1281340707142708.jpeg
You wound me
posted about 9 years ago
#16
Should Saloon.tf Verify This Match?
in
Off Topic
We'll have to discuss this internally but I feel that even if we enact a new rule to cover this, it should only apply to future matches.
Either way, nothing is certain yet.
posted about 9 years ago
#35
TF2 players = rich?
in
Esports
Bobsplosion is some oil baron or something with way too much disposable income, he hasn't actually made a PROFIT off tf2
posted about 9 years ago
#35
Steam Escrow Update
in
Off Topic
niteGeel9FYI you don't just enter a code from the steam app -- you have to visit a webpage within the steam client on your phone and hit an accept button. It's more involved than just a code.
i'd imagine you will be able to disable it just like the email verification though, correct? I don't think valve would be dumb enough to alienate anyone using their platform that doesn't have a cell phone.
What would the point of a security measure be if the hijacker could just opt you out of it
posted about 9 years ago
#30
Steam Escrow Update
in
Off Topic
FYI you don't just enter a code from the steam app -- you have to visit a webpage within the steam client on your phone and hit an accept button. It's more involved than just a code.
posted about 9 years ago
#27
Sweden increase terrorist risk level - Dreamhack
in
TF2 General Discussion
the problem is that nobody cares about a bunch of "nerds" so bombing them will just get people only slightly riled up
"yeah they died but fuck 'em they were nerds"
posted about 9 years ago
#133
Hassassin_ cheat evidence.
in
TF2 General Discussion
why would you want to play against someone who clearly has absolutely no integrity whatsoever
posted about 9 years ago
#291
PARIS TERRORIST ATTACK
in
Off Topic
SocialiteAvastI was born in 20th century in Poland (also in the most conservative city here) and I don't believe that homosexuality is a sin :PvalkeriAvastMorals and what is deemed acceptable is entirely dependent on the society and time period.
You are telling me that in the future, if society says that is is completely moral for people to rape and murder innocent people, that you would be fine with it? That you don't have some inner voice telling you that that's immoral?
Are you saying if you were born in the year 1820 in the United States to a wealthy slave-owning family and were raised your entire life to dehumanize slaves with constant reinforcement of these beliefs from your friends and family you wouldn't at the very least be conflicted about what is right or wrong?
I'd say that's the exact same analogy trust me (saying that you don't oppose it here is harder than coming out as gay in western countries).
Yeah but everyone else around you did. Obviously not everyone agrees on morality but that in and of itself still gives MORE credence to the fact that it's all relative.
posted about 9 years ago
#284
PARIS TERRORIST ATTACK
in
Off Topic
SocialiteGeel9Godwin's Law :DvalkeriGeel9If morality is objective then why are bad people able to justify their ability to do bad things?
Just because morality is objective does not mean that people can only commit objectively moral acts. Everyone has free will to go against what is moral.
Actually, not really. Nobody thinks they're bad. Everyone justifies themselves -- EVERYONE. When you lash out in anger and insult someone, you're justifying it to yourself. Everyone may see you as an asshole but to you, you're in the right. Even if you apologize later, you were still acting in that moment in what you viewed as a moral way.
Hitler thought he was ridding the world of a fucking plague. EVERYONE thinks they're a goddamn saint.
And no I often immediately think about how what I did was bad, but I guess different people think differently.
Argument from fallacy xD
Yeah, you think about what you DID was bad, not about how what you're DOING is bad. Read my posts please.
valkeriAvastMorals and what is deemed acceptable is entirely dependent on the society and time period.
You are telling me that in the future, if society says that is is completely moral for people to rape and murder innocent people, that you would be fine with it? That you don't have some inner voice telling you that that's immoral?
I wouldn't be fine with it because my morals are based off the society that I grew up in, not the one that exists in the future.
posted about 9 years ago
#280
PARIS TERRORIST ATTACK
in
Off Topic
valkeriAvastImplying wholesale enslavement of other races wasn't seen as normal in the past
Implying women and sexual minorities weren't murdered and oppressed 100x more than they were today and seen as "cultural"/normal
In a previous post I stated that the enslavement of other races was seen as normal in the past, because society said that it was acceptable.
Exactly! That CLEARLY shows that society's views absolutely dictate said society's morals. Holy shit what don't you get about this?
posted about 9 years ago
#278
PARIS TERRORIST ATTACK
in
Off Topic
valkeriGeel9If morality is objective then why are bad people able to justify their ability to do bad things?
Just because morality is objective does not mean that people can only commit objectively moral acts. Everyone has free will to go against what is moral.
Actually, not really. Nobody thinks they're bad. Everyone justifies themselves -- EVERYONE. When you lash out in anger and insult someone, you're justifying it to yourself. Everyone may see you as an asshole but to you, you're in the right. Even if you apologize later, you were still acting in that moment in what you viewed as a moral way.
Hitler thought he was ridding the world of a fucking plague. EVERYONE thinks they're a goddamn saint.
posted about 9 years ago
#275
PARIS TERRORIST ATTACK
in
Off Topic
valkeriJaguarFiendYou're basically implying here that morality is objective but it is not. It is subjective and fluid and changes with times.
Imagine the worst possible immoral act that you can. If morality is subjective and fluid and changes with times. If morality is decided by society which you also changes. Then it is possible that society could say that that worst possible immoral act that you thought of could be morally acceptable at some point in time.
Yup! Correct.
You're still wrong.
posted about 9 years ago
#271
PARIS TERRORIST ATTACK
in
Off Topic
If morality is objective then why are bad people able to justify their ability to do bad things?
The very fact that people disagree on moral issues means that clearly it isn't objective in the slightest.
Religion is toxic to the mind.
posted about 9 years ago