Jstn7477
Account Details
SteamID64 76561197982896766
SteamID3 [U:1:22631038]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:0:11315519
Country United States
Signed Up January 5, 2013
Last Posted December 7, 2013 at 12:24 AM
Posts 146 (0 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity 3.0
Windows Sensitivity Default
Raw Input 0 
DPI
2300
Resolution
1920*1080
Refresh Rate
120Hz
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard Gigabyte Aivia Osmium Mechanical (MX Reds)
Mousepad Razer Scarab
Headphones Roccat Kave 5.1ch
Monitor ASUS VG236HE
1 ⋅⋅ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#2 Steampipe crashing issues in Q/A Help

Hmm, I've been stabbed quite a few times today and my SteamPipe Beta TF2 didn't crash. Are you running any special configs or have custom files installed?

posted about 11 years ago
#11 TF2 on the verge of being unplayable in Q/A Help
the301stspartan>vista
>expecting to live a normal, happy life

No seriously, get 7. Also RAM is cheap nowadays, so are core2quards. Then there is Chris' config of course which delivers you the poop grafics of your choice along with more fps.
If you can step it up to a little more than 100 bucks I would go with a cheap quadcore and 2-4 additional gigs of ram. Then you just have to pirate download torrent copy buy 64bit windows 7 and you should be good to go.

Sadly, DDR2 has been quite costly since it is outdated, and the DDR3 producers cut production late last year causing DDR3 kits to become on average 40% more expensive. If the OP has a technology retailer in their country that sells "refurbished" goods (e.g. Geeks.com in the USA) they can probably get a reasonable 2x2GB 800MHz kit for a decent price.

posted about 11 years ago
#66 TF2 benchmarks in TF2 General Discussion
WaldoBecause of how unvaried the current benchmark demo is, I recorded another one, which includes a lot more camera movement and some places with no action. It's about 2 minutes long, still shouldn't take too long.

Here's a DL link https://mega.co.nz/#!YoFDiCZC!CTaoM0DYyh_KwuVUf87YEwEeQPBOYJi7pZ2Gc2dxjaw

My time for it with dx9/shadows off/gibs+ragdolls off
8509 frames 89.021 seconds 95.58 fps (10.46 ms/f) 8.416 fps variability

8509 frames 67.324 seconds 126.39 fps ( 7.91 ms/f) 7.479 fps variability
(same specs as post #68)

posted about 11 years ago
#7 TF2 on the verge of being unplayable in Q/A Help

You definitely need a new platform, or at least a better CPU (higher clocked Core 2 Quad). The GTS 450 is alright for TF2, but the CPU is holding you back significantly (and you can't overclock it because it's a 1333MHz FSB processor and you have a G31 chipset motherboard, if it even has overclocking options). Your CPU is rated for about 15 GFLOPs when newer quad cores bench about 60-120 (depending on AVX being supported).

Probably your best bet for under $100 would be a Core 2 Quad Q6700 or QX6700 from eBay. You also really need more than 2GB of RAM, but you have a 32bit OS and a 1GB video card that eats away at one of your 4GB of addressable RAM. It's a tough call between more RAM and a better CPU because both are probably killing your performance right now.

posted about 11 years ago
#64 TF2 benchmarks in TF2 General Discussion
2639 frames 22.900 seconds 115.24 fps ( 8.68 ms/f) 4.659 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i7-3770K @ 4.3 GHz, 4x4GB DDR3-2133 CL11
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7970 @ 1150/1650

Driver version: Catalyst 13.5 Beta2
dxlevel (default is 90): 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: None
Shadows enabled/disabled: Enabled

Additional notes: SteamPipe Beta (not that this really matters, I have an SSD anyway).

posted about 11 years ago
#6 TF2 update broke my servers!! in Q/A Help

New engine_srv.so released, update your servers again and they work properly now.

posted about 11 years ago
#13 April 23rd update. in TF2 General Discussion
jp_Curious how well the map download restriction will work with VPK's (steampipe anyone?). Can't I as a server admin make a malicious VPK that includes a map and some furry porn for the hud? (I know l4d2 allows hud modifications via vpk files)

From what I heard, servers do not serve VPKs. Custom maps likely stay loose as they have been all along.

Also, Metamod: Source is broken on Linux servers. This means mods like MGEMod on those servers are not working at the moment, so please try not to harass your server OPs about it as there's nothing we can do until a new MM:S build is compiled.

posted about 11 years ago
#2 TF2 update broke my servers!! in Q/A Help

Metamod: Source is currently non-functional on Linux servers, but works fine on Windows. I am awaiting an update from AlliedModders concerning the issue. This means that most MGEMod servers and other mods that are running on Linux servers are non-functional at this time. Also, the build number turned into a 7 digit number for some reason.

posted about 11 years ago
#9 laptop and external monitors in Off Topic

Laptop antennas run up the sides of the notebook lid and typically terminate on metal pads in the upper third of the screen. When your notebook lid is closed, you're likely orienting the antenna pads perpendicular to the router's antennas instead of parallel, and that likely dramatically reduces the effective surface area of the antennas. I'm not an antenna engineer by any means, but this seems to be the most logical reasoning for your issue.

Leave the laptop open and the back of the lid oriented towards your router, and use the display toggle key combination (usually the function key + one of the F keys that has two boxes or CRT/LCD printed on it) until your external display is enabled but your notebook display is disabled.

posted about 11 years ago
#8 Fyi, the 24" Asus 144Hz monitor is on sale ($270) in Hardware

I'd love to upgrade to one, but honestly my ASUS VG236H 120Hz has been great, and the CCFL backlight seems fairly natural. If I were a first time buyer, I'd probably purchase this one given my good experiences with the older model.

posted about 11 years ago
#9 tf2 fps in Hardware
Pillowmaker[thanks a lot but i have a 2.20 GHz if that matters which i guess is low

Honestly, that was what I was expecting for a mid-high end gaming laptop. Most of the mobile quad core CPUs are still in the low-mid 2GHz range, which is honestly a lot better than 2010 when the first generation mobile i7 chips were 1.6-1.73GHz. I'd be happy with what you're getting out of the laptop now, as my 2010 notebook with an AMD Phenom II X920 quad core @ 2.2GHz and a mobile HD 5650 drops to 25-30 FPS during large fights, and stays around 50-60 in low load situations on the lowest settings. Your minimum frame rate is fairly comparable to a desktop Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) from around the time TF2 was released.

The only real thing I can suggest is making sure multicore rendering is enabled. I don't believe you can do much else to increase your minimum framerate as the GTX 560M (same chip as a desktop GTX 550 Ti with lower clocks) is more than sufficient for TF2's graphical demands.

posted about 11 years ago
#3 tf2 fps in Hardware

It sounds like your CPU might be a bottleneck, as TF2 is more CPU intensive than GPU. What CPU do you have, and is it overclocked? Even with my overclocked HD 7970, Core i7-3770K @ 4.3GHz and 4x4GB DDR3-2133 CL11 RAM, my FPS drops down to around 80-100 from 120FPS VSYNC on 24+ player servers that have lots of action going on, despite neither my GPU or CPU being remotely close to being maxed out.

I also experience similar FPS drops in TESV: Skyrim (game engine only supports 2 cores) and Minecraft (poor multithreading). TF2 must do some expensive calculations that cause an increase in frame latency, as Chris's configs literally do nothing for my system.

EDIT: From the sounds of it, you probably have a mobile i7 clocked in the low 2GHz range.

posted about 11 years ago
#2 New G500 for sale in Hardware

Nice price, got mine new in March 2011 for $62 and it still works perfectly.

posted about 11 years ago
#15 Inspired in TF2 General Discussion
alfunksoswitches replicate every package they receive to every connected terminal, it's up to the terminal (the pc) to figure out what packages he should read and what packages he should discard, this adds up latency.

This isn't true. An Ethernet hub is an OSI layer 1 device that broadcasts all signals received on a port to every other port excluding the port where the incoming signal originated. Since they operate at the physical layer, hubs cannot discern what a frame is. The entire hub is a single collision domain and every device must take turns transmitting or receiving signals.

An Ethernet switch is an OSI layer 2 device that is capable of analyzing frames because it operates in the data link layer. Therefore, it is able to analyze frames and forward them to the appropriate port. This is why switches don't have collision problems, because each individual port becomes its own collision domain.

A router is a layer 3 device with makes it superior to hubs and switches, but having more than a single router on your network is utterly pointless because it will manage every device on its LAN anyway.

"A switch is a telecommunication device that receives a message from any device connected to it and then transmits the message only to the device for which the message was meant. This makes the switch a more intelligent device than a hub (which receives a message and then transmits it to all the other devices on its network)."

posted about 11 years ago
#90 MGE 2.0 release in TF2 General Discussion
vileyou always respawn at the cliff on blands spire unless both players are spawning at the same time.

I'll look into this. I have a hunch that the changes I made to the Badlands displacements (the terrain) last year may have changed the general height of the terrain by a few units, causing the original spawn points to become invalid. The number of triangles had to be reduced in the terrain because Valve designed Badlands with "Power 4" displacements that aren't supported properly in Hammer/Source SDK, causing unusually large map file sizes and preventing terrain physics calculations from being computed. I had to reduce the displacements to "Power 3" which reduced their "resolution" due to the reduced triangle count.

I'm a bit surprised nobody noticed/mentioned this sooner.

posted about 11 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10