And this pretty much sums up your entire nonsensical argument. You just sit there and imagine up scenarios where it could cause an issue, while ignoring reality. By reading your post you get the idea of OMG HOW COULD TRANS PEOPLE IN BATHROOMS EVER WORK, ignoring the fact that it has already worked perfectly fine for years. I don't even have to deconstruct your shitty arguments because reality has already done the job for me

Really, the "OMG THINK OF THE WOMEN" falls apart immediately when you look at the actual stats of violence of people abusing gender laws vs violence towards trans.

If you actually cared about reducing sexual violence then there's only one position you can take, and you are on the wrong side of the issue.

lmao

how quickly we went from that to "WELL THERES NO WAY TO PROVE ANYTHING SO IM JUST GONNA BELEIVE WHAT I BELIEVE"

I try to avoid name calling but its exceedingly hard when people do incredible things like post articles that state exactly the opposite of what they are claiming it says

dont wanna get called a racist/bigot etc, dont post racist/bigoted stuff

"People who criticize _______ are the real _______!"

Please. heard it all before. You want to spout stupid stuff and not be criticized about it. Yawn.

l m a o

1. It proves your claim has no scientific basis and is instead a product of your own preconceived biases

2.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false
and a direct link to the article
http://faculty.law.miami.edu/mcoombs/documents/Stacey_Biblarz.pdf

note that this is a meta-analysis of multiple studies

at least 150 scientists and literally the journal it was published in considering it later published an audit saying the original study should have never made it through peer review and a counter study that concluded the original study was flawed

i love the "you post a shitty study and i refute it" game

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study

"Cynthia Osborne, who is on the UT-Austin faculty along with Regnerus, argued the study was unable to show "whether same-sex parenting causes the observed differences."[1] She also said that "Children of lesbian mothers might have lived in many different family structures, and it is impossible to isolate the effects of living with a lesbian mother from experiencing divorce, remarriage or living with a single parent."[1] Similarly, Gary Gates of the Williams Institute argued that the study's comparison of children of lesbian mothers was a less fair comparison than, for instance, comparing "children of heterosexual or same-sex couples who were raised in similar homes".[1]

Several writers criticized Regnerus' study for classifying children as being raised by gay parents merely if one of their parents ever had a same-sex relationship until the child turned 18.[9][10] Additionally, Regnerus himself acknowledged that other factors might explain the differences observed in his study, including "...a lack of social support for parents, stress exposure resulting from persistent stigma, and modest or absent legal security for their parental and romantic relationship statuses."[11] In the July 2015 issue of Social Science Research, Cheng and Powell reanalyzed the data from Regnerus' study and found numerous potential measurement errors, and concluded that Regnerus' conclusions were due to these errors "and other methodological choices"

In July 2012, over 150 scientists wrote a letter to the editor of Social Science Research criticizing the study and raising concerns about the journal's peer review process.[4] In the November 2012 issue of the journal, an audit was published by Darren Sherkat of Southern Illinois University regarding the peer-review process with respect to the Regnerus study (as well as another study from the same issue). The audit concluded that the peer-review process failed in these instances because of “both ideology and inattention” by the reviewers; he added that of the six reviewers, three of them were on record as opposing same-sex marriage.[16] Sherkat also dismissed the study as "bullshit" in an interview and argued that its definition of gay fathers and lesbian mothers should have “disqualified it immediately” from being considered for publication.[17]

second study refuting the first
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1500085X

lest there be any more doubt about the "FAMILY POLICY institute of washington"

http://www.fpiw.org/resources/#toggle-id-8

Look at the articles on same sex marriage, featuring great articles such as
"What Does the Bible Say About Homosexuality?" and
"How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Freedom"

also

http://equalitymatters.org/blog/201202030004
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/02/26/washington-state-anti-lgbt-group-launches-campa/208831

To add on to my last post, this is what an ACTUAL pediatrician group has to say on the issue

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/02/24/peds.2015-3223

note that the membership of ACPeds is estimated at around 200 people while the membership of APP is 60,000 with a staff of 400

ah yes
ACPEDS

all you really need to do is do two seconds of research about them really people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_College_of_Pediatricians

"The ACPeds letter to the superintendents primarily addressed same-sex attraction, and recommended that “well-intentioned but misinformed school personnel” who encourage students to “come out as gay” and affirm them as such may lead the students into “harmful homosexual behaviors that they otherwise would not pursue"

Clearly a non-biased organization

this is a far cry from what you said earlier

But no, that paper is literally saying that race is a social construct, from the first paragraph to the last, perhaps you were confused by the wording?? i know words are hard

"As a biological rather than a social construct, “race” has ceased to be seen as a fundamental reality characterizing the human species. "

"If it were admitted that the category of “race” is a purely social construct, however, it would have a weakened legitimacy. Thus, there have been repeated attempts to reassert the objective biological reality of human racial categories despite the evidence to the contrary."

Are you trolling? This paper also says there's no basis for biological racial difference...like its right there in the title

I refuse to believe someone is seriously this dumb

The "white race" has done many shitty things too, but i bet you aren't rushing to take credit or feel pride for those things

BTW that dumb ass study was not intended to show whether transitioning was an effective treatment for transitioning or not

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885

IN THAT VERY STUDY

" It does not, however, address whether sex reassignment is an effective treatment or not."

" Our findings suggest that sex reassignment, although alleviating gender dysphoria, may not suffice as treatment for transsexualism, and should inspire improved psychiatric and somatic care after sex reassignment for this patient group."

Note the word suffice. That does not mean we get rid of the treatment, only improve it!

"For the purpose of evaluating whether sex reassignment is an effective treatment for gender dysphoria, it is reasonable to compare reported gender dysphoria pre and post treatment. Such studies have been conducted either prospectively or retrospectively, and suggest that sex reassignment of transsexual persons improves quality of life and gender dysphoria"

another study showing that 95 percent of individuals who transitioned report positive life outcomes as a result.

https://www.skane.se/Upload/Webbplatser/USIL/Dokument/Sjukhusbibliotek/Johansson,%20Annika.pdf

more studies showing acceptance is what affects suicide rates

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03625.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461468

more studies in favor of gender assignment

http://www.researchgate.net/publication/262734734_An_Analysis_of_All_Applications_for_Sex_Reassignment_Surgery_in_Sweden_1960-2010_Prevalence_Incidence_and_Regrets

http://www.cakeworld.info/transsexualism/what-helps/srs

BUT WHAT ABOUT REGRET

"Surgical regret is actually very uncommon. Virtually every modern study puts it below 4 percent, and most estimate it to be between 1 and 2 percent"

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=-qtlZDCMAZ4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=transgenderism+and+intersexuality+in+childhood+and+adolescence&ots=A4yTHR-Fvd&sig=n8CXw7NhWSbNS33fsgam3XGu1PQ#v=onepage&q=transgenderism%20and%20intersexuality%20in%20childhood%20and%20adolescence&f=false

http://www.iiav.nl/ezines/web/ijt/97-03/numbers/symposion/ijtc0502.htm

bla bla bla
even more sourced studies here
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brynn-tannehill/myths-about-transition-regrets_b_6160626.html

wow i sure love reasonable discussions on the topic of gender

you apparently know whats best for them

Yes, the solution and treatment of gender dysphoria is transitioning.