absolutely not, it implies that a post with a fallacy might or might not arrive at the correct conclusion, not that any post calling out a fallacy is automatically wrong.

as for whether or not it means anything, it's just worth noting when you want to argue things like that, so it does serve a purpose. It's also a fun fact :^)

did you know that implying an argument is wrong purely on the basis it contains a fallacy is fallacious in itself?

fresh tbh

You have to understand that I was just saying if that guy in the video told me he was transgender then that would be my opinion on him specifically, not hating on trans people tbh, if it came across as me saying any different then apologies, genuinely. I really don't mean to be offensive.

I fully support trans people using their correct bathrooms or lockers or whatever, just not a random bloke saying 'I'm a 6''3 asian woman' using them, because if I was a girl, I would feel uncomfortable with that, because I wouldn't know if the person was truely trans or not, just like you said, you can't just say it and have people believe it.

The surgery comment wasn't just for transgender, like, if he identifies as taller, maybe some day he'll be able to get surgery to be taller, or if someone identifies as a fox, maybe one day they can get a tail or some orange fur or some shit, whatever they want. I'm not trying to say all trans people have to get surgery or whatever, I'm just saying the whole 'identify as X' thing might be easier all round if everyone just looked the way they wanted to.

but yea genuinely sorry if I offended anyone in general, if you still aren't a fan of my viewpoint then it is what it is I guess, but I'll definitely accept I didn't put it across very well the first time

I feel like in order to identify as something and have that be respected by people or law etc, you need to actually do something about it? I'm not saying you can't have the idea in your head, but you can't really expect people to bend over backwards for you if you haven't made any effort.

Like for instance, if I just say I'm a girl and then go into the female lockers, still looking like a guy, I can hardly expect people to not be uncomfortable, whereas if I look like I might potentially be a girl or be transitioning then it's a lot more reasonable to expect people to not tell me to get the fuck out.

Who knows maybe one day you'll be able to get surgery to look however you want.

what a huge loss, my GAMER CARD

alright my b, sorry team (

1600 viewers on tftv as of now, most watched i've seen in years

I got a 4, I always assumed I had extremely poor colour differentiation, because I usually find in video games that I don't see people, apparently I'm just super unobservant. :(

Thank you very much for the feedback. For the most part I'd like to keep sniping to choke from both ends open- I'll make sure I add some more cover to cave especially though. This should help teams pushing into 2nd get around sniper. As for 2nd itself, widening the point is definitely going to happen- I can afford to add some crates to block vision if I do that, without cramping the point. This should also make 2nd a bit more dynamic for scouts. Very good idea.

For mid, I do think that if the enemy team comes out of cave they've got a pretty good chance. It's important to remember that in cases like this, if the enemy team can get close and have a somewhat good uber, they have the advantage if no picks were given. It's kind of like pushing gullywash mid against a sniper, except in that case it's worse because the enemy team can get out super fast and still guarantee a force since you're coming from big door. I'll have to monitor this further. What will probably happen is that I'll bring cave a bit closer to the enemy side, which will give attackers a better uber, if they choose to push there. I'll add some cover for the shutter push also, that's certain, which will also semi block sightlines from shutter to choke. This will prevent a 'free escape' for the sniper, improving uber situations for attackers. It can't hurt to raise mid point a little too.

As for last, it's designed to be very easy to attack given that the enemy team doesn't forward hold. I don't really mind the attacking sniper seeing a large amount from right- that's a price you pay for losing control of window room. In this case, you will most likely lose last anyway, window room is the strongest defensive position. Compare it to snakewater- if you lost the hut, then a sniper can get full vision there without really being contested. Similarly, once you lost the hut, it's likely that you won't hold the point.
If you do have lobby, the sightlines are pretty null. Even when you lose lobby, you still want to be holding on the front rafters, not above point, because if you go far back, you let the other team in for free. It just happens to be the case that holding in the optimal position makes sniper a lot weaker. Unfortunately, when people in TF2C play the map for the first time, there's little chance that the 'best' hold will be discovered in a 12 minute game. Potentially sniper might see an issue, but for now, I don't think it'd be outlandish to leave last as it is for now.

Thank you for the great feedback, and of course for playing the map. Lots of love <3

Hello guys, I'm very sorry, like I said I haven't been checking TFTV. I missed these last 2 feedbacks, I will definitely be taking them into account for my next version, if they are still up. I'm really thankful that you took the time to do that and I'm sorry that I didn't see it.
Sage, I considered to clip that window, but given that one of the most useful rollouts is to go through there and then jump up through right, I wanted to keep it as the toughest rollout. I guess I will try it with that next version. About the healthkits for choke, the one in pit forces a medic to go out of position for health, which I think rewards good decision making and allows for timed sacrifices to be very successful. I will make sure to focus my attention on whether flow at that choke point is a problem. Please let me know if you agree, disagree guys, would be great to hear additional voices on this.

Thanks to all 3 of you for playing it, I really appreciate that.

While I've not been updating, there's been a fair few changes, mostly in terms of experimenting with cave and 2nd, but the changes for the most part have been reverted as they weren't great. One of the reasons I haven't been posting updates is that I won't publicly release a version I don't think is any good.
On that note, a10 is out. The main change you’ll notice is the maps been decorated. Other than that, between these versions, there’s been a resizing of lobby and cave. The spawn times and travel times have been played with a lot, won’t list them all but it should make the map flow a bit better and allow for some good moments. Choke has had a height and width increase which should allow teams to get into mid with a bit more breathing room and less claustrophobia.

If you'd like to play the map, the latest version is on serveme.tf and the download can be found on page 1.

Known gameplay issue- pixelwalk on fence outside spawn, strange shadow in cave, unsmooth displacement in pit.

The main downside here is that since I started decorating, the map is unoptimized again. I've had some guys testing the fps, it should still be very playable for the majority of people, but I'm fully aware of the issue and definitely working on it to make sure I don't end up with the coalplant problem. Next version will be focused on polish and FPS numbers.

wtf? not only was I not told I was on the team I was also not told I wasn't playing anymore

LFT solid high fast pls guys

the main reason I didn't say that is purely because there's no chance of that ever happening

apparently I'm on bantermory (I wasn't aware of this until I looked at the participants)

please sign up, it would be such a fucking shame if bantermory qualified by default

i'll never be allowed to forget this
ffs

I saw him play at LAN, it's just that his flicks are so fast they're within 1 tick of the demo.