is the scope removal thingy still working?
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198154627508 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:194361780] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:97180890 |
Country | Mongolia |
Signed Up | September 15, 2014 |
Last Posted | August 10, 2018 at 8:49 AM |
Posts | 314 (0.1 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | 2.5 |
Windows Sensitivity | 6/11 |
Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
1000 |
Resolution |
1920x1080 |
Refresh Rate |
144hz |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | i'm |
Keyboard | surrounded |
Mousepad | by |
Headphones | idiots |
Monitor | *sigh* |
SetsulFermi Paradox is just a discrepancy between the expected amount of life and the actual amount. According to what we know it should be far higher. Which means either the universe is a lot more dangerous than we thought it is or life and evolution aren't as easy as we think they are.
So mathematical probability isn't an argument you should be using to tell us there's no life out there.
Also going by mathematical probability Boltzmann brain wins by a very large margin.
actually my initial idea was the contrast the mathematical probability with the fermi paradox
now that i reread my comments, i seem to have worded it a bit wrong, my bad. you are correct about this.
AvastExplain to me how the articles points of: We don't know if there is life but there is certainly the possibility of life does not equivocate into "Possibility of life"
brothah, the article has over 200 lines, you read the last 4 and used that to completely misinterpret the entire thing. either you fucking read the whole thing or you just stop trying. please.
thank you.
orbitThere is no reason to be aggressive towards people that are enthusiastic about a topic they don't know everything about, especially astronomy.
With the number of habitable zone exoplanets discovered in recent years and considering how fast life was able to develop on earth it wouldn't be too surprising if at least one other planet in our galaxy has some form of life. Sentient or not. There isn't any evidence to prove one way or the other yet sure, but it's fine to think one way or the other as long as you don't present it as fact.
even though your statement of "evidence" ignores credibility and the fact that one's closest to the truth is that who presents itself to be more rational and methodical, you've been so far the least idiot to talk about this. i appreciate your neutrality and lack of fallacies. thanks man.
retrogradequert is ur entire purpose in life to ruin peoples day?
while they did find "a small quantity of hydrated salt" the importance of the hydrated salt is twofold:
1. it proves that the RSLs are of liquid cause (thats a lot of liquid)
2. it proves that the liquid cause is in fact water and not a different liquid
not only are you wrong about the mars water you are also wrong about the probability of life:
1. ur the biggest fucking pessimist ive ever seen
2. the mathematical probability of life is pretty good considering the scale of the universe - there is an equation that is a good way to determine the amount of intelligent civilizations in our galaxy (and thats only INTELLIGENT and in our GALAXY) and the number varies from nah, we dont have shit and yea, theres a ton of people out there
3. the fermi paradox, countering the aforementioned equation, is applied for the most part to say that there are intelligent civilizations out there but some smaller value in the equation is preventing contact (the great filter theory), therefore your completely pessimistic application of the fermi paradox is not supported by the majority of the scientific community
fuck off and let people be happy
dude, the guy asked "how do they know it's water". i said "they found small quantity of hydrated salt" because that's what they used to determine its water. i'm not disproving freaking NASA, what the fuck is wrong with you.
also, i'm not a pessimist, just a realist who don't go around saying that there is life out there without having no clue whatsoever of what i'm talking about.
the mathematical probability of life is the exact opposite of what you said. considering the scale of the OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE, exactly why i quoted the fermi paradox.
and bruh, "your blablabla application of the fermi paradox is blablabla not supported by the majority of the sicentific community".
not only you don't have any fact or data to make that claim, i'm interested in knowing what kind of scientific community you're referring to. You're probably using the general consensus of ignorant people on the internet.
Avast
But what you just linked defnitely suggests a possibility of life????
Like the article you linked essentially says we know nothing and likely won't for a long time, so why are you linking an article filled with speculation to disprove speculation?
And why are you such a douche?
if that's what you got from the article, you obviously didn't read it. your "the article you linked essentially says" proves that. what you mean is "i completely misinterpreted the article and this is my equivocated view of what the article said"
BonafideSurely nothing has ever been debunked or newly discovered. Also the fermi paradox is not an answer it's a probability, and one of many theories.
http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/fermi-paradox.html
look at all that logic, batman!
iduno man, i give that way more credibility than a dude who basically says "space is big, so there is life."
which is what everyone keeps saying. you know, everyone who really doesn't know anything about space...
aim-how do they know its water?
couldn't it just be some other fluid.
they discovered a small quantity of hydrated salt.
BonafideNot to mention how we might find a eventually for interstellar communication that IS faster than the speed of light, maybe not in our lifetime, but who knows.
I can't believe you just said that crap. this is the equivalent of those youtube commenters on videos about space talking out of their arse about something they have no clue of.
every time someone brings up space there's always that guy......
also
BonafideIt's not only cool because there is a lot of potential on mars, but think about the entire universe, if two planets in one solar system have liquid water, imagine the endless possibilities ahead!
do your research, go read the fermi paradox or the correlation between the distances in space and mathematical probability for life before you get your ignorant imagination get the better of you.
thanks.
any info on the explosions? i was watching a jump demo and it kinda bugged out and the rocket explosions were making a very short, very subtle sound, and it was kinda pleasant. would be cool if someone could replicate that.
i already have the blank sound .wav files, just need the directory of wherever the explosions are located at, and i'm too lazy to try what #20 posted
has anyone tried replacing weapon sounds?
i wanted to replace the default rocket launcher and original sounds for black box's one.
also, do explosions have different files depending on which weapon used or it's the same file?
was also looking forward to mute voice commands and hurt sounds
i would try all of this if i could, but i have no experience in customization, i'd appreciate if someone could enlighten me about this.
is there a list anywhere for the names of all sounds in the game? i wanna remove sounds too but not all of them, just some.
replacing every sound file with a silent replacement doesn't seem too much of a hassle if i know the sounds name and the directory.
these crashes are so random, it would be easier to spot the problem if there was anything in common with them.
what can be done to stop this? it's obviously not occurring to everyone
I have crashed 3 times in a timespan of 20 minutes, all 3 immediately after dying.
i was losing hope, then 2:24 kicked in. instantly faved, great song, definitely gorillaz worthy, even though it doesn't sound like some of their music i recently listened to, i like this different approach.
So basically, what this guy did is pick the formidable instrumental of Intro by the xx and put his mediocre, kinda amateurish rap on top of it? well, gotta give points for originality....not.