| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561197981944988 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:21679260] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:10839630 |
| Country | Tonga |
| Signed Up | April 19, 2014 |
| Last Posted | November 10, 2024 at 5:11 PM |
| Posts | 1566 (0.4 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
1024*768 |
Refresh Rate |
75 Hz |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | Razer Copperhead |
| Keyboard | Packard Bell wireless AA powered |
| Mousepad | ikea gaming desk |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | Packard Bell 17" CRT |
really bad race but i have to say this penalty was bullshit. Something much worse happened between ric and ham at a monaco gp some years ago and ham wasn't penalized.
What's even more bullshit is that vet got a championship points penalty on top of that?
olgha kinda looks like orlando on this picture
who are svift owners?
getting 4 nerd stars
Gink looks like Tyrone no?
bad idea with very questionable execution; sacrilege can not play pyro but he can play soldier his 6s main without issues? I generally agree with Olgha here.
DuMmTmCookye isnt playing for them, has played the game twice this entire year, which they obv know so they presumably didnt feel bothered to include in the list of restricted players
ok but nothing in the rulebook prevents cookye from showing up to matches and playing scout. If you go and say "oh but he's roster riding", that does not mean anything rules wise. Anything left at admin discretion (we dont restrict cookye he roster rides lol) especially touching an admin team is a recipe for more shitstorms during the season
Take a harsher stance about sandbagging = no players allowed to play 2 divisions below their level (ex : div2 can't play low, div1 can't play mid) unless on medic.
How to determine skill level and write it in the rules?
Either a player played several matches (=more than 1 per season) on at least 2 consecutive seasons:
Or a player played 4 matches or more for one season.
These two cases cover the substitute, the recently promoted, and the regular player.
Boom, done.
articleand being the well-rounded player that he is, he fits in quite well
dunno if that is meant to be quoted as is. If it's an editor transcription, pls correct
An ban or unban should take a stronger (<70%) majority for the vote to have a meaning. Anything that is not disliked/wanted this much should not be changed for the sake of changing things around.
SetsulAlstom has been a publicly listed company since 1998 and since then has never been 100% french-owned? Or are we talking about a different Alstom? In what universe is acquisition of a publicly traded company coercing the EU?
I think you underestimate how complicated this is. They can penalize ARM for not complying but ARM will comply. The USA simply got no jurisdiction in the EU. Any company that's 100% outside of the US can just laugh in their face. There is no need to comply. What are the US going to do? Invade? ARM is partially in the US so they are vulnerable to fines and more drastic and more complicated things, but that doesn't mean they won't do everything that's legal to keep the business going.
I'm misinformed about Alstom then. But I was under the impression that as it has some strategical value for the french country, buying a big share would be subject to some government probing and authorization, and is more complicated than 'here is your money i buy you'.
Following your Panasonic argument, if ARM GB is not forced to comply, why did ARM say they would stop trading with Huawei globally? What is in it for them?
ooh i had no idea this 'lastweapon' was a thing lol
SetsulNone of these are examples of the USA coercing the EU though?
Not sure what you mean with Alstom.
ARM is refering to this one? What does the EU have to do with it?
T-Mobile vs Huawei? Where's the EU involved?
The last time the USA tried was vs Japan and that didn't go to well but pick any example. This isn't zero-sum mercantilism.
Alstom is/has been sold to foreign private interests recently, and was previously 100% french; ARM is a british company forced to comply to US sanctions against China if they do not want problems with doing business with America. It's a form of coercion and political influence to me. US decides who they penalize, everyone must comply.
T-Mobile case vs Huawei was told about in Screwball's source
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/lessons-america-japan-trade-war-1980s-24882
Is this article a decent source about the trade war you are talking about? I couldnt find much about it.
DiscordYou could possibly argue that China and USA's worldviews are similar, even though I think they are drastically different, but the state of the governments of China and USA are radically different regardless of whether or not you think USA is a joke right now.
As someone who has lived in both countries and have talked to my relatives that live in China and my relatives that have immigrated to the US from China and have put some research into the matter, China is magnitudes more corrupt with a system that is infinitely more broken and harmful to its citizens than the United States. Yes, you may think that America is a complete joke and in utter ruin right now, but comparing the two is basically making a mountain out of a molehill. If you want specifics I can provide them.
In response to the post, I do think Huawei will be fine.
If you have reading material telling how broken and harmful the Chinese system is, i'll read them. Can't say that I know much about China except that its citizens got richer over the last 30 years and that anyone is fine as long as they dont criticize the government (and post pooh memes)