Setsul
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198042353207
SteamID3 [U:1:82087479]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:41043739
Country Germany
Signed Up December 16, 2012
Last Posted April 26, 2024 at 5:56 AM
Posts 3425 (0.8 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input  
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
1 ⋅⋅ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ⋅⋅ 229
#2 Tf2 launches, and then immediately stops again in TF2 General Discussion

Have you tried installing DirectX?

posted about 4 years ago
#7 how to remove desktop icons in Hardware

https://i.imgur.com/fM8o174.jpg

posted about 4 years ago
#3532 PC Build Thread in Hardware

Define normal sized travel bag/suitcase. You could be a hobbit.

EDIT: Figured it out via Steam.

posted about 4 years ago
#3530 PC Build Thread in Hardware

Define smallish.

posted about 4 years ago
#18 Math problem IQ test in Off Topic

I'm not sure why you all can't count but it's 80/81/81 digits.
I don't think that's the smallest solution either, just one that was relatively easy to find.

Either way there are two ways to solve it. The proper way involves a lot of number theory, the quick and dirty way still requires you to be smart about it and probably a computer to brute force a part of it because of the numbers involved.
Essentially it is easy to get any solution, fairly easy to get one with positive numbers and incredibly easy to get one with whole numbers from one with rational numbers (just multiply all 3 numbers with all 3 denominators). Getting a positive and rational solution takes some fiddling though, either via brute force with numbers that a standard calculator won't like or a deep enough understanding of number theory.

posted about 4 years ago
#5 Math problem IQ test in Off Topic

Yeah, but at least now I know that I can read swedish math problems.
Now let him beräkna the längden on his own.

posted about 4 years ago
#3 Math problem IQ test in Off Topic

You don't even need that.

posted about 4 years ago
#10 14.2 lerp in Q/A Help

Yep, try it.
Assuming 66 rates the first two will both result in 0.0303 and the third in 0.0152.

Of course there is the issue of 66 vs 66.66666 vs 67 rates.

posted about 4 years ago
#6 14.2 lerp in Q/A Help

Nah, it's just that I literally wrote "don't do that, it's stupid, it's so stupid that most servers will stop you from doing it" and he went and did it anyway and the server stopped him and he didn't follow the instructions I gave him in case that happened to "fix" it.

posted about 4 years ago
#4 14.2 lerp in Q/A Help
SetsulIf you want to lie to yourself that this isn't stupid or need to bypass the sv_client_min_interp_ratio 1, which is set to stop you from doing stupid shit you need to lie to the server and set cl_updaterate 70 (even though a server that runs at 66.6666 ticks per second will never be able to send you 70 updates per second) because 1/70 = 0.0142857 so that's the interp TF2 will use even though it's bullshit.

The server is stopping you from being an idiot.

If you still want to be an idiot why bother with 14.2? Is that some magic value where the interpolation is only slightly broken but the 0.8ms you gained are more than worth it? Why not break it harder? Why not use updaterate 100 and get that sweet sweet 10 ms interp? You save a whole 5ms compared to working interp, which is almost noticeable on 50 ping and it only breaks interp 1/3 of the time. Or go all the way with updaterate 100000000. Just get rid of that pesky interpolation. Give me the full eye-bleeding jittery extrapolation experience. Ignore the server telling you that anything lower than ratio 1 is monumentally stupid.

Hell, just disable lag compensation alltogether. Play in HARDMODE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP9yrLSL-G0

posted about 4 years ago
#2 14.2 lerp in Q/A Help

There is nothing to fix.
Interp_ratio 1.4 means an interpolation time of 1.4 packet intervals. Because a packet might be a late a value slightly above 1 guarantees that there will always be a packet to interpolate with.
14.2ms interp on a 15ms/66 tickrate server means unless a packet somehow arrives early there will always be a small window where TF2 must extrapolate instead.
TF2 always uses the higher value out of ratio/updaterate and flat interp.

If you want to do it properly set cl_interp_ratio to 0.95 because that's what you're doing.
If you want to lie to yourself that this isn't stupid or need to bypass the sv_client_min_interp_ratio 1, which is set to stop you from doing stupid shit you need to lie to the server and set cl_updaterate 70 (even though a server that runs at 66.6666 ticks per second will never be able to send you 70 updates per second) because 1/70 = 0.0142857 so that's the interp TF2 will use even though it's bullshit.

FYI orange = effective ratio less than 2
yellow = lerp lower than server framerate

Also curious why you'd think movement scripts would affect interp.

posted about 4 years ago
#3527 PC Build Thread in Hardware

Why would it not be possible? Fitting the PSU and cooler is more difficult.

So roughly 2500-3000 SEK.

It's a bit weird to not count the RAM and just hope it works out in the end but you do you.

PCPartPicker Part List

Motherboard: ASRock Fatal1ty B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Mini ITX AM4 Motherboard (kr1354.00 @ CDON SE)
Case: Fractal Design Node 304 Mini ITX Tower Case (kr949.00 @ CDON SE)
Total: kr2303.00
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-11-30 23:43 CET+0100
There are quite a few options for the case.
The Raijintek Ophion would be a bit smaller but pcp doesn't list that. Ophion Evo is almost the same size as the Node 304.

The VRMs on that mobo are ok-ish, but as long as the airflow isn't completely nonexistent that should never become an issue. It's "only" a 6 core and you're not overclocking so they won't be taxed that much anyway.

posted about 4 years ago
#3525 PC Build Thread in Hardware

Yeah, just for mobo and case that's more than enough. You should be able to pick pretty much any case you like.
How small do you want to go? Mini-ITX or just µATX? GPU length?

Actually 250-300€ or the equivalent in funny medieval currency?

Also does that mean you're reusing the RAM or does it just not count towards that budget like the 3600X?

posted about 4 years ago
#3523 PC Build Thread in Hardware

#3522
PCPartPicker Part List

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X ATX LGA1151 Motherboard (£124.95 @ Box Limited)
Storage: Team MP34 1 TB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive (£99.95 @ Overclockers.co.uk)
Total: £224.90
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2019-11-29 22:07 GMT+0000
If you care about onboard sound: https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/product/t8qhP6/msi-mpg-z390-gaming-edge-ac-atx-lga1151-motherboard-mpg-z390-gaming-edge-ac

If you want a 2 TB SSD you could still afford an Intel 660p.

#3523
Seems like a good plan.
Budget?

posted about 5 years ago
#3520 PC Build Thread in Hardware

#3516
The warning about the BIOS is accurate. The rest should work.
You've got enough connectors for two GPUs.
Cooler is included.
If you want a faster GPU get the Nitro+. If you want a slower GPU get a 2060 Super.

#3517
Yep.

#3518
Good.

#3519
Only 17.5 cm width and only 29 cm height mean there are almost no options. Silverstone ML09 would work. Or get a slightly larger bag so ~35 cm height and ~45 cm length or something like that would work.

posted about 5 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ⋅⋅ 229