Is it possible to change the order by which the scoreboard, the spec gui, the f4 ready up and the casual/comp top-of-hud lists are sorted? Preferably all by user ID?
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198020242938 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:59977210] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:29988605 |
Country | France |
Signed Up | November 6, 2012 |
Last Posted | March 2, 2025 at 6:12 PM |
Posts | 856 (0.2 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
Here are all the SOAPDM commands: https://github.com/Lange/SOAP-TF2DM/blob/master/addons/sourcemod/scripting/soap_tf2dm.sp#L134
If you really need, you could open cookies and copy the "pl" cookie from where you're logged in.
serveme.tfSteam login is currently broken on all sites that use it, including the serveme.tf sites. So don’t log out if you’re already logged in ;)
I assume this is why
TwiiKuuenigma give me ssh keys ill do it
please
posted 7 months ago
^
cmon bro ;) i make it look good ;)
spudd+Loose cannon
-Having stickies bounce of team mates that would've saved them, and just watching them die
You mean, you'd want this?
It wouldn't be extremely complicated to make a voice bridge between Mumble and Discord: User runs <your piece of software>, it asks for your Discord logins and then boots a custom, local-only Mumble server where channels are mapped 1:1 with the voice channels that are available on Discord, it could even mimic the people who are speaking so the mumblelay works properly.
This is kinda the only way I'd see a bridge between the two working, you can fake Discord users to a Mumble client but you'd need tons of Discord accounts to fake Mumble users there.
https://i.imgur.com/wmQbNh7.png
Welcome to Page Two
Dogs are great
Hello, this embeds clips and makes this thread 100x better: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/ldesgoui/tftv-embed-clips
You can test before installing by putting this in your URL bar:
javascript:(function()%7Bwhile%20((a%20%3D%20document.querySelector(%22%3Anot(q)%20%3E%20%5Bhref%5E%3D'https%3A%2F%2Fclips.twitch.tv%2F'%5D%22)))%20%7Bvar%20iframe%20%3D%20document.createElement(%22iframe%22)%3Biframe.src%20%3D%20a.href.replace(%22.tv%2F%22%2C%20%22.tv%2Fembed%3Fautoplay%3Dfalse%26clip%3D%22)%3Biframe.allowFullscreen%20%3D%20true%3Biframe.width%20%3D%20a.parentNode.clientWidth%3Biframe.height%20%3D%20iframe.width%20%2F%2016%20*%209%3Ba.parentNode.replaceChild(iframe%2C%20a)%3B%7D%7D)()
For some reason, Chrome removes the javascript: at the start so you might have to type it yourself.
EDIT: doesn't embed in quotes anymore
Userscript fix because that player is pretty old:
https://openuserjs.org/scripts/ldesgoui/tftv-deprecate-streamplayer
I bought OnePlus 1 and 5, the first lasted me 3+ years, it was still very good and very much usable when I changed. Great phones IMO.
Hello,
I, as an interested player, have no readable records of the discussions that lead to these decisions.
This bothers me because I can’t get to know what conflicts arose and who contributed to these discussions, knowing this will help me form a more informed opinion, hopefully convincing me that the decision was the right one. Beyond convincing me, it will give VALVe actual knowledge to sift through.
The gap between the two main philosophies about whitelists is growing too big to be ignored anymore, I’m very uncomfortable seeing people paint the “opposition” as harmful, especially when they're important figures. You're absolutely playing with fire, people will move on.
We all love 6v6 and want it to grow bigger, be taken more seriously, especially by VALVe, it’s irrational to start attacking someone because they aren’t willing to sell out the integrity of the gamemode for hypothetical dev attention.
What bothers me beyond this is that there are better ways to help the gamemode, such as listing bugs that affect the competitive scene, deciding for a global ruleset (even if it's changed soon), and more.
A rigorous and serious effort needs to be made if you want any change to have an undivided following from our players.
My ideal scenario would have a forum (not randomly timed voice meetings, not instant messaging garbage) where people would argue for and against changes. It would contain selected, willing people (as long as everyone in prem/invite is contacted and invited) and be moderated heavily. It would be entirely readable by anyone. It would have clearly defined goals, agreed upon by everyone (there's no point in trying to create a whitelist without a definition of what this whitelist should do).
Thanks for reading and apologies for any confused/confusing sentences.
A better look of current fireball:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/343889520791650304/398659907811016715/image.png
How it actually should be:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/343889520791650304/398660338637340682/image.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/343889520791650304/398660687720874015/image.png
-protoshould I still do an intel build or is this big enough of an issue to do a ryzen build instead?
According to: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.fr/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html , AMD and ARM are also affected. I'd wait a week or two to see how it pans out.
Cute website about the attack from the researchers: https://meltdownattack.com/
Basically, any program's memory can be read and tampered with, additional security *will* slow down processing (think of it like a military checkpoint on the road)
The overhead is estimated to be 20% to 30%