aimbotter in fogs dm

#1

snacks

11 Frags – +

# 26 "Peppers #PepeIsBad" STEAM_0:1:20616925 09:28 47 0 active
R
i can upload a demo if need be, please ban tyvm

#2

viscamus

3 Frags – +

.

#3

snacks

4 Frags – +

Forum Index → General → Off Topic → aimbotter in fogs dm

http://www.filedropper.com/peppers

Forum Index → General → Off Topic → aimbotter in fogs dm

http://www.filedropper.com/peppers

#4

d0m3r

1 Frags – +

thought his aim was sketchy

#5

shrt

8 Frags – +

DETECTIVE SNACKS

#6

Oblivionage

20 Frags – +

who aimbots in a dm server oh my god my mind is blown.

#7

Jstn7477

2 Frags – +

SMAC banned him two days ago on my community for an eye test violation.

http://bans.trashedgamers.org/index.php?p=banlist&advSearch=STEAM_0:1:20616925&advType=steamid&Submit

SMAC banned him two days ago on my community for an eye test violation.

http://bans.trashedgamers.org/index.php?p=banlist&advSearch=STEAM_0:1:20616925&advType=steamid&Submit

#8

Hunt

15 Frags – +

LOL

I know this guy he hangs out with a circlejerk of retards and mges and lobbys all day and thinks hes good rofl

LOL

I know this guy he hangs out with a circlejerk of retards and mges and lobbys all day and thinks hes good rofl

#9

x3

0 Frags – +

he really need to feel superior to aimbot in a dm server. usually, there no total noobs in dm server. How can he be that stupid?!

#10

botmode

-1 Frags – +

Oblivionagewho aimbots in a dm server oh my god my mind is blown.

didn't some high level euro get banned from etf2l for hacking in dm

???

[quote=Oblivionage]who aimbots in a dm server oh my god my mind is blown.[/quote]

didn't some high level euro get banned from etf2l for hacking in dm

???

#11

Oblivionage

-31 Frags – +

#10 please stop my brain can't take in all this autism

#12

Derpus

3 Frags – +

i know this guy
i was fucking around in a lobby and he started showing off so i talked shit
he then asked to mge me i didnt really want to so i pubbed with friends heh
then he joined us and i asked them all if they think he hacks and they agreed

#13

TheSorrow

4 Frags – +

x3he really need to feel superior to aimbot in a dm server. usually, there no total noobs in dm server. How can he be that stupid?!

garry's mod and terraria recently played on his profile, 448 of 448 achievements, prolly just some kid lookin to impress, simple ban.

edit: possible alt of this "pepper" same achievements and games http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096583705

[quote=x3]he really need to feel superior to aimbot in a dm server. usually, there no total noobs in dm server. How can he be that stupid?![/quote]

garry's mod and terraria recently played on his profile, 448 of 448 achievements, prolly just some kid lookin to impress, simple ban.

edit: possible alt of this "pepper" same achievements and games http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096583705

#14

cosa

3 Frags – +

Yeah he was also in stars pub server last night. He plays with someone named "bill" who was also cheating as sniper.

#15

Hunt

0 Frags – +

http://steamcommunity.com/id/meatshot8/ - Bill

I've known these guys for a while and didn't think anything of it rofl

http://steamcommunity.com/id/meatshot8/ - Bill

I've known these guys for a while and didn't think anything of it rofl

#16

zigzter

24 Frags – +

HuntLOL

I know this guy he hangs out with a circlejerk of retards and mges and lobbys all day and thinks hes good rofl

Isn't TF2Lobby one giant circlejerk of retards who think they're good?

[quote=Hunt]LOL

I know this guy he hangs out with a circlejerk of retards and mges and lobbys all day and thinks hes good rofl[/quote]
Isn't TF2Lobby one giant circlejerk of retards who think they're good?

#17

JohnMilter

8 Frags – +

http://www.ugcleague.com/players_page.cfm?player_id=76561198044997215

http://www.ugcleague.com/team_page.cfm?clan_id=4411 team they both played on.

STEAM_0:0:36594528 - peppers first acct. that got vac banned.

http://www.ugcleague.com/players_page.cfm?player_id=76561198044997215

http://www.ugcleague.com/team_page.cfm?clan_id=4411 team they both played on.

STEAM_0:0:36594528 - peppers first acct. that got vac banned.

#18

crespi

2 Frags – +

Can anyone tell me what exactly to look for when watching a demo or spectating someone who is hacking? Sometimes it's very obvious, but often I have a hard time noticing. I'd like to be able to understand this better though. I just watched the peppers demo and I honestly couldn't see anything that made it obvious he was hacking. What exactly should I be looking for? I slowed down the demo, turned on viewmodels and bullet tracers. only thing I did notice was sometimes it looked like his crosshair was making very subtle, stuttery left-right movements.

#19

sherman_gluck

19 Frags – +

you guys care more about people hacking in dm servers and lobbies than people who have been caught cheating and admitted it and are playing in esea and ugc...

#20

seren174

8 Frags – +

Has about 5 "rage" groups he invites u to after u ban him lol

#21

Magikarp

0 Frags – +

thee5orrowx3he really need to feel superior to aimbot in a dm server. usually, there no total noobs in dm server. How can he be that stupid?!
garry's mod and terraria recently played on his profile, 448 of 448 achievements, prolly just some kid lookin to impress, simple ban.

edit: possible alt of this "pepper" same achievements and games http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096583705

Think that's his friend, they're both playing in the same server right now.

[quote=thee5orrow][quote=x3]he really need to feel superior to aimbot in a dm server. usually, there no total noobs in dm server. How can he be that stupid?![/quote]

garry's mod and terraria recently played on his profile, 448 of 448 achievements, prolly just some kid lookin to impress, simple ban.

edit: possible alt of this "pepper" same achievements and games http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096583705[/quote]
Think that's his friend, they're both playing in the same server right now.

#22

ckap

4 Frags – +

Isn't TF2Lobby one giant circlejerk of retards who think they're good?

The sort of people that choose sniper as their main class in a 6v6 lobby? Pretty much.

[quote]Isn't TF2Lobby one giant circlejerk of retards who think they're good?[/quote]
The sort of people that choose sniper as their main class in a 6v6 lobby? Pretty much.

#23

Comanglia

4 Frags – +

A very odd steam group I found...

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/GetDunked

steam group with both "peppers"
http://steamcommunity.com/id/Peppers2swaq
http://steamcommunity.com/id/TheAlmightyPeppers

their's also 2 gavins
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096583705
http://steamcommunity.com/id/Neopharmaphobia

2 people in their with the same profile pic
http://steamcommunity.com/id/scampers
http://steamcommunity.com/id/BEPZINKY

3 accounts that were not set to private with VAC bans on record
http://steamcommunity.com/id/bitchassnigga
http://steamcommunity.com/id/BunnyKilleR
http://steamcommunity.com/id/joseph3114

A lot of these accounts are less than 3 months old.

quite possibly the sketchiest steam group I've seen.

A very odd steam group I found...

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/GetDunked

steam group with both "peppers"
http://steamcommunity.com/id/Peppers2swaq
http://steamcommunity.com/id/TheAlmightyPeppers

their's also 2 gavins
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096583705
http://steamcommunity.com/id/Neopharmaphobia

2 people in their with the same profile pic
http://steamcommunity.com/id/scampers
http://steamcommunity.com/id/BEPZINKY

3 accounts that were not set to private with VAC bans on record
http://steamcommunity.com/id/bitchassnigga
http://steamcommunity.com/id/BunnyKilleR
http://steamcommunity.com/id/joseph3114

A lot of these accounts are less than 3 months old.

quite possibly the sketchiest steam group I've seen.

#24

wareya

8 Frags – +

#18:
Nothing perfect, but there's some general stuff I learned from people studying quake and tf aimbots (humanized ones)

- Inhuman consistency (keeps doing the same things with the same level of success, no overall variation)
[that is, if they keep landing the same kinds of twitches and twitch the same way all the time. if they never have highlights or bad skill moments. if they always do really well right when they're gonna get fucked over. just examples of the underlying idea. this is an extremely specific underlying concept and I just want to make sure people know I'm not saying "they always do well".]
- *Extremely* high accuracy in general with really really really really bad movement
- Perfect tracking
- Crosshair following extremely subtle movements on the target all the time which a legitimate player wouldn't consistently be able to focus on
- Constant sub-100ms reflexes (really hard to tell because of how lag compensation works in spectating. be wary of isolated instances because real people can have special prediction.)

obviously anything that can identify a hack w/ visual testing is iffy, and different things are worse or better at telling and depending on the person doing the test different methods can be essentially subjective.

When someone is using a naive/simple aimbot though it's just fucking blatant.

#18:
Nothing perfect, but there's some general stuff I learned from people studying quake and tf aimbots (humanized ones)

- Inhuman consistency (keeps doing the same things with the same level of success, no overall variation)
[that is, if they keep landing the same kinds of twitches and twitch the same way all the time. if they never have highlights or bad skill moments. if they always do really well right when they're gonna get fucked over. just examples of the underlying idea. this is an extremely specific underlying concept and I just want to make sure people know I'm not saying "they always do well".]
- *Extremely* high accuracy in general with really really really really bad movement
- Perfect tracking
- Crosshair following extremely subtle movements on the target all the time which a legitimate player wouldn't consistently be able to focus on
- Constant sub-100ms reflexes (really hard to tell because of how lag compensation works in spectating. be wary of isolated instances because real people can have special prediction.)

obviously anything that can identify a hack w/ visual testing is iffy, and different things are worse or better at telling and depending on the person doing the test different methods can be essentially subjective.

When someone is using a naive/simple aimbot though it's just fucking blatant.

#25

kawaii

5 Frags – +

http://i.imgur.com/faq9fQO.png

that hat

this "circlejerk" of hackers

http://i.imgur.com/VwdC47R.png

[img]http://i.imgur.com/faq9fQO.png[/img]
that hat

this "circlejerk" of hackers
[img]http://i.imgur.com/VwdC47R.png[/img]

#26

crespi

-1 Frags – +

wareya#18:
Nothing perfect, but there's some general stuff I learned from people studying quake and tf aimbots (humanized ones)

- Inhuman consistency (keeps doing the same things with the same level of success, no overall variation)
[that is, if they keep landing the same kinds of twitches and twitch the same way all the time. if they never have highlights or bad skill moments. if they always do really well right when they're gonna get fucked over. just examples of the underlying idea. this is an extremely specific underlying concept and I just want to make sure people know I'm not saying "they always do well".]
- *Extremely* high accuracy in general with really really really really bad movement
- Perfect tracking
- Crosshair following extremely subtle movements on the target all the time which a legitimate player wouldn't consistently be able to focus on
- Constant sub-100ms reflexes (really hard to tell because of how lag compensation works in spectating. be wary of isolated instances because real people can have special prediction.)

obviously anything that can identify a hack w/ visual testing is iffy, and different things are worse or better at telling and depending on the person doing the test different methods can be essentially subjective.

When someone is using a naive/simple aimbot though it's just fucking blatant.

Thanks for the reply, but most of that stuff I have deduced from playing the game, but that's a really good summary.

I'm more curious about things that (however small and difficult to see) are visible, physically inherent of hacks. I think there are things that you can see when someone is trigger botting, like small twitches in the viewmodel/crosshair, but that's mostly anecdotal. But you know what I mean right?

Or, is the line between intelligent/sophisticated hacks and cheap blatant ones very thin? For instance, if someone is using a very sophisticated hack, is it nearly impossible to discern that they are truly hacking? I'm pretty sure it's very difficult to discern hacks while in spectate, and a POV is much more reliable, right?

Let's use the demo from #3 as an example. I watched it, and I'd be lying if I said I can tell he's hacking.

[quote=wareya]#18:
Nothing perfect, but there's some general stuff I learned from people studying quake and tf aimbots (humanized ones)

- Inhuman consistency (keeps doing the same things with the same level of success, no overall variation)
[that is, if they keep landing the same kinds of twitches and twitch the same way all the time. if they never have highlights or bad skill moments. if they always do really well right when they're gonna get fucked over. just examples of the underlying idea. this is an extremely specific underlying concept and I just want to make sure people know I'm not saying "they always do well".]
- *Extremely* high accuracy in general with really really really really bad movement
- Perfect tracking
- Crosshair following extremely subtle movements on the target all the time which a legitimate player wouldn't consistently be able to focus on
- Constant sub-100ms reflexes (really hard to tell because of how lag compensation works in spectating. be wary of isolated instances because real people can have special prediction.)

obviously anything that can identify a hack w/ visual testing is iffy, and different things are worse or better at telling and depending on the person doing the test different methods can be essentially subjective.

When someone is using a naive/simple aimbot though it's just fucking blatant.[/quote]

Thanks for the reply, but most of that stuff I have deduced from playing the game, but that's a really good summary.

I'm more curious about things that (however small and difficult to see) are visible, physically inherent of hacks. I think there are things that you can see when someone is trigger botting, like small twitches in the viewmodel/crosshair, but that's mostly anecdotal. But you know what I mean right?

Or, is the line between intelligent/sophisticated hacks and cheap blatant ones very thin? For instance, if someone is using a very sophisticated hack, is it nearly impossible to discern that they are truly hacking? I'm pretty sure it's very difficult to discern hacks while in spectate, and a POV is much more reliable, right?

Let's use the demo from #3 as an example. I watched it, and I'd be lying if I said I can tell he's hacking.

#27

Maxxuss

6 Frags – +

Funny thing, I was actually on a arena server today with this guy and I managed to snag a few demos of him doing insane shots and having basically consistent headshots with both ambassador and sniper rifle. Here are some demos for anyone interested, the names of the demos basically describe the demo as a whole. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7002247/The%20Peppers%20Pentalogy.rar

#28

demise

8 Frags – +

It's about time we had one of these threads :>

#29

enigma

15 Frags – +

oh this guy

yeah he used to cheat all the time on west coast mge servers

oh this guy

yeah he used to cheat all the time on west coast mge servers

#30

Davidchoi

3 Frags – +

oh god, this guy, i played on a team with this guy in ugc 6's, he and his buddy(gavin) would shitalk in mumble, shitalking the other team, and be an annoying asshole. don't even know why or how i got him on the team.