If there is usually 2 super teams in in invite, and then there is usually 2 solid teams right behind and sometimes another alright 2 teams, shouldn't it be best to have maybe 6 teams in invite and have a more competitive season? Just an idea to not have any teams die and have more competition other than lan and the 4th lan spot.
Invite
posted in
TF2 General Discussion
If there is usually 2 super teams in in invite, and then there is usually 2 solid teams right behind and sometimes another alright 2 teams, shouldn't it be best to have maybe 6 teams in invite and have a more competitive season? Just an idea to not have any teams die and have more competition other than lan and the 4th lan spot.
holy fuck can we just scrap the term 'super team' there is no such thing, one team is usually more dominant than the others, that's the way it works in e-sports. shocker i know!
holy fuck can we just scrap the term 'super team' there is no such thing, one team is usually more dominant than the others, that's the way it works in e-sports. shocker i know!
ESEA prolly won't be able to give everyone a free trip to dallas and funding would be even harder to get
ESEA prolly won't be able to give everyone a free trip to dallas and funding would be even harder to get
Whoopee_CushionI thought invite was expanding a lot next season
allegedly
[quote=Whoopee_Cushion]I thought invite was expanding a lot next season[/quote]allegedly
dfyholy fuck can we just scrap the term 'super team' there is no such thing, one team is usually more dominant than the others, that's the way it works in e-sports. shocker i know!
The OP posts isn't right.
But i'm actually curious is this how e-sports usually are? Quake usually has rapha as a dominant force however he doesn't always win by an means, and there are 2-3 others that can compete with him. Wc3 Dota is usually faovred towards asian teams, but among them it can go either way. And Dota 2 is pretty similar i believe(maybe iG is dominant idk haven't been keeping up with asian dota 2 to much). I have no clue about sc2 but i hear it goes either way pretty often. if you want to count it, CoD, and Halo(2) went either way as well. Oh and i believe LoL is pretty much the same way with iG and whoever the other asian teams are, being pretty even.
And for the lesser known scene's that i know about, AoE2 is still a decade later spit between like 6 people(the games are so damn close they now play a best of 21 to try and determine someone who's truly better) Tribes is pretty close among the top teams, SMNC is pretty close, urban terror was insanely close between the top teams until it's death.
I mean maybe i'm missing something but not every game is basically "you can tell at the begining of the season who'll be top 2, and who'll most lkely win LAN." also sorry i know nothing about CS so i can't speak about it.
[quote=dfy]holy fuck can we just scrap the term 'super team' there is no such thing, one team is usually more dominant than the others, that's the way it works in e-sports. shocker i know![/quote]
The OP posts isn't right.
But i'm actually curious is this how e-sports usually are? Quake usually has rapha as a dominant force however he doesn't always win by an means, and there are 2-3 others that can compete with him. Wc3 Dota is usually faovred towards asian teams, but among them it can go either way. And Dota 2 is pretty similar i believe(maybe iG is dominant idk haven't been keeping up with asian dota 2 to much). I have no clue about sc2 but i hear it goes either way pretty often. if you want to count it, CoD, and Halo(2) went either way as well. Oh and i believe LoL is pretty much the same way with iG and whoever the other asian teams are, being pretty even.
And for the lesser known scene's that i know about, AoE2 is still a decade later spit between like 6 people(the games are so damn close they now play a best of 21 to try and determine someone who's truly better) Tribes is pretty close among the top teams, SMNC is pretty close, urban terror was insanely close between the top teams until it's death.
I mean maybe i'm missing something but not every game is basically "you can tell at the begining of the season who'll be top 2, and who'll most lkely win LAN." also sorry i know nothing about CS so i can't speak about it.
The OP posts isn't right.
But i'm actually curious is this how e-sports usually are? Quake usually has rapha as a dominant force however he doesn't always win by an means, and there are 2-3 others that can compete with him. Wc3 Dota is usually faovred towards asian teams, but among them it can go either way. And Dota 2 is pretty similar i believe(maybe iG is dominant idk haven't been keeping up with asian dota 2 to much). I have no clue about sc2 but i hear it goes either way pretty often. if you want to count it, CoD, and Halo(2) went either way as well. Oh and i believe LoL is pretty much the same way with iG and whoever the other asian teams are, being pretty even.
And for the lesser known scene's that i know about, AoE2 is still a decade later spit between like 6 people(the games are so damn close they now play a best of 21 to try and determine someone who's truly better) Tribes is pretty close among the top teams, SMNC is pretty close, urban terror was insanely close between the top teams until it's death.
I mean maybe i'm missing something but not every game is basically "you can tell at the begining of the season who'll be top 2, and who'll most lkely win LAN." also sorry i know nothing about CS so i can't speak about it.
Please
sign in through STEAM
to post a comment.