Upvote Upvoted 22 Downvote Downvoted
1 2
Youtube founder first YT comment in 8 years
posted in Off Topic
1
#1
21 Frags +

http://www.youtube.com/user/jawed/feed

Show Content
yes I saw it on rebbit
http://www.youtube.com/user/jawed/feed

[spoiler][size=10]yes I saw it on rebbit[/size][/spoiler]
2
#2
13 Frags +

the whole google+ thing is so stupid. i mean, i know google is trying to clean up the (horrible horrible) quality of comments but this is not the way to do it

also just a small note, the official announcement video has 1400 likes and 18,000 dislikes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVGp8Z8Yb28

the whole google+ thing is so stupid. i mean, i know google is trying to clean up the (horrible horrible) quality of comments but this is not the way to do it

also just a small note, the official announcement video has 1400 likes and 18,000 dislikes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVGp8Z8Yb28
3
#3
3 Frags +

If they had just blatantly stolen the layout of reddit comments and reddit's account system it would be fine.

If they had just blatantly stolen the layout of reddit comments and reddit's account system it would be fine.
4
#4
9 Frags +

I actually didn't care much when the layout was changed. But they're making you have a google+ account to do anything. I've no idea why are they still on the retarded idea that everyone likes g+ which is simply shit.

I actually didn't care much when the layout was changed. But they're making you have a google+ account to do anything. I've no idea why are they still on the retarded idea that everyone likes g+ which is simply shit.
5
#5
1 Frags +
mthsadthe whole google+ thing is so stupid. i mean, i know google is trying to clean up the (horrible horrible) quality of comments but this is not the way to do it

If you look at it from another perspective this is also a way to give companies more voice in the comment sections and simply hide the public opinion, meaning they will certainly get more advertising revenue and companies betting hard on google+, since it now gives priority to google+ accounts comments.

From the last 3-4 videos I have seen in the technology field the top comment is always either by the Intel, AMD, or Microsoft google plus page, meaning that those brands already have an establishing following and just commenting on something through google plus gives them instant top spot in the video comment sections.

Pretty smart from google from a business point of view, pretty dumb from them from a costumer service point of view, you cant just neglect your userbase and so thoroughly ignore them

[quote=mthsad]the whole google+ thing is so stupid. i mean, i know google is trying to clean up the (horrible horrible) quality of comments but this is not the way to do it[/quote]
If you look at it from another perspective this is also a way to give companies more voice in the comment sections and simply hide the public opinion, meaning they will certainly get more advertising revenue and companies betting hard on google+, since it now gives priority to google+ accounts comments.

From the last 3-4 videos I have seen in the technology field the top comment is always either by the Intel, AMD, or Microsoft google plus page, meaning that those brands already have an establishing following and just commenting on something through google plus gives them instant top spot in the video comment sections.

Pretty smart from google from a business point of view, pretty dumb from them from a costumer service point of view, you cant just neglect your userbase and so thoroughly ignore them
6
#6
0 Frags +

I for one, embrace the destruction of Facebook and accept our new Google overlord.

I for one, embrace the destruction of Facebook and accept our new Google overlord.
7
#7
8 Frags +

I don't know if anyone noticed but if you click on a timecode on someones comment it now opens in a new tab instead of jumping to that particular time.

I don't know if anyone noticed but if you click on a timecode on someones comment it now opens in a new tab instead of jumping to that particular time.
8
#8
9 Frags +

I think what is going to happen is so predictable. People are gonna sign up and sign in to goolge+ only to comment on youtube videos, so google+ will now be the house of every youtube comment and still a piece of shit that no one is gonna actually use to communicate with their friends.

I think what is going to happen is so predictable. People are gonna sign up and sign in to goolge+ only to comment on youtube videos, so google+ will now be the house of every youtube comment and still a piece of shit that no one is gonna actually use to communicate with their friends.
9
#9
0 Frags +

they increased the difficulty of making a comment without actually making the comments any better

they increased the difficulty of making a comment without actually making the comments any better
10
#10
9 Frags +

who the hell comments on youtube anyway

who the hell comments on youtube anyway
11
#11
26 Frags +

every time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke

every time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke
12
#12
19 Frags +
kevevery time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke

"We'll ask again later."

[quote=kev]every time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke[/quote] "We'll ask again later."
13
#13
0 Frags +

I would be surprised if they don't undo the change. They must know by now that people don't like the new comments.

I would be surprised if they don't undo the change. They must know by now that people don't like the new comments.
14
#14
14 Frags +

.

.
15
#15
4 Frags +

dude thats hilarious LMFAO

dude thats hilarious LMFAO
16
#16
5 Frags +
viscamuslol when has youtube ever reverted because people didn't like it

Google's name is now associated with it. Before it was just "I hate the new youtube layout" now people are complaining because they need a Google+ account. Most people don't know that Google makes all of the youtube changes. We will have to wait and see what they do.

[quote=viscamus]lol when has youtube ever reverted because people didn't like it[/quote]
Google's name is now associated with it. Before it was just "I hate the new youtube layout" now people are complaining because they need a [b]Google[/b]+ account. Most people don't know that Google makes all of the youtube changes. We will have to wait and see what they do.
17
#17
6 Frags +

http://www.youtube.com/feather_beta

there, now you can pretend youtube comments don't exist AND that this ass-tastic update never happened at the same time.

e: on another note I think it's kind of funny when people in comments sections link to petitions and post giant rants about how much the new comment system sucks because those are two things that they wouldn't be able to do with the old comment system which didn't allow links or >500 chars. it's got some perks honestly. the only things that sucks about it is how hard google is trying to push g+

http://www.youtube.com/feather_beta

there, now you can pretend youtube comments don't exist AND that this ass-tastic update never happened at the same time.

e: on another note I think it's kind of funny when people in comments sections link to petitions and post giant rants about how much the new comment system sucks because those are two things that they wouldn't be able to do with the old comment system which didn't allow links or >500 chars. it's got some perks honestly. the only things that sucks about it is how hard google is trying to push g+
18
#18
-8 Frags +

Google+ doesn't suck in my opinion, actually I think it's drastically better and cleaner than Facebook, Twitter, and other popular sites. People just dislike it because their friends are not on it.

Google knows that people won't ever leave Youtube, so they're using this as an opportunity to expand the google empire further, and I can't say I blame them. If it doesn't work out as they planned, they can change it back, and they won't face any repercussions from it.

Also, why is the Youtube Co-founder complaining about something it appears he hasn't used for the past years? It's like complaining about AOL service in 2013- it's seems irrelevant.

Google+ doesn't suck in my opinion, actually I think it's drastically better and cleaner than Facebook, Twitter, and other popular sites. People just dislike it because their friends are not on it.

Google knows that people won't ever leave Youtube, so they're using this as an opportunity to expand the google empire further, and I can't say I blame them. If it doesn't work out as they planned, they can change it back, and they won't face any repercussions from it.

Also, why is the Youtube [i]Co-founder[/i] complaining about something it appears he hasn't used for the past years? It's like complaining about AOL service in 2013- it's seems irrelevant.
19
#19
7 Frags +
boppetPeople just dislike it because their friends are not on it.

No, I dislike it because it's being forced on me. I refuse to use the fucking thing out of principle.

[quote=boppet]People just dislike it because their friends are not on it.[/quote]
No, I dislike it because it's being forced on me. I refuse to use the fucking thing out of principle.
20
#20
-7 Frags +
boppet
Also, why is the Youtube Co-founder complaining about something it appears he hasn't used for the past years? It's like complaining about AOL service in 2013- it's seems irrelevant.

He's doing it for the +frags since he doesn't have a blue name anymore

[quote=boppet]

Also, why is the Youtube [i]Co-founder[/i] complaining about something it appears he hasn't used for the past years? It's like complaining about AOL service in 2013- it's seems irrelevant.[/quote]

He's doing it for the +frags since he doesn't have a blue name anymore
21
#21
1 Frags +

you also need to have an account to see notifications that new comments have been posted on your videos.

you also need to have an account to see notifications that new comments have been posted on your videos.
22
#22
2 Frags +
mthsadthe whole google+ thing is so stupid. i mean, i know google is trying to clean up the (horrible horrible) quality of comments but this is not the way to do it

also just a small note, the official announcement video has 1400 likes and 18,000 dislikes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVGp8Z8Yb28
The new YouTube comments are AWESOME. I have made several videos praising Google on the the Google+ / YouTube integration. The haters are a sign of how selfish society is. Google gives us an amazing FREE platform to post our content, and even get paid. And these haters have not appreciation.

The shilling never ends.

PlatypusIf they had just blatantly stolen the layout of reddit comments and reddit's account system it would be fine.

Reddit's comment system is shit.

boppetGoogle+ doesn't suck in my opinion, actually I think it's drastically better and cleaner than Facebook, Twitter, and other popular sites. People just dislike it because their friends are not on it.

Google knows that people won't ever leave Youtube, so they're using this as an opportunity to expand the google empire further, and I can't say I blame them. If it doesn't work out as they planned, they can change it back, and they won't face any repercussions from it.

Also, why is the Youtube Co-founder complaining about something it appears he hasn't used for the past years? It's like complaining about AOL service in 2013- it's seems irrelevant.

The only good thing about this is the comment nesting if 1 comment has a lot of replies. Other than that, this thing is fucking stupid and it's obvious they are trying to promote G+. They've been asking me to use my real name for over a year now and constantly ask me to sign up.

Why is that guy complaining? Because he comes back to see his creation turned into a horrible nightmare. YT wasn't created for evil intentions, but it's obvious that that's what Google is trying to do.

[quote=mthsad]the whole google+ thing is so stupid. i mean, i know google is trying to clean up the (horrible horrible) quality of comments but this is not the way to do it

also just a small note, the official announcement video has 1400 likes and 18,000 dislikes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVGp8Z8Yb28[/quote]

[quote]The new YouTube comments are AWESOME. I have made several videos praising Google on the the Google+ / YouTube integration. The haters are a sign of how selfish society is. Google gives us an amazing FREE platform to post our content, and even get paid. And these haters have not appreciation. [/quote]

The shilling never ends.

[quote=Platypus]If they had just blatantly stolen the layout of reddit comments and reddit's account system it would be fine.[/quote]

Reddit's comment system is shit.

[quote=boppet]Google+ doesn't suck in my opinion, actually I think it's drastically better and cleaner than Facebook, Twitter, and other popular sites. People just dislike it because their friends are not on it.

Google knows that people won't ever leave Youtube, so they're using this as an opportunity to expand the google empire further, and I can't say I blame them. If it doesn't work out as they planned, they can change it back, and they won't face any repercussions from it.

Also, why is the Youtube [i]Co-founder[/i] complaining about something it appears he hasn't used for the past years? It's like complaining about AOL service in 2013- it's seems irrelevant.[/quote]

The only good thing about this is the comment nesting if 1 comment has a lot of replies. Other than that, this thing is fucking stupid and it's obvious they are trying to promote G+. They've been asking me to use my real name for over a year now and constantly ask me to sign up.

Why is that guy complaining? Because he comes back to see his creation turned into a horrible nightmare. YT wasn't created for evil intentions, but it's obvious that that's what Google is trying to do.
23
#23
3 Frags +

thank god that i don't connect my youtube to my primary email address

thank god that i don't connect my youtube to my primary email address
24
#24
2 Frags +

https://www.change.org/petitions/google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-form#share

https://www.change.org/petitions/google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-form#share
25
#25
-2 Frags +
kevevery time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke

If you think about it, getting people to use their real name is a genius idea. Imagine everyone on Youtube used their real name. There would be a significantly less trolling, abhorrent racism and merciless raging: anonymity has allowed people to hide behind their PC's and verbally attack people without fear of consequences, and actual names will obviously deter that.

Companies would even be more willing to display their content on Youtube if it wasn't for the absolutely disgraceful and belligerent community that it houses. ESPN, NBC, FOX, CBS, and etc. could easily make a Youtube-based web joint where they could deliver content online, but they won't, because taking the Youtube community seriously is almost impossible.

Also, Youtube may be running out of usernames. There might be massively long combinations of names people can use, but they are starting to become unintelligible because newcomers to Youtube can't pick the names that they would like. So instead, they just pick names like "kejfwbibvwlooooool234" or "cooochiemaneskimo9". It gets even more difficult to pick a name because people also make multiple accounts. If Youtube lasts as long as we expect it to, in a few years, name combinations will run scarce, as opposed to sites like Facebook and Twitter - who don't tell you that your name is taken because well, it's your name. In terms of usernames, Google/Youtube made a good choice.

The Google+ forced integration is a good business decision, but it does ultimately take a lot of enjoyment and time out of the regular person.

Usernames= good choice
Google+ Integration= kind of a pain

[quote=kev]every time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke[/quote]
If you think about it, getting people to use their real name is a genius idea. Imagine everyone on Youtube used their real name. There would be a significantly less trolling, abhorrent racism and merciless raging: anonymity has allowed people to hide behind their PC's and verbally attack people without fear of consequences, and actual names will obviously deter that.

Companies would even be more willing to display their content on Youtube if it wasn't for the absolutely disgraceful and belligerent community that it houses. ESPN, NBC, FOX, CBS, and etc. could easily make a Youtube-based web joint where they could deliver content online, but they won't, because taking the Youtube community seriously is almost impossible.

Also, Youtube may be running out of usernames. There might be massively long combinations of names people can use, but they are starting to become unintelligible because newcomers to Youtube can't pick the names that they would like. So instead, they just pick names like "kejfwbibvwlooooool234" or "cooochiemaneskimo9". It gets even more difficult to pick a name because people also make multiple accounts. If Youtube lasts as long as we expect it to, in a few years, name combinations will run scarce, as opposed to sites like Facebook and Twitter - who don't tell you that your name is taken because well, it's your name. In terms of usernames, Google/Youtube made a good choice.

The Google+ forced integration is a good business decision, but it does ultimately take a lot of enjoyment and time out of the regular person.

Usernames= good choice
Google+ Integration= kind of a pain
26
#26
1 Frags +

so basically someone who hasn't posted a comment in 8 years is complaining that he has to have a google+ account to post comments? WHAT COMMENTS?

so basically someone who hasn't posted a comment in 8 years is complaining that he has to have a google+ account to post comments? WHAT COMMENTS?
27
#27
-4 Frags +
Bubbahttps://www.change.org/petitions/google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-form#share

Goes to show that our society can't handle a luxury pulled away from them in the slightest. It's sad really, seeing the outrage over something so trivial and infinitesimal to actual reality.

Privacy may be a government-issued right, but Youtube is a societal privilege. It's like someone giving you a free car, then they come back in three months to put a dent in it. You can't complain.

[quote=Bubba]https://www.change.org/petitions/google-change-the-youtube-comment-section-back-to-its-original-form#share[/quote]
Goes to show that our society can't handle a luxury pulled away from them in the slightest. It's sad really, seeing the outrage over something so trivial and infinitesimal to actual reality.

Privacy may be a government-issued right, but Youtube is a societal privilege. It's like someone giving you a free car, then they come back in three months to put a dent in it. You can't complain.
28
#28
0 Frags +

I can't use my real name to comment on weed videos man

I can't let people know

I can't use my real name to comment on weed videos man

I can't let people know
29
#29
1 Frags +
boppetkevevery time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke
If you think about it, getting people to use their real name is a genius idea. Imagine everyone on Youtube used their real name. There would be a significantly less trolling, abhorrent racism and merciless raging: anonymity has allowed people to hide behind their PC's and verbally attack people without fear of consequences, and actual names will obviously deter that.

Companies would even be more willing to display their content on Youtube if it wasn't for the absolutely disgraceful and belligerent community that it houses. ESPN, NBC, FOX, CBS, and etc. could easily make a Youtube-based web joint where they could deliver content online, but they won't, because taking the Youtube community seriously is almost impossible.

Also, Youtube may be running out of usernames. There might be massively long combinations of names people can use, but they are starting to become unintelligible because newcomers to Youtube can't pick the names that they would like. So instead, they just pick names like "kejfwbibvwlooooool234" or "cooochiemaneskimo9". It gets even more difficult to pick a name because people also make multiple accounts. If Youtube lasts as long as we expect it to, in a few years, name combinations will run scarce, as opposed to sites like Facebook and Twitter - who don't tell you that your name is taken because well, it's your name. In terms of usernames, Google/Youtube made a good choice.

The Google+ forced integration is a good business decision, but it does ultimately take a lot of enjoyment and time out of the regular person.

Usernames= good choice
Google+ Integration= kind of a pain

or we can make it so usernames don't run out and multiple people can have the same username but have unique id's or profiles like steam does. also i don't think using our names is gonna change the personalities of people because they'll make seperate g+'s without their names so they can still use the same language or whatever.

[quote=boppet][quote=kev]every time I sign in to youtube they try to get me to use my real name

what a joke[/quote]
If you think about it, getting people to use their real name is a genius idea. Imagine everyone on Youtube used their real name. There would be a significantly less trolling, abhorrent racism and merciless raging: anonymity has allowed people to hide behind their PC's and verbally attack people without fear of consequences, and actual names will obviously deter that.

Companies would even be more willing to display their content on Youtube if it wasn't for the absolutely disgraceful and belligerent community that it houses. ESPN, NBC, FOX, CBS, and etc. could easily make a Youtube-based web joint where they could deliver content online, but they won't, because taking the Youtube community seriously is almost impossible.

Also, Youtube may be running out of usernames. There might be massively long combinations of names people can use, but they are starting to become unintelligible because newcomers to Youtube can't pick the names that they would like. So instead, they just pick names like "kejfwbibvwlooooool234" or "cooochiemaneskimo9". It gets even more difficult to pick a name because people also make multiple accounts. If Youtube lasts as long as we expect it to, in a few years, name combinations will run scarce, as opposed to sites like Facebook and Twitter - who don't tell you that your name is taken because well, it's your name. In terms of usernames, Google/Youtube made a good choice.

The Google+ forced integration is a good business decision, but it does ultimately take a lot of enjoyment and time out of the regular person.

Usernames= good choice
Google+ Integration= kind of a pain[/quote]

or we can make it so usernames don't run out and multiple people can have the same username but have unique id's or profiles like steam does. also i don't think using our names is gonna change the personalities of people because they'll make seperate g+'s without their names so they can still use the same language or whatever.
30
#30
0 Frags +

I just made my google+ account my steam name, who the fuck actually uses that shit?

I just made my google+ account my steam name, who the fuck actually uses that shit?
1 2
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.