Upvote Upvoted 2 Downvote Downvoted
$249 AOC 144hz monitor
posted in Hardware
1
#1
0 Frags +

AOC G2460PQU 144hz 1ms 24" monitor for $249.99 on newegg right now. read some really good things about this monitor comparing it to the ASUS and BENQ 144hz monitors. AOC is a pretty good monitor brand afaik.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160177&cm_re=AOC_G2460PQU-_-24-160-177-_-Product

AOC G2460PQU 144hz 1ms 24" monitor for $249.99 on newegg right now. read some really good things about this monitor comparing it to the ASUS and BENQ 144hz monitors. AOC is a pretty good monitor brand afaik.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160177&cm_re=AOC_G2460PQU-_-24-160-177-_-Product
2
#2
0 Frags +

The ASUS is $251 on Amazon

The ASUS is $251 on Amazon
3
#3
0 Frags +

No Lightboost.
Colours are a bit better than the ASUS VG248QE afaik.

No Lightboost.
Colours are a bit better than the ASUS VG248QE afaik.
4
#4
0 Frags +
SetsulNo Lightboost.

Lightboost isn't terribly helpful over 144Hz, sure it's smoother but really dim, has poor colors and the pixel gtg is 2ms slower. But having the option there is always better and the BenQ 2411z costs barely more and has that feature.

Also
"Has to warm up when on 144Hz before the contrast isn't so blown out. but once its done it looks great." From a newegg review

Seems a bit odd.

[quote=Setsul]No Lightboost.[/quote]

Lightboost isn't terribly helpful over 144Hz, sure it's smoother but really dim, has poor colors and the pixel gtg is 2ms slower. But having the option there is always better and the BenQ 2411z costs barely more and has that feature.

Also
"Has to warm up when on 144Hz before the contrast isn't so blown out. but once its done it looks great." From a newegg review

Seems a bit odd.
5
#5
0 Frags +

ya that's really odd, lightboost is bad anyways though setsul.

ya that's really odd, lightboost is bad anyways though setsul.
6
#6
0 Frags +

I can't write down all the pros and cons of lightboost everytime I comment on a monitor having/not having lightboost ;-)
OP compared it to monitors with lightboost so I had to mention it. Can't compare something if you ignore the differences.

Not sure how the slower gtg is relevant, motion blur comes mostly from persistence on fast LCDs. Otherwise strobing wouldn't make sense.

Warm up is perfectly normal.

I can't write down all the pros and cons of lightboost everytime I comment on a monitor having/not having lightboost ;-)
OP compared it to monitors with lightboost so I had to mention it. Can't compare something if you ignore the differences.


Not sure how the slower gtg is relevant, motion blur comes mostly from persistence on fast LCDs. Otherwise strobing wouldn't make sense.

Warm up is perfectly normal.
7
#7
0 Frags +

Thought I'd update this thread with what looks like a pretty decent deal

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009642
ACER
1ms GTG
24"
Lightboost Ready

$219.99

I do know a similar 120Hz Model from Acer had some awful input lag but that might be (and most likely) isn't true about the 144Hz model.

-edit-
Just noticed they also have a $20 off promotion with this code EMCWWWW239 effectively making the price $199.99

Amazon Link: $199.99 http://www.amazon.com/Acer-GN246HL-Bbid-24-inch-Widescreen/dp/B00KO4518I

Thought I'd update this thread with what looks like a pretty decent deal

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009642
ACER
1ms GTG
24"
Lightboost Ready

$219.99

I do know a similar 120Hz Model from Acer had some awful input lag but that might be (and most likely) isn't true about the 144Hz model.

-edit-
Just noticed they also have a $20 off promotion with this code EMCWWWW239 effectively making the price $199.99

Amazon Link: $199.99 http://www.amazon.com/Acer-GN246HL-Bbid-24-inch-Widescreen/dp/B00KO4518I?tag=teamfortresst-20
8
#8
0 Frags +

Got the lower end model of this myself, the G2490FQ, and it's alright. The colours are decent and it works fine.

The only problem I've really had is that it only works in 144hz on displayport, not over DVI Dual Link. Not sure how common of a problem it is, could just be a one-off problem with this unit.

I'd recommend it, but with the smaller difference in price with other 144hz screens in the US than in the UK (This monitor cost me about £180, the Asus VG248QE is about £250), you might be better off spending a little more to get the option of stuff like lightboost.

Got the lower end model of this myself, the G2490FQ, and it's alright. The colours are decent and it works fine.

The only problem I've really had is that it only works in 144hz on displayport, not over DVI Dual Link. Not sure how common of a problem it is, could just be a one-off problem with this unit.

I'd recommend it, but with the smaller difference in price with other 144hz screens in the US than in the UK (This monitor cost me about £180, the Asus VG248QE is about £250), you might be better off spending a little more to get the option of stuff like lightboost.
9
#9
-1 Frags +

Acer has input lag right?

Acer has input lag right?
10
#10
-1 Frags +
FlappyGot the lower end model of this myself, the G2490FQ, and it's alright. The colours are decent and it works fine.

The only problem I've really had is that it only works in 144hz on displayport, not over DVI Dual Link. Not sure how common of a problem it is, could just be a one-off problem with this unit.

I'd recommend it, but with the smaller difference in price with other 144hz screens in the US than in the UK (This monitor cost me about £180, the Asus VG248QE is about £250), you might be better off spending a little more to get the option of stuff like lightboost.

I'm pretty sure I remember reading that dual link DVI can't handle 144Hz @ 1920x1080. Pretty sure that's just a technical limitation of DVI itself. Shouldn't be an issue though; most people who are using 144Hz monitors should probably have gpus that support displayport.

[quote=Flappy]Got the lower end model of this myself, the G2490FQ, and it's alright. The colours are decent and it works fine.

The only problem I've really had is that it only works in 144hz on displayport, not over DVI Dual Link. Not sure how common of a problem it is, could just be a one-off problem with this unit.

I'd recommend it, but with the smaller difference in price with other 144hz screens in the US than in the UK (This monitor cost me about £180, the Asus VG248QE is about £250), you might be better off spending a little more to get the option of stuff like lightboost.[/quote]
I'm pretty sure I remember reading that dual link DVI can't handle 144Hz @ 1920x1080. Pretty sure that's just a technical limitation of DVI itself. Shouldn't be an issue though; most people who are using 144Hz monitors should probably have gpus that support displayport.
11
#11
1 Frags +
Dave_I'm pretty sure I remember reading that dual link DVI can't handle 144Hz @ 1920x1080. Pretty sure that's just a technical limitation of DVI itself.

Yes it can

[quote=Dave_]I'm pretty sure I remember reading that dual link DVI can't handle 144Hz @ 1920x1080. Pretty sure that's just a technical limitation of DVI itself. [/quote]

Yes it can
12
#12
0 Frags +
ulmyxxAcer has input lag right?

The 120Hz one did. According to this test, the 144Hz one has the lowest response times, but has other problems.

[quote=ulmyxx]Acer has input lag right?[/quote]
The 120Hz one did. According to [url=http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/monitors/2014/07/21/gaming-monitor-roundup-2014/16]this test[/url], the 144Hz one has the lowest response times, but has other problems.
13
#13
1 Frags +

I have the VG248QE, lightboost makes some games so much darker I have to use gamma ramp. I've since stuck to 144Hz instead of 120Hz lightboost. If the colors are better (I like my old Samsung monitor's colors much better than the VG248QE) then I'd say it's not a bad deal.

I have the VG248QE, lightboost makes some games so much darker I have to use gamma ramp. I've since stuck to 144Hz instead of 120Hz lightboost. If the colors are better (I like my old Samsung monitor's colors much better than the VG248QE) then I'd say it's not a bad deal.
14
#14
0 Frags +
brownymasterI have the VG248QE, lightboost makes some games so much darker I have to use gamma ramp. I've since stuck to 144Hz instead of 120Hz lightboost. If the colors are better (I like my old Samsung monitor's colors much better than the VG248QE) then I'd say it's not a bad deal.

I mean gamma ramps aren't always a bad thing. If they're not sticking in fullscreen, use this: http://goebish.free.fr/cpk/

[quote=brownymaster]I have the VG248QE, lightboost makes some games so much darker I have to use gamma ramp. I've since stuck to 144Hz instead of 120Hz lightboost. If the colors are better (I like my old Samsung monitor's colors much better than the VG248QE) then I'd say it's not a bad deal.[/quote]
I mean gamma ramps aren't always a bad thing. If they're not sticking in fullscreen, use this: http://goebish.free.fr/cpk/
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.