PankeymanAlex Jones was right all along lmao
Show Content
Donald Trump
posted in
World Events
[quote=Pankeyman][url=https://youtu.be/gSlN87bhYzU]Alex Jones was right all along lmao[/url][/quote]
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIl_BNIJcFg[/spoiler]
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIl_BNIJcFg[/spoiler]
I can't wait until Tuesday when Rand Paul becomes President.
I can't wait until Tuesday when Rand Paul becomes President.
SearchlightSince we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.
no, 538's biggest "flaw" rn is not factoring in early voting or GOTV efforts, both of which seem to be helping Clinton
[quote=Searchlight]Since we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.[/quote]
no, 538's biggest "flaw" rn is not factoring in early voting or GOTV efforts, both of which seem to be helping Clinton
no, 538's biggest "flaw" rn is not factoring in early voting or GOTV efforts, both of which seem to be helping Clinton
CollaideNub_DanishCollaide He doesn't care about outsourced jobs, if he did, he wouldn't produce his own ties in china.
You don't get to be a billionaire by making bad business decisions, spending 10 times more to produce something is a bad business decision. People seem to dislike trump because hes against free trade because the usa is losing out in a free market against places that can produce things much cheaper, he talks constantly about imposing tarifs to help the us work force.
How fucking thick are you? I already tackled all of these points.
you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings
[quote=Collaide][quote=Nub_Danish][quote=Collaide] He doesn't care about outsourced jobs, if he did, he wouldn't produce his own ties in china.[/quote]
You don't get to be a billionaire by making bad business decisions, spending 10 times more to produce something is a bad business decision. People seem to dislike trump because hes against free trade because the usa is losing out in a free market against places that can produce things much cheaper, he talks constantly about imposing tarifs to help the us work force.[/quote]
How fucking thick are you? I already tackled all of these points.[/quote]
you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings
You don't get to be a billionaire by making bad business decisions, spending 10 times more to produce something is a bad business decision. People seem to dislike trump because hes against free trade because the usa is losing out in a free market against places that can produce things much cheaper, he talks constantly about imposing tarifs to help the us work force.[/quote]
How fucking thick are you? I already tackled all of these points.[/quote]
you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings
PankeymanAlex Jones was right all along lmao
http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/40/768x384/gallery-1475607949-alex4.jpg
when was this beefcake ever wrong?
[quote=Pankeyman][url=https://youtu.be/gSlN87bhYzU]Alex Jones was right all along lmao[/url][/quote]
[img]http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/40/768x384/gallery-1475607949-alex4.jpg[/img]
when was this beefcake ever wrong?
[img]http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/40/768x384/gallery-1475607949-alex4.jpg[/img]
when was this beefcake ever wrong?
Nub_Danish you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
CollaideAgain, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
Nub_Danish you stated your feelings
Libtards and their fee-fees right xD
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings[/quote]
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
[quote=Collaide]Again, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.[/quote]
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you stated your feelings[/quote]
Libtards and their fee-fees right [b]xD[/b]
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
[quote=Collaide]Again, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.[/quote]
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you stated your feelings[/quote]
Libtards and their fee-fees right [b]xD[/b]
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.
Apparently there was some potential threat that caused secret service to jump up on stage and rush Trump off stage at a rally. Crazy.
Apparently there was some potential threat that caused secret service to jump up on stage and rush Trump off stage at a rally. Crazy.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/breaking-donald-trump-rushed-off-stage-at-nevada-rally-by-secret-service/
http://www.mediaite.com/online/breaking-donald-trump-rushed-off-stage-at-nevada-rally-by-secret-service/
remedyPankeymanAlex Jones was right all along lmaohttp://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/40/768x384/gallery-1475607949-alex4.jpg
when was this beefcake ever wrong?
Posting from a FEMA camp rn!
[quote=remedy][quote=Pankeyman][url=https://youtu.be/gSlN87bhYzU]Alex Jones was right all along lmao[/url][/quote]
[img]http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/40/768x384/gallery-1475607949-alex4.jpg[/img]
when was this beefcake ever wrong?[/quote]
Posting from a FEMA camp rn!
[img]http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/40/768x384/gallery-1475607949-alex4.jpg[/img]
when was this beefcake ever wrong?[/quote]
Posting from a FEMA camp rn!
fahrenheitPankeymanAlex Jones was right all along lmaoShow Content
Show Content
[quote=fahrenheit][quote=Pankeyman][url=https://youtu.be/gSlN87bhYzU]Alex Jones was right all along lmao[/url][/quote]
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIl_BNIJcFg[/spoiler][/quote]
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GInZ4oQhhzE[/spoiler]
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIl_BNIJcFg[/spoiler][/quote]
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GInZ4oQhhzE[/spoiler]
CollaideNub_Danish you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelingsThanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:CollaideAgain, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.Nub_Danish you stated your feelingsLibtards and their fee-fees right xD
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.
You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit. For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility. So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.
[quote=Collaide][quote=Nub_Danish] you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings[/quote]
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
[quote=Collaide]Again, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.[/quote]
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you stated your feelings[/quote]
Libtards and their fee-fees right [b]xD[/b]
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.[/quote]
You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit. For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility. So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
[quote=Collaide]Again, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.[/quote]
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you stated your feelings[/quote]
Libtards and their fee-fees right [b]xD[/b]
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.[/quote]
You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit. For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility. So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.
eeeSearchlightSince we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.no, 538's biggest "flaw" rn is not factoring in early voting or GOTV efforts, both of which seem to be helping Clinton
Having followed the 538 Elections Podcast, I think they make pretty good arguments for the model showing Trump with such a high chance of winning compared to other models. They don't factor in early voting because the people who vote early are already considered in the likely voter camp. These are the people that have been decided and would always show up as they do in polls. There's also the part about how early voting is a relatively new thing, and they don't know what early voting stats actually tell about how an election will turn out, so they're erring on the side of caution, which is what Nate Silver prides his model on.
With some states opening up to the possibility of flipping sides late, and some polls showing Clinton relatively down from being in the news lately (and Trump not doing anything retarded in the past two weeks), it's just a conservative (in the other way) guess that maybe Trump has a bigger possibility of winning than other models predict.
That said, they also address that they don't have the best numbers they can get. That kind of data is available to the pollsters at the DNC and RNC. The RNC historically has skewed their numbers in favor of themselves, but the DNC keeps rather accurate numbers. If the DNC thinks they're doing fine, they're probably doing fine and Clinton will actually win.
Show Content
Nate save me. You're the only one I trust in these trying times
[quote=eee][quote=Searchlight]Since we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.[/quote]
no, 538's biggest "flaw" rn is not factoring in early voting or GOTV efforts, both of which seem to be helping Clinton[/quote]
Having followed the 538 Elections Podcast, I think they make pretty good arguments for the model showing Trump with such a high chance of winning compared to other models. They don't factor in early voting because the people who vote early are already considered in the likely voter camp. These are the people that have been decided and would always show up as they do in polls. There's also the part about how early voting is a relatively new thing, and they don't know what early voting stats actually tell about how an election will turn out, so they're erring on the side of caution, which is what Nate Silver prides his model on.
With some states opening up to the possibility of flipping sides late, and some polls showing Clinton relatively down from being in the news lately (and Trump not doing anything retarded in the past two weeks), it's just a conservative (in the other way) guess that maybe Trump has a bigger possibility of winning than other models predict.
That said, they also address that they don't have the best numbers they can get. That kind of data is available to the pollsters at the DNC and RNC. The RNC historically has skewed their numbers in favor of themselves, but the DNC keeps rather accurate numbers. If the DNC thinks they're doing fine, they're probably doing fine and Clinton will actually win.
[spoiler]Nate save me. You're the only one I trust in these trying times[/spoiler]
no, 538's biggest "flaw" rn is not factoring in early voting or GOTV efforts, both of which seem to be helping Clinton[/quote]
Having followed the 538 Elections Podcast, I think they make pretty good arguments for the model showing Trump with such a high chance of winning compared to other models. They don't factor in early voting because the people who vote early are already considered in the likely voter camp. These are the people that have been decided and would always show up as they do in polls. There's also the part about how early voting is a relatively new thing, and they don't know what early voting stats actually tell about how an election will turn out, so they're erring on the side of caution, which is what Nate Silver prides his model on.
With some states opening up to the possibility of flipping sides late, and some polls showing Clinton relatively down from being in the news lately (and Trump not doing anything retarded in the past two weeks), it's just a conservative (in the other way) guess that maybe Trump has a bigger possibility of winning than other models predict.
That said, they also address that they don't have the best numbers they can get. That kind of data is available to the pollsters at the DNC and RNC. The RNC historically has skewed their numbers in favor of themselves, but the DNC keeps rather accurate numbers. If the DNC thinks they're doing fine, they're probably doing fine and Clinton will actually win.
[spoiler]Nate save me. You're the only one I trust in these trying times[/spoiler]
Nub_DanishCollaideYou do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit. For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.Nub_Danish you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelingsThanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:CollaideAgain, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.Nub_Danish you stated your feelingsLibtards and their fee-fees right xD
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.
I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility. So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.
Mate lol
I've lived in NJ all my life. I've heard stories of him being greedy since like 2000
[quote=Nub_Danish][quote=Collaide][quote=Nub_Danish] you called him greedy, you didn't tackle any points you stated your feelings[/quote]
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
[quote=Collaide]Again, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.[/quote]
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you stated your feelings[/quote]
Libtards and their fee-fees right [b]xD[/b]
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.[/quote]
You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit. For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility. So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.[/quote]
Mate lol
I've lived in NJ all my life. I've heard stories of him being greedy since like 2000
Thanks for answering my question for me. Since you clearly can't read, I will post what I said here instead.
Post 904:
[quote=Collaide]Again, I'm not oblivious to it, what I am saying is that Trump is exploiting the broken system instead of proving himself to be principled.[/quote]
Also stop putting yourself on a high horse.
[quote=Nub_Danish] you stated your feelings[/quote]
Libtards and their fee-fees right [b]xD[/b]
1. No, calling someone who isn't principled who does shit only for personal gain greedy is not a feeling
2. Believing in the notion that you yourself is the one true objective point of view is dangerous. If I could read your mind I would find a million things you believe merely because of feelings - that doesn't prove them right or wrong.[/quote]
You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit. For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility. So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.[/quote]
Mate lol
I've lived in NJ all my life. I've heard stories of him being greedy since like 2000
Nub_Danish You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit.
What else would he get by earning more money than he would have otherwise? More money to donate to charity? (which he doesn't do btw) yeah right.
My favourite presidential candidate is doing everything he can to earn more money, but the money he earns is not going to him nono.
Nub_Danish For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
He exploited mexican labour. That's not giving someone higher wages. How fucking retarded are you?
Nub_Danish I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility.
That sounds like a feeling.
Nub_DanishSo calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.
I'm gonna refute you with your own ramblings, perhaps you'll see how stupid they are ! :D
Calling him patriotic is a feeling my dude, you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him you would know he doesn't care about working people and that he is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility that he does a lot of what he does for personal gain.
Nub_DanishSo calling him greedy is a feeling my dude
No! :D Read my previous post again.
Nub_Danishyou don't know why he does what he does
I know what is more plausible. You on the other hand seem to think he gives all his money to charity and he's a fucking angel. [How did you find out that btw?:)] Nobody is like that. He doesn't give two shits about anyone, that's why he has a shady record.
Nub_Danishand if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic
Patriot =/= good president
Patriot =/= good guy
Patriot =/= competent
Patriot =x=> not greedy
Nub_Danishand feels the current government is incompetent
Yeah. The US government is incompetent, not bought by yuge corporations.
Nub_Danishso there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.
If anyone is willing to vote for anyone because there is a posibility that behind all his(trumps) shady and borderline illegal activities lies some good, that might almost balance it out, and that the good he in that case has done will some way make him qualified to lead a nation... is beyond irrational.
The same argument can be made for Hillary.
Well... there's a posibility that she has done good sometime for someone therefore if she's president maybe she will do more good ! :D
Your position is irrational, naive and clearly clouded with bias. You know you're wrong but can't admit it.
[quote=Nub_Danish] You do not know he is only doing it for personal benefit.[/quote]
What else would he get by earning more money than he would have otherwise? More money to donate to charity? (which he doesn't do btw) yeah right.
[u][i]My favourite presidential candidate is doing everything he can to earn more money, but the money he earns is not going to him nono.[/i][/u]
[quote=Nub_Danish] For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc. [/quote] He exploited mexican labour. That's not giving someone higher wages. How fucking retarded are you?
[quote=Nub_Danish] I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility.[/quote] That sounds like a feeling.
[quote=Nub_Danish]So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.[/quote]
I'm gonna refute you with your own ramblings, perhaps you'll see how stupid they are ! :D
[i]Calling him patriotic is a feeling my dude, you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him you would know he doesn't care about working people and that he is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility that he does a lot of what he does for personal gain.[/i]
[quote=Nub_Danish]So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude [/quote]
No! :D Read my previous post again.
[quote=Nub_Danish]you don't know why he does what he does[/quote]
I know what is more plausible. [i]You on the other hand seem to think he gives all his money to charity and he's a fucking angel.[/i] [How did you find out that btw?:)] Nobody is like that. He doesn't give two shits about anyone, that's why he has a shady record.
[quote=Nub_Danish]and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic [/quote]
Patriot =/= good president
Patriot =/= good guy
Patriot =/= competent
Patriot =x=> not greedy
[quote=Nub_Danish]and feels the current government is incompetent[/quote]
Yeah. The US government is [b]incompetent[/b], not [b]bought[/b] by [u]yuge[/u] corporations.
[quote=Nub_Danish]so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.[/quote]
If anyone is willing to vote for anyone because there is a posibility that behind all his(trumps) shady and borderline illegal activities lies some good, that might almost balance it out, and that the good he in that case has done will some way make him qualified to lead a nation... is beyond irrational.
The same argument can be made for Hillary.
[i]
Well... there's a posibility that she has done good sometime for someone therefore if she's president maybe she will do more good ! :D [/i]
Your position is irrational, naive and clearly clouded with bias. You know you're wrong but can't admit it.
What else would he get by earning more money than he would have otherwise? More money to donate to charity? (which he doesn't do btw) yeah right.
[u][i]My favourite presidential candidate is doing everything he can to earn more money, but the money he earns is not going to him nono.[/i][/u]
[quote=Nub_Danish] For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes. Not because fuck the people who my taxes support I hate them and only care about myself, but because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc. [/quote] He exploited mexican labour. That's not giving someone higher wages. How fucking retarded are you?
[quote=Nub_Danish] I'm not saying that trump avoids taxes and manufactures in china so that he can pay his american employees more or so he can give the american people a cheaper or better product, all I'm saying is it's a possibility.[/quote] That sounds like a feeling.
[quote=Nub_Danish]So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic and feels the current government is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.[/quote]
I'm gonna refute you with your own ramblings, perhaps you'll see how stupid they are ! :D
[i]Calling him patriotic is a feeling my dude, you don't know why he does what he does, and if you've listened to him you would know he doesn't care about working people and that he is incompetent so there certainly is the possibility that he does a lot of what he does for personal gain.[/i]
[quote=Nub_Danish]So calling him greedy is a feeling my dude [/quote]
No! :D Read my previous post again.
[quote=Nub_Danish]you don't know why he does what he does[/quote]
I know what is more plausible. [i]You on the other hand seem to think he gives all his money to charity and he's a fucking angel.[/i] [How did you find out that btw?:)] Nobody is like that. He doesn't give two shits about anyone, that's why he has a shady record.
[quote=Nub_Danish]and if you've listened to him talk you would know hes pretty patriotic [/quote]
Patriot =/= good president
Patriot =/= good guy
Patriot =/= competent
Patriot =x=> not greedy
[quote=Nub_Danish]and feels the current government is incompetent[/quote]
Yeah. The US government is [b]incompetent[/b], not [b]bought[/b] by [u]yuge[/u] corporations.
[quote=Nub_Danish]so there certainly is the possibility he does a lot of what he does to help others.[/quote]
If anyone is willing to vote for anyone because there is a posibility that behind all his(trumps) shady and borderline illegal activities lies some good, that might almost balance it out, and that the good he in that case has done will some way make him qualified to lead a nation... is beyond irrational.
The same argument can be made for Hillary.
[i]
Well... there's a posibility that she has done good sometime for someone therefore if she's president maybe she will do more good ! :D [/i]
Your position is irrational, naive and clearly clouded with bias. You know you're wrong but can't admit it.
Yes because people who avoid income taxes do so for the good of society.....
Yes because people who avoid income taxes do so for the good of society.....
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/
wow what a shocker
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/
wow what a shocker
wow what a shocker
i feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing
i feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing
eeei feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
Let us not forget though Hillary is STILL under FBI investigation for pay to play via the Clinton foundation. Comey has ties to the foundation however, which might be why he is letting her off easy on her emails. The IRS is also investigating the foundation as there have been multiple tax violations and unreported gifts in the millions.
[quote=eee]i feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing[/quote]
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
Let us not forget though [b]Hillary is STILL under FBI investigation[/b] for pay to play via the Clinton foundation. Comey has ties to the foundation however, which might be why he is letting her off easy on her emails. The IRS is also investigating the foundation as there have been multiple tax violations and unreported gifts in the millions.
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
Let us not forget though [b]Hillary is STILL under FBI investigation[/b] for pay to play via the Clinton foundation. Comey has ties to the foundation however, which might be why he is letting her off easy on her emails. The IRS is also investigating the foundation as there have been multiple tax violations and unreported gifts in the millions.
College speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58
College speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58
Nub_DanishFor example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes... because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc.
Put down the Ayn Rand novel and back slowly away. We have people that can help you, but first you have to admit that you have a problem.
[quote=Nub_Danish]For example if a person believed the government was corrupt, greedy or incompetent they would certainly avoid taxes... because they believe themselves to be able to do more good with the money i.e pay workers higher wages, give more benefits etc. [/quote]
Put down the Ayn Rand novel and back slowly away. We have people that can help you, but first you have to admit that you have a problem.
Put down the Ayn Rand novel and back slowly away. We have people that can help you, but first you have to admit that you have a problem.
dollarlayereeei feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=eee]i feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing[/quote]
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
[/quote]
https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/795435387321655296
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
[/quote]
https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/795435387321655296
dollarlayereeei feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
Let us not forget though Hillary is STILL under FBI investigation for pay to play via the Clinton foundation. Comey has ties to the foundation however, which might be why he is letting her off easy on her emails. The IRS is also investigating the foundation as there have been multiple tax violations and unreported gifts in the millions.
idk how you understand computers well enough to use this site but don't understand how they sorted the emails
first they didn't have 650,000 emails, the computer did. They could only look at ones from Clinton because of the way warrants work
second, most of the emails were duplicates they already had sorted
third, reading an email doesn't take very long and considering the FBI was hellbent on finding something they'dve been dumping serious manpower into the case
fourth, they didn't only have 8 days. They've had the laptop for several weeks. The only way they would've had 8 days would've been if they'd waited for the warrant to start planning their search and organization of the emails. They had 8 days to read a few hundred new emails at most because the back end to sort everything was prepared ahead of time
and feel free to find an FBI statement saying the clinton foundation is under investigation
(you won't because they aren't)
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=eee]i feel bad for comey cause he seems like he just wants to hold everything together but the rest of the FBI is trying to do its own thing[/quote]
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
Let us not forget though [b]Hillary is STILL under FBI investigation[/b] for pay to play via the Clinton foundation. Comey has ties to the foundation however, which might be why he is letting her off easy on her emails. The IRS is also investigating the foundation as there have been multiple tax violations and unreported gifts in the millions.[/quote]
idk how you understand computers well enough to use this site but don't understand how they sorted the emails
first they didn't have 650,000 emails, the computer did. They could only look at ones from Clinton because of the way warrants work
second, most of the emails were duplicates they already had sorted
third, reading an email doesn't take very long and considering the FBI was hellbent on finding something they'dve been dumping serious manpower into the case
fourth, they didn't only have 8 days. They've had the laptop for several weeks. The only way they would've had 8 days would've been if they'd waited for the warrant to start planning their search and organization of the emails. They had 8 days to read a few hundred new emails at most because the back end to sort everything was prepared ahead of time
and feel free to find an FBI statement saying the clinton foundation is under investigation
(you won't because they aren't)
I don't feel bad for him at all. First investigation takes over a year to look through 50,000 emails.
Second investigation takes 8 days to look through 650,000 emails. That is roughly 1 email per second. Yes I know they used software and stuff to do some of the work for them but still, bullshit. Hopefully congress will hold a hearing (several senators are calling for this). They want to question Comey.
Let us not forget though [b]Hillary is STILL under FBI investigation[/b] for pay to play via the Clinton foundation. Comey has ties to the foundation however, which might be why he is letting her off easy on her emails. The IRS is also investigating the foundation as there have been multiple tax violations and unreported gifts in the millions.[/quote]
idk how you understand computers well enough to use this site but don't understand how they sorted the emails
first they didn't have 650,000 emails, the computer did. They could only look at ones from Clinton because of the way warrants work
second, most of the emails were duplicates they already had sorted
third, reading an email doesn't take very long and considering the FBI was hellbent on finding something they'dve been dumping serious manpower into the case
fourth, they didn't only have 8 days. They've had the laptop for several weeks. The only way they would've had 8 days would've been if they'd waited for the warrant to start planning their search and organization of the emails. They had 8 days to read a few hundred new emails at most because the back end to sort everything was prepared ahead of time
and feel free to find an FBI statement saying the clinton foundation is under investigation
(you won't because they aren't)
538 has last minute polling leaning further in Clinton's direction, but not back to mid October levels. A lot of states are still on the edge. Could be the result of the email "clearing" although I'm not sure how many polls would have been after that, but floating voters could easily have been waiting on that decision.
There's apparently a 10% chance of a recount somewhere so a realistic chance there'll be an opportunity for one side or other to complain or drag out the result. That's probably true of any election, but it's been a prominent theme in this one so it's of particular significance.
Unfortunately odds on a meteorite strike don't seem to be high enough to register so many people's preferred outcome isn't accounted for.
538 has last minute polling leaning further in Clinton's direction, but not back to mid October levels. A lot of states are still on the edge. Could be the result of the email "clearing" although I'm not sure how many polls would have been after that, but floating voters could easily have been waiting on that decision.
There's apparently a 10% chance of a recount somewhere so a realistic chance there'll be an opportunity for one side or other to complain or drag out the result. That's probably true of any election, but it's been a prominent theme in this one so it's of particular significance.
Unfortunately odds on a meteorite strike don't seem to be high enough to register so many people's preferred outcome isn't accounted for.
There's apparently a 10% chance of a recount somewhere so a realistic chance there'll be an opportunity for one side or other to complain or drag out the result. That's probably true of any election, but it's been a prominent theme in this one so it's of particular significance.
Unfortunately odds on a meteorite strike don't seem to be high enough to register so many people's preferred outcome isn't accounted for.
guys I found some exclusive footage of $layer calling out true government corruption!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRNSKN3eE8c
guys I found some exclusive footage of $layer calling out true government corruption!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRNSKN3eE8c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRNSKN3eE8c
Trump might be looking to appoint his campaign finance manager, Steven Mnuchin, as Treasury secretary. Despite Steven Mnuchin being ex-Goldman Sachs who wants to "look at" Dodd-Frank while Trump also has said Dodd-Frank should be repealed.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/steven-mnuchin-treasury-donald-trump-230716
Don't worry though. Trump will still continue to be staunchly anti-establishment like he's totally been all campaign.
Trump might be looking to appoint his campaign finance manager, Steven Mnuchin, as Treasury secretary. Despite Steven Mnuchin being ex-Goldman Sachs who wants to "look at" Dodd-Frank while Trump also has said Dodd-Frank should be repealed.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/steven-mnuchin-treasury-donald-trump-230716
Don't worry though. Trump will still continue to be staunchly anti-establishment like he's [i]totally[/i] been all campaign.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/steven-mnuchin-treasury-donald-trump-230716
Don't worry though. Trump will still continue to be staunchly anti-establishment like he's [i]totally[/i] been all campaign.
pls Avasterino get off ur ivory tower and stop using big words like "Dodd", the people know who the REAL corrupt candidate is #$hillary #spiritcooking
pls Avasterino get off ur ivory tower and stop using big words like "Dodd", the people know who the REAL corrupt candidate is #$hillary #spiritcooking
mustardoverlordpls Avasterino get off ur ivory tower and stop using big words like "Dodd", the people know who the REAL corrupt candidate is #$hillary #spiritcooking
trump would never use 8.2 million in campaign donations to fund his own businesses or buy 50k worth of his own books at retail price, he would also never (allegedly) bribe state attorney generals into dropping the Trump University case... he's an angel.....
[quote=mustardoverlord]pls Avasterino get off ur ivory tower and stop using big words like "Dodd", the people know who the REAL corrupt candidate is #$hillary #spiritcooking[/quote]
trump would never use 8.2 million in campaign donations to fund his own businesses or buy 50k worth of his own books at retail price, he would also never (allegedly) bribe state attorney generals into dropping the Trump University case... he's an angel.....
trump would never use 8.2 million in campaign donations to fund his own businesses or buy 50k worth of his own books at retail price, he would also never (allegedly) bribe state attorney generals into dropping the Trump University case... he's an angel.....
dollarlayerCollege speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things
[quote=dollarlayer]College speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58[/quote]
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58[/quote]
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things
CleepopledollarlayerCollege speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things
yeah but they were black
[quote=Cleepople][quote=dollarlayer]College speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58[/quote]
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things[/quote]
yeah but they were black
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58[/quote]
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things[/quote]
yeah but they were black
remedyCleepopleyeah but they were blackdollarlayerCollege speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things
not all of them...there were plenty of protesters of other genders and ethnicities. Also apparently some people haven't heard of peaceful protesting or non-obnoxious gestures, but I'm not going to dwindle on it too much since much of any expansion on it ends up like a 3rd grade tattletale fiasco.
however my opinion on this little bit at least is that it's incredibly odd that there's only protesters at trump rallies and not Clinton's...I'm not exactly buying into what some people are saying that the Clintons are paying people to protest trump rallies to make him look bad, but something just doesn't feel right about it...
I don't really like talking about politics because after a talk with anyone of an opposing view, I feel like it further shows how divided as a country we've become. It's disgusting, but it's reality.
[quote=remedy][quote=Cleepople][quote=dollarlayer]College speaker calls out Hillary Clinton at her own rally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58[/quote]
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things[/quote]
yeah but they were black[/quote]
not all of them...there were plenty of protesters of other genders and ethnicities. Also apparently some people haven't heard of peaceful protesting or non-obnoxious gestures, but I'm not going to dwindle on it too much since much of any expansion on it ends up like a 3rd grade tattletale fiasco.
however my opinion on this little bit at least is that it's incredibly odd that there's only protesters at trump rallies and not Clinton's...I'm not exactly buying into what some people are saying that the Clintons are paying people to protest trump rallies to make him look bad, but something just doesn't feel right about it...
I don't really like talking about politics because after a talk with anyone of an opposing view, I feel like it further shows how divided as a country we've become. It's disgusting, but it's reality.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9bmc1uKAz4&feature=youtu.be&t=58[/quote]
People have protested at Trump rallies and have been subject to physical abuse among other things[/quote]
yeah but they were black[/quote]
not all of them...there were plenty of protesters of other genders and ethnicities. Also apparently some people haven't heard of peaceful protesting or non-obnoxious gestures, but I'm not going to dwindle on it too much since much of any expansion on it ends up like a 3rd grade tattletale fiasco.
however my opinion on this little bit at least is that it's incredibly odd that there's only protesters at trump rallies and not Clinton's...I'm not exactly buying into what some people are saying that the Clintons are paying people to protest trump rallies to make him look bad, but something just doesn't feel right about it...
I don't really like talking about politics because after a talk with anyone of an opposing view, I feel like it further shows how divided as a country we've become. It's disgusting, but it's reality.
This thread has been locked.