The TF2 Riddle

#1

the301stspartan

0 Frags – +

http://i.imgur.com/Kwy1k7S.jpg

Can you solve it?

[img]http://i.imgur.com/Kwy1k7S.jpg[/img]
Can you solve it?

#2

zeFrosty

58 Frags – +

i know b4nny = 3rd but past that I have no idea...

#3

Rikachu

17 Frags – +

Right click image and Search Google for image

#4

Reero

31 Frags – +

b4nny = 154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999
Sideshow =36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579
Tyrone = 4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036

#5

catman1900

29 Frags – +

RikachuRight click image and Search Google for image

Show Content

http://prntscr.com/fkyqe9

[quote=Rikachu]Right click image and Search Google for image[/quote]

[spoiler]http://prntscr.com/fkyqe9[/spoiler]

#6

All_Over_RS

3 Frags – +

i dont know how to do math :(

#7

vita

-2 Frags – +

sideshow = 01100100011100100110100101100010011000100110110001100101

#8

RRP

11 Frags – +

https://a.pomf.cat/cbllkh.PNG

[img]https://a.pomf.cat/cbllkh.PNG[/img]

#9

Reero

0 Frags – +

RRPhttps://a.pomf.cat/cbllkh.PNG

can pro computation time brute force 80 digit integers?

[quote=RRP][img]https://a.pomf.cat/cbllkh.PNG[/img][/quote]

can pro computation time brute force 80 digit integers?

#10

kameltin

-1 Frags – +

4
7

#11

Stevie

4 Frags – +

is this suppose to be like a parametric equation?

#12

joshuawn

13 Frags – +

if you're interested in this (or really any other kind of) sequence, you should consult the online encyclopedia of integer sequences:
https://oeis.org/A283564

a general analysis of the sequence can be found in the linked original paper by Andrew Bremner and Allan Macleod. the solutions themselves, such as the one reero posted for n = 4, can be found in the mathoverflow link. Allan, one of the aforementioned authors, also chimed in.

this sequence is analytically tackled through algebraic topology & specific solutions can be found by plugging a generator into a Computer Algebra System.

if you're interested in this (or really any other kind of) sequence, you should consult the online encyclopedia of integer sequences:
https://oeis.org/A283564

a general analysis of the sequence can be found in the linked original paper by Andrew Bremner and Allan Macleod. the solutions themselves, such as the one reero posted for n = 4, can be found in the mathoverflow link. Allan, one of the aforementioned authors, also chimed in.

this sequence is analytically tackled through algebraic topology & specific solutions can be found by plugging a generator into a Computer Algebra System.

#13

the301stspartan

3 Frags – +

joshuawnif you're interested in this (or really any other kind of) sequence, you should consult the online encyclopedia of integer sequences:
https://oeis.org/A283564

There are no solutions there

[quote=joshuawn]if you're interested in this (or really any other kind of) sequence, you should consult the online encyclopedia of integer sequences:
https://oeis.org/A283564[/quote]

There are no solutions there

#14

joshuawn

5 Frags – +

the301stspartanjoshuawnif you're interested in this (or really any other kind of) sequence, you should consult the online encyclopedia of integer sequences:
https://oeis.org/A283564
There are no solutions there

i was editing my post to go more in-depth about where to look. :)
the comments section in the provided mathoverflow link describe the steps to generating your desired solutions.

[quote=the301stspartan][quote=joshuawn]if you're interested in this (or really any other kind of) sequence, you should consult the online encyclopedia of integer sequences:
https://oeis.org/A283564[/quote]

There are no solutions there[/quote]

i was editing my post to go more in-depth about where to look. :)
the comments section in the provided mathoverflow link describe the steps to generating your desired solutions.

#15

4hp

14 Frags – +

joshuawnstuff

ugh I'm glad that the solution for this isn't simple, because I spent like half an hour trying to do it and was ready to declare all my maths classes a waste.

[quote=joshuawn]stuff[/quote]

ugh I'm glad that the solution for this isn't simple, because I spent like half an hour trying to do it and was ready to declare all my maths classes a waste.

#16

HobNobs

1 Frags – +

RikachuRight click image and Search Google for image

https://i.gyazo.com/bec90b912c21debbef1e450347a730cf.png

...

[quote=Rikachu]Right click image and Search Google for image[/quote]

[img]https://i.gyazo.com/bec90b912c21debbef1e450347a730cf.png[/img]

...

#17

ether_

6 Frags – +

if it didn't specify that they had to be positive integers, you don't get integers nearly as large: (11,9,-5) and (11,4,-1) are two examples

getting the answers are still difficult but it's cool how just by specifying that the ans has to be positive you get much bigger numbers

if it didn't specify that they had to be positive integers, you don't get integers nearly as large: (11,9,-5) and (11,4,-1) are two examples

getting the answers are still difficult but it's cool how just by specifying that the ans has to be positive you get much bigger numbers