Ppl may give him shit as a leader but he's not a bad player by any means. Definitely give him a tryout

Very dedicated and a nice guy, but I think mid-high open would be more appropriate than mid IM

Nice guy. He takes his teams seriously and is always been consistent in my experiences on the management side of things. In my opinion, getting him away from his team and previous rosters will be a good opportunity to prove himself as a standalone player. This is what he needs to do to progress, and I think if he takes the opportunity he will progress well. On the other hand, I know fun it is to lead a team and play on it with your friends, so I don't blame him if not. Give him a shot if he decides to take this route. Personally, I have not had a bad experience with this guy.

LMFAOOOOOOOO

7:38 PM - della: i look up to him
7:39 PM - della: he’s my dad

brony

how are you going to say mid im when you have gone 6-10 for the past 2 seasons

consistently bad but talks like hes good

why do people still use OpIM

also

good LORD you were in open, OPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMAO like everyone else who was in the div when IM died. jesus christ that bothers me more than it should that people keep saying that

mid or high open

good pickup for mid open

perhaps try playing toontown or neopets before trying to play IM

christ now we have mid open players thinking they belong in IM

hopefully you’re the last

"now we"
I think you mean
"we always"

yo dont shit talk toontown. that game requires at least a high im skill level to play

Hey nazara, thanks for the reply!

I'm glad you brought this up, this is a concept a lot of players seem to struggle with. You see, believe it or not there's actually a difference between the team leader and the individual players on his team. If you take this into account and then use a useful tool called "nuance", it becomes easy to understand how this kind of thing can happen. In this case, you can utilize "nuance" by going past the ESEA team front page and clicking on the "Roster History" tab, then comparing the roster changes with match performance. If you wanted to do more than due diligence, you could even cross-reference roster changes with scrim performance by using logs.tf!

I hope you found this information helpful :)

wow you sound like a fag

Very chill, solid leader. Dedicated to improving and isn't toxic.

there's a right way and a wrong way to post in your own lft, trust me, i know

this is the wrong way

the right way does not involve being a condescending douchebag

you had Affliction on your roster. that man graces you with his presence and this is what you do smh

Take it from me, it's a lot more fun to be condescending when you actually have even the slightest idea what you're talking about

From someone who's player on multiple teams with him

In short, really nice and fun dude out of game, but needs to work on decision making, being more open-minded, and being realistic about his own skill level.

Tends to blame clear positional mistakes on baiting but may cease when a different team leader other than himself sets him straight.

Good mid-high open pick as he won't tilt/emo out, will be reliable and hard-working, and has enough dm at that level to hold his own.

Skill level is nowhere near high open let alone mid im from what I could tell when we scrimmed him once.

muddy, maybe if you wanted to go mid open you wouldn't start fresh with a totally new roster every season

rant incoming: on top of starting fresh rosters every season resulting in his lack of success, I don't think he's very open minded about about map reviews and stuff like that. I remember changing so much stuff in his Snakewater powerpoint when i tried out for their team before s26 and he was very prompt to dismiss what i had to say, and how i could improve their holds, in that snakewater scrim they rang Slicerogue on demo and he did quite well, but when i played the 10:30 with them he shit talked slicerogue and blamed him for them losing like 5-3 or something, even though a) he was not at all comfortable playing demo and b) despite point a) was actually a better demo than the rest of the tryouts were at their classes, as well as better than muddy on pocket.

overall: if you're like mid open (2 div) then i'd suggest picking him up because he's hella dedicated and wants to learn, but at the same time I dont think he's currently open minded enough to actually search for and use any advice that he is given.

=^._.^= ∫

I'll admit I indulged waaaaay too much in that post. Snark aside though, my advice was genuine and my point was salient; the performance or skill of any other individual on a given team should not necessarily be conflated with the performance or general skill of the rest of the team as a whole, and players should perhaps do a little legwork before posting something based on, for instance, hearsay or a single scrim against an old lineup. I guess I can't speak for anyone else, but I would certainly never shitpost on someone else's LFT thread with a comment that lacked any recent, relevant, or accurate information.

and you’re hopeless

(2 year banny sub badge) ($100 bit donation badge) progradeTF2: b4nny is so good LUL

Hey nazara, thanks for the reply!

I'm glad you brought this up, this is a concept a lot of players seem to struggle with. You see, believe it or not there's actually a difference between the team leader and the individual players on his team. If you take this into account and then use a useful tool called "nuance", it becomes easy to understand how this kind of thing can happen. In this case, you can utilize "nuance" by going past the ESEA team front page and clicking on the "Roster History" tab, then comparing the roster changes with match performance. If you wanted to do more than due diligence, you could even cross-reference roster changes with scrim performance by using logs.tf!

I hope you found this information helpful :)