Lmfao just how communist is this site? I knew it was left wing, but damn
Doom1Lmfao just how communist is this site? I knew it was left wing, but damn
You don’t have to be communist to understand basic chemistry and physics.
You don’t have to be communist to understand basic chemistry and physics.
https://i.imgur.com/fCCsQ3h.gif
Doom1Lmfao just how communist is this site? I knew it was left wing, but damn
Does caring about the environment make you a communist?
im a communist btw
[quote=Doom1]Lmfao just how communist is this site? I knew it was left wing, but damn[/quote]
Does caring about the environment make you a communist?
im a communist btw
☭ I have never killed any one, but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction ☭
I wish being communist made you care about the environment so China would be a lot more epic
Doom1Lmfao just how communist is this site? I knew it was left wing, but damn
THE DIALECTICS ARE IN MOTION
THE DIALECTICS ARE IN MOTION
⠀⠀⣀⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⣶⣶⣿⠿⠛⣶
⠤⣀⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⣿⣤
⠒⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠉⣀
⠀⠤⣤⣤⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⣿
⠀⠀⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⣶⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿⣿⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣉⣿⣿⠿⠀⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠛⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠛⠛
⠀⠀⠀⣀⣶⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠒⣛⣭
⠀⠀⠀⣀⠿⣿⣶
⠀⣤⣿⠤⣭⣿⣿
⣤⣿⣿⣿⠛⣿⣿⠀⣀
⠀⣀⠤⣿⣿⣶⣤⣒⣛
⠉⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⠉
⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿⠿⠿⣿
⠀⣶⣿⣿⠛⠀⣿⣿
⣤⣿⣿⠉⠤⣿⣿⠿
⣿⣿⠛⠀⠿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣤⠀⣿⣿⠿
⠀⣿⣿⣶⠀⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠛⣿⠀⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣉⣿⠀⣿⣿
⠀⠶⣶⠿⠛⠀⠉⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⠶⠀⠀⣀⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣀⣶⣤⣤⠿⠶⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣉⣿⣿
⠿⣉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣤⣿⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣛⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⠿⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⠿⣿⠀⠀⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠛⠀⠀⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⠤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿
⠀⠀⣀
⠀⠿⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠉⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠛⣿⣭⣀⣀⣤
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠿⣶⣀
⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣉⣶
⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⣿⠉
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⣿⣿⣿⠿⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⣿⣿⠿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣶⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠛⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣀
⠀⣿⣿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠉⠛⠛⠿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿
⠀⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉
⣀⣶⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣤⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣤⣶⣶⠶⠛⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠛⣿⣤⣤⣀⣤⠿⠉⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣛⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣶⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠿⣶⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣤⣶⣀⠿⠶⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠉⠿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⠿⠉⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠤⣿⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀
⠀⠀⣶⣿⠿⠀⠀⠀⣀⠀⣤⣤
⠀⣶⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛⠛⠿⣤⣀
⣶⣿⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣿⣿⣿⣀⣤⣶⣭⣿⣶⣀
⠉⠉⠉⠛⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠛⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⠛⠿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠛⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⠀⠀⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⣤⣤⣤⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣿⣉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣉⠉⣿⣶
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿
⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠀⣿⣶
⣤⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣤
⠉⠉⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠒⠛⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠉⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣤⠀⠛⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀⣶⣿⣿⠶
⣶⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣤
⠀⠉⠶⣶⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿⣤⣀
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠿⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⠀⠶⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠛⠛⠿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣉⠿⣿⠶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠒
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛⣭⣭⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣭⣤⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣭
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠉⠛⠿⣶⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⠀⠀⣶⣶⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣶⠀⠀⣀⣤⣶⣤⣉⣿⣿⣤⣀
⠤⣤⣿⣤⣿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠛⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠉⠛⠿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠀⠀⠀⣶⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⠀⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠉⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣛⣿⣭⣶⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠉⠛⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣉⠀⣶⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⣶⣶⣿⠿⠛⣶
⠤⣀⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⣿⣤
⠒⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠉⣀
⠀⠤⣤⣤⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⣿
⠀⠀⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⣶⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿⣿⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣉⣿⣿⠿⠀⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠛⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠛⠛
⠀⠀⠀⣀⣶⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠒⣛⣭
⠀⠀⠀⣀⠿⣿⣶
⠀⣤⣿⠤⣭⣿⣿
⣤⣿⣿⣿⠛⣿⣿⠀⣀
⠀⣀⠤⣿⣿⣶⣤⣒⣛
⠉⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⠉
⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿⠿⠿⣿
⠀⣶⣿⣿⠛⠀⣿⣿
⣤⣿⣿⠉⠤⣿⣿⠿
⣿⣿⠛⠀⠿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣤⠀⣿⣿⠿
⠀⣿⣿⣶⠀⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠛⣿⠀⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⣉⣿⠀⣿⣿
⠀⠶⣶⠿⠛⠀⠉⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⠶⠀⠀⣀⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣀⣶⣤⣤⠿⠶⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣉⣿⣿
⠿⣉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣤⣿⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣛⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⠿⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⠿⣿⠀⠀⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠛⠀⠀⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⠤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿
⠀⠀⣀
⠀⠿⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠉⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠛⣿⣭⣀⣀⣤
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠿⣶⣀
⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⣉⣶
⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⣿⠉
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⣿⣿⣿⠿⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⣿⣿⠿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣶⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠛⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣀
⠀⣿⣿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠉⠛⠛⠿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿
⠀⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉
⣀⣶⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣤⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣤⣶⣶⠶⠛⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠛⣿⣤⣤⣀⣤⠿⠉⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣛⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣶⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠿⣶⣤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣤⣶⣀⠿⠶⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠉⠿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⠿⠉⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣿⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠤⣿⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀
⠀⠀⣶⣿⠿⠀⠀⠀⣀⠀⣤⣤
⠀⣶⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛⠛⠿⣤⣀
⣶⣿⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣿⣿⣿⣀⣤⣶⣭⣿⣶⣀
⠉⠉⠉⠛⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠛⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⠛⠿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠛⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⠀⠀⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⣤⣤⣤⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣿⣉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣉⠉⣿⣶
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿
⠀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠀⣿⣶
⣤⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣤
⠉⠉⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠒⠛⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠉⠿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣤⠀⠛⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠀⠀⠀⣿⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣿⣿⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀⣶⣿⣿⠶
⣶⣿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣤
⠀⠉⠶⣶⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣿⣤⣀
⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠿⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⠀⠶⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠛⠛⠿⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣉⠿⣿⠶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠒
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠛⣭⣭⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣭⣤⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣭
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠉⠛⠿⣶⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⠀⠀⣶⣶⠿⠿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠛
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣶
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣤⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⣶⠀⠀⣀⣤⣶⣤⣉⣿⣿⣤⣀
⠤⣤⣿⣤⣿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀
⠀⠛⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠉⠛⠿⣿⣤
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠀⠀⠀⣶⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⠀⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠉⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠉
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣛⣿⣭⣶⣀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠉⠛⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⣿⣿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣉⠀⣶⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣶⣿⠿
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⠛
scrabSounds like this guy was pretty based
Ahjahaha so funny me likey
Ahjahaha so funny me likey
ValorousTFhttps://i.imgur.com/ao0RMaR.png
[img]https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/e5b6399f9f9c336e985b1bddc7f212d666b7db7a/c=0-199-6040-3612/local/-/media/2018/06/29/USATODAY/USATODAY/636658653327629122-GettyImages-467706864.jpg?width=3200&height=1680&fit=crop[/img]
SeinfeldValorousTFhttps://i.imgur.com/ao0RMaR.pnghttps://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/e5b6399f9f9c336e985b1bddc7f212d666b7db7a/c=0-199-6040-3612/local/-/media/2018/06/29/USATODAY/USATODAY/636658653327629122-GettyImages-467706864.jpg?width=3200&height=1680&fit=crop
no wonder the white guy is washing his hands after that handshake
[img]https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/e5b6399f9f9c336e985b1bddc7f212d666b7db7a/c=0-199-6040-3612/local/-/media/2018/06/29/USATODAY/USATODAY/636658653327629122-GettyImages-467706864.jpg?width=3200&height=1680&fit=crop[/img][/quote]
no wonder the white guy is washing his hands after that handshake
i cant believe there are people who actually like these jews
CollaideAhjahaha so funny me likey
I wasn't trying to be funny, sir. I read a little about him and it seems he just made a lot of money and used it to promote his personal beliefs, something that I'm sure you would do if you could afford lobbyists and think tanks. Given that there's still no empirical evidence that climate change is man made, it's not like he was some kook maliciously denying hard scientific facts or anything. So yeah, I'm thinking he's based.
I wasn't trying to be funny, sir. I read a little about him and it seems he just made a lot of money and used it to promote his personal beliefs, something that I'm sure you would do if you could afford lobbyists and think tanks. Given that there's still no empirical evidence that climate change is man made, it's not like he was some kook maliciously denying hard scientific facts or anything. So yeah, I'm thinking he's based.
scrabCollaideAhjahaha so funny me likey
I wasn't trying to be funny, sir. I read a little about him and it seems he just made a lot of money and used it to promote his personal beliefs, something that I'm sure you would do if you could afford lobbyists and think tanks. Given that there's still no empirical evidence that climate change is man made, it's not like he was some kook maliciously denying hard scientific facts or anything. So yeah, I'm thinking he's based.
Ahaha hilarious jokes my dude I like the part u said there's no evidence climate change is man made, that was really funny.
I wasn't trying to be funny, sir. I read a little about him and it seems he just made a lot of money and used it to promote his personal beliefs, something that I'm sure you would do if you could afford lobbyists and think tanks. Given that there's still no empirical evidence that climate change is man made, it's not like he was some kook maliciously denying hard scientific facts or anything. So yeah, I'm thinking he's based.[/quote]
Ahaha hilarious jokes my dude I like the part u said there's no evidence climate change is man made, that was really funny.
ValorousTFShow Content
They are literally funding people pushing the overton window to the right. I recall don't think right wingers mind that the Kochs fund them, politicians, think tanks, and media figures who basically agree with them on every issue. Idk, the American right is very far right. But what do I know?
They are literally funding people pushing the overton window to the right. I recall don't think right wingers mind that the Kochs fund them, politicians, think tanks, and media figures who basically agree with them on every issue. Idk, the American right is very far right. But what do I know?
CollaideValorousTFThey are literally funding people pushing the overton window to the right. I recall don't think right wingers mind that the Kochs fund them, politicians, think tanks, and media figures who basically agree with them on every issue. Idk, the American right is very far right. But what do I know?Show Content
whats wrong with being far right?
They are literally funding people pushing the overton window to the right. I recall don't think right wingers mind that the Kochs fund them, politicians, think tanks, and media figures who basically agree with them on every issue. Idk, the American right is very far right. But what do I know?[/quote]
whats wrong with being far right?
scrabGiven that there's still no empirical evidence that climate change is man made, it's not like he was some kook maliciously denying hard scientific facts or anything.
Man-made climate change isn't even just a hard scientific fact, it's trivially true. We know the amount that certain gasses contribute to a greenhouse effect -- this is an experiment you can do in your backyard with a little effort. We know the rough amount we've been pumping into the atmosphere, double-checked by measuring the composition of the atmosphere. Do some basic multiplication and you see that there is an increase in average temperature. And what do ya know, we've also noticed that exact same increase as our greenhouse gas levels increased.
What scientists don't always agree on are the runaway effects and the tipping points. How long on our current trajectory until phytoplankton dies en masse, releasing amounts of CO2 that we won't be able to deal with? Release of CO2 in the thawing permafrost? What about increase in heatwaves, droughts, and forest fires? How about when England becomes uninhabitable due to extremely humid heat?
It's important to note that those are all "if this model is correct, things are much worse than we thought." We already know for 100% fact that we are causing climate change and it is fucking things up -- the models just range from "this is a significant problem that will be painful to live with" to "most of the world will die."
Man-made climate change isn't even just a hard scientific fact, it's trivially true. We know the amount that certain gasses contribute to a greenhouse effect -- this is an experiment you can do in your backyard with a little effort. We know the rough amount we've been pumping into the atmosphere, double-checked by measuring the composition of the atmosphere. Do some basic multiplication and you see that there is an increase in average temperature. And what do ya know, we've also noticed that exact same increase as our greenhouse gas levels increased.
What scientists don't always agree on are the runaway effects and the tipping points. How long on our current trajectory until phytoplankton dies en masse, releasing amounts of CO2 that we won't be able to deal with? Release of CO2 in the thawing permafrost? What about increase in heatwaves, droughts, and forest fires? How about when England becomes uninhabitable due to extremely humid heat?
It's important to note that those are all "if this model is correct, things are much worse than we thought." We already know for 100% fact that we are causing climate change and it is fucking things up -- the models just range from "this is a significant problem that will be painful to live with" to "most of the world will die."
CollaideValorousTFThey are literally funding people pushing the overton window to the right. I recall don't think right wingers mind that the Kochs fund them, politicians, think tanks, and media figures who basically agree with them on every issue. Idk, the American right is very far right. But what do I know?Show Content
From the perspective of someone who is probably considered "far right" I can confidently tell you that the overton window has not pushed to the right at all. All the Koch brothers really did was bankroll the republican party into becoming an ugly breed of TP:USA libertarianism and boomer conservatism.
The authentic right absolutely despise and blame them a lot for the society we live in today. They pushed for the right for women to have an abortion, they pushed for opening up borders to immigration, they pushed for the legalisation of (some?) drugs and essentially pushed the overton window to the left by integrating these typically left wing ideas into the republican party.
The whole overarching idea is that the Koch brothers are mainly responsible for damaging the authenticity of the republican movement and making it much more left wing as a whole.
They are literally funding people pushing the overton window to the right. I recall don't think right wingers mind that the Kochs fund them, politicians, think tanks, and media figures who basically agree with them on every issue. Idk, the American right is very far right. But what do I know?[/quote]
From the perspective of someone who is probably considered "far right" I can confidently tell you that the overton window has not pushed to the right at all. All the Koch brothers really did was bankroll the republican party into becoming an ugly breed of TP:USA libertarianism and boomer conservatism.
The authentic right absolutely despise and blame them a lot for the society we live in today. They pushed for the right for women to have an abortion, they pushed for opening up borders to immigration, they pushed for the legalisation of (some?) drugs and essentially pushed the overton window to the left by integrating these typically left wing ideas into the republican party.
The whole overarching idea is that the Koch brothers are mainly responsible for damaging the authenticity of the republican movement and making it much more left wing as a whole.
CollaideAhaha hilarious jokes my dude I like the part u said there's no evidence climate change is man made, that was really funny.
Are you ok? Lol
JarateKingMan-made climate change isn't even just a hard scientific fact, it's trivially true. We know the amount that certain gasses contribute to a greenhouse effect -- this is an experiment you can do in your backyard with a little effort. We know the rough amount we've been pumping into the atmosphere, double-checked by measuring the composition of the atmosphere. Do some basic multiplication and you see that there is an increase in average temperature. And what do ya know, we've also noticed that exact same increase as our greenhouse gas levels increased.
Hmm when you put it like that it does seem very simple. You can't cite a single piece of research that backs up any of that though, because it doesn't exist.
Are you ok? Lol
[quote=JarateKing]Man-made climate change isn't even just a hard scientific fact, it's trivially true. We know the amount that certain gasses contribute to a greenhouse effect -- this is an experiment you can do in your backyard with a little effort. We know the rough amount we've been pumping into the atmosphere, double-checked by measuring the composition of the atmosphere. Do some basic multiplication and you see that there is an increase in average temperature. And what do ya know, we've also noticed that exact same increase as our greenhouse gas levels increased.[/quote]
Hmm when you put it like that it does seem very simple. You can't cite a single piece of research that backs up any of that though, because it doesn't exist.
scrabHmm when you put it like that it does seem very simple. You can't cite a single piece of research that backs up any of that though, because it doesn't exist.
We've known every step of that process since the 1800s. John Tyndall discovered the concept of greenhouse gases in 1859. Svante Arrhenius calculated the impact it would have if atmospheric CO2 was doubled in 1896 (though it didn't factor in everything because climate science wasn't mature at that point, but it got the jist and observed the core concept). To my knowledge, no credible papers since then have suggested otherwise in either of these -- and they are simple enough concepts that if there was anything wrong about them, it wouldn't have taken us over a century to find out if they were actually false somehow (hint: they're true).
That said, we did manage to further support them beyond any doubt:
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/la09300d.html
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/sc05400j.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141868/
along with four-digits worth of other papers agreeing with the same
To support all of the above, we have papers meta-analyzing that 97% of climate scientists & papers agree with man-made (or anthropogenic) climate change:
https://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.abstract
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/meta
Among abstracts expressing a position on [anthropogenic global warming], 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.
(for those who aren't knowledgeable about the science community, 97% is really fucking good and may as well be considered scientific fact).
tldr: man-made climate change is absolutely supported by the scientific community, and there is far beyond enough research and evidence to take action on it
We've known every step of that process since the 1800s. John Tyndall discovered the concept of greenhouse gases in 1859. Svante Arrhenius calculated the impact it would have if atmospheric CO2 was doubled in 1896 (though it didn't factor in everything because climate science wasn't mature at that point, but it got the jist and observed the core concept). To my knowledge, no credible papers since then have suggested otherwise in either of these -- and they are simple enough concepts that if there was anything wrong about them, it wouldn't have taken us over a century to find out if they were actually false somehow (hint: they're true).
That said, we did manage to further support them beyond any doubt:
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/la09300d.html
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/sc05400j.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141868/
along with four-digits worth of other papers agreeing with the same
To support all of the above, we have papers meta-analyzing that 97% of climate scientists & papers agree with man-made (or anthropogenic) climate change:
https://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.abstract
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/meta
[quote]Among abstracts expressing a position on [anthropogenic global warming], 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.[/quote]
(for those who aren't knowledgeable about the science community, 97% is really fucking good and may as well be considered scientific fact).
tldr: man-made climate change is absolutely supported by the scientific community, and there is far beyond enough research and evidence to take action on it
If you don't think climate change wasn't a large problem caused by humans you're not looking at it with an objective eye.
JarateKinghttps://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
You've linked a study thats behind a paywall mr big brain.
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
[/quote]
You've linked a study thats behind a paywall mr big brain.
Doom1JarateKinghttps://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
You've linked a study thats behind a paywall mr big brain.
Yeah that's something that happens in science all the time. You can read the abstract to get an idea what it's about (I included it because it makes it clear that we are actively fine-tuning the accuracy of our models, which only works if the concept behind it is essentially undisputed and well-tested).
If you're not satisfied with that one, maybe the 3 other examples and the 3 meta-analyses going over thousands of papers should be enough for you
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.475774
[/quote]
You've linked a study thats behind a paywall mr big brain.[/quote]
Yeah that's something that happens in science all the time. You can read the abstract to get an idea what it's about (I included it because it makes it clear that we are actively fine-tuning the accuracy of our models, which only works if the concept behind it is essentially undisputed and well-tested).
If you're not satisfied with that one, maybe the 3 other examples and the 3 meta-analyses going over thousands of papers should be enough for you