| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561198443218901 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:482953173] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:1:241476586 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | July 26, 2020 |
| Last Posted | February 26, 2024 at 8:36 PM |
| Posts | 572 (0.4 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | 2.21 |
| Windows Sensitivity | None. Accel: 1.9 |
| Raw Input | |
DPI |
800 |
Resolution |
1280x720 |
Refresh Rate |
60hz |
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | Razer Viper Mini Corded |
| Keyboard | Integrated |
| Mousepad | None |
| Headphones | None |
| Monitor | Integrated |
Wandumhttps://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.kym-cdn.com%2Fentries%2Ficons%2Fmobile%2F000%2F033%2F189%2Ftumblr_33caa6fa2d9060d1ebf32b7f13a3bf38_59ae975d_1280.jpg&f=1&nofb=1
I can't automute easily; I still feel like posting here anyway, despite the negative reception to me.
He could just make a new account…
I forgot about konr's reply. oops
Anyway you seem to be talking about trust(ed) clients. Viewing your arguments in the context of a trusted client, I would totally agree with you, but you seem to be targeting general anticheats, so I am going to assume you were not directly talking about trusted clients.
konrAimIsADickBeing able to see exactly how a game handles a particular thing is 100% going to make it WAY easier for every programmer that wants to make cheats.twiikuuAnti-cheat development is an uphill battle in any case, and providing access to the sources help cheat makers way more than it helps anyone else, the majority of anti-cheat solutions depend massively on security by obscurityThen that's more the fault of bad anti-cheats, not really the fault of the open source philosophy.
Also open source only really enables amateur cheaters; most cheaters just use reverse engineered code, so unless if there's not that many dedicated cheaters, a game going open source is not really going to be the cause of more cheaters.
konrWhen you say that "most" cheaters "just use reverse engineered code", what you mean is that they have to reverse engineer executables because they don't have another option... because it's not open source.
konrConsider that you may actually be wrong once in a while.
I actually question myself commonly; it's a core mindset of critical thinking.
tommyare they better than visual studio project files? what counts as a good build tool
Both answers vary based on context. Generally though visual studio project files are not used, because they force an IDE dependency on people, which is frowned upon in software development, due to the variability of a developer's environment.
twiikuuAimIsADickValve should not have used an IDE-dependent build workflow (Visual Studio Project files) for the Source Engine; instead they should have went with a dedicated build tool that is accessible, like Makefile, CMake, meson, ninja, etc. It would reduce expenses going to Visual Studio.those build tools are all dog shit.
How exactly? are those build tools bad?
Geknaiirgreat idea
Thank you!
Geknaiirhave you ever thought about rebranding yourself from a name about bad aim to something that youre passionate about maybe like LinuxMeshFrametimeNavKING
Nah. I'm too lazy to change names.
tommyi think that bots should be able to airstrafe
same.
phoroformake the bots learn surf_utopia
I tried getting bots to surf, but they seem to keep trying to go forward (use W) every time they enter a navigation area.
pajaronobody really cares man
but I do! It could improve the gameplay of TF2 bots.
I was thinking about making nav meshes for MvM maps in the next potato.tf campaign. Among that process I thought about getting bots to airstrafe.
Bots will always try to move in navigation areas, regardless if they are on the ground. Therefore it is possible to control bot movement in air. As a result, I am able to get bots to airstrafe through a technique I use, and I have achieved the behavior in a test nav mesh.
However I was not certain if this is a good idea, so I thought: Should bots be able to airstrafe?
Valve should not have used an IDE-dependent build workflow (Visual Studio Project files) for the Source Engine; instead they should have went with a dedicated build tool that is more accessible and IDE-independent, like Makefile, CMake, meson, ninja, etc. It would reduce expenses going to Visual Studio.
Cool. I wish there was a merger for weapon script files, because weapon scripts can only be fully overrided, not partially overrided.
Remove all the "//", since those prevent the game from interpreting a line as a command.
Also you should just use mastercomfig; mastercomfig will handle the optimizations for you, and you can also customize settings easier.
I don't recommend creating your own performance mod; your performance mod may use outdated information, bad settings and UI (design), and might be unreliable.
For starters what is your TF2 environment (mods, hardware, OS, etc.)? Have you tried a clean install?
I think you should try out mastercomfig, and then tinker around with module settings until you find the most optimal configuration for your environment.
It's also a good idea to use "net_graph 4" (why is there no inline code formatting?) to get network information.
aieraAimIsADickIs it possible to generate particle files, so that people can use variable-duration particles?yes
Awesome!
I think UNIX shell scripts should be used for easy portability; windows users can just install a UNIX shell (like bash) to run the script.
bearodactylReeroent_create logic_timer targetname !self RefireTime 0.015; ent_fire !self addoutput "OnTimer Player:addoutput:health 900:0:-1"if this is the kind of alien code gorge somehow writes to do overheal i am genuinely curious what kind of cursed shit goes on in maps like xhappy lmao
ent_fire !self addoutput "health 99999"
What's wrong with the code?
ent_fire !self addoutput "health 99999"Is likely the only line needed; the logic_timer is redundant.
Is it possible to generate particle files, so that people can use variable-duration particles?
AsherasherasherFriendly neighborhood tf2 youtuber 3kliksphilip
What do you mean? Doesn't this site have a Counter-Strike: Global Offensive section though?