Menachem
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198041226420
SteamID3 [U:1:80960692]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:0:40480346
Country United States
Signed Up October 31, 2015
Last Posted August 10, 2024 at 7:31 AM
Posts 1187 (0.4 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input  
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
1 ⋅⋅ 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ⋅⋅ 79
#24 The State of TF2, Post-Valve Meetings in TF2 General Discussion
samifaceI think we should also discuss the fact that so many gamers out there know tf2 as pubs and have no clue 6v6 is even a thing. It's hard to grow support when no one knows we exist.

yup. played tf2 for 4 years prior to finding comp. 900 hours of casual, picked up an extra 1.5k in the year since. only found out because im a loser who browses /r/tf2.

MR_SLINshould we align ourselves with the developers and play the matchmaking game that they’re designing and iterating upon?

I know I literally just said I've only been around for a year, but from what I hear people have already played (or experimented with) formats like what Valve has on the table right now. It's a nice concept, and I personally would be willing to play on a team in a league with Valve rules if there was a guarantee of some meaningful iteration, but a) there is no such guarantee and b) I imagine most people would rather quit and move to other games than wait for Valve to figure out what the fuck it's doing. I don't see why Valve can't stop ignoring what already exists and take clues about what to do from there. For every time you answer questions like

MR_SLINAfter all, how can people expect us as competitive players and volunteers to put so much of our time and energy into a game that the developers don’t even think will succeed as an esport?

there are ten people who aren't reading or won't care. You can't type this problem away at this point unless you're a Valve employee typing up the patch notes we all want to see.

MR_SLINThe fact of the matter is that the developers aren’t convinced that we know best and they’ll want to make progress in their own time with the help of the ENTIRE community

This statement is dripping with irony. They totally want the help of us clueless peons, I'm sure. There's a difference between "we want to re-test these restrictions" and "fuck you guys, our game balance is fine." I'm sure you can guess which statement I feel Valve is coming from. Somehow I don't think they're getting any good data from their matchmaking system at the moment, and I don't see what you think they want us to do to help them get that data. The solutions you have offered center around playing weird formats with the 11 friends we all have on hand who are willing to do so, with no explanation as to why the fuck would Valve care what those results of those games are. I guess you expect everyone to believe Valve reads the forums regularly? Sure, I remember that one time Jill posted. And then ignored what the thread was about with the next update.

On restrictions you go on to say "it’s interesting to at least think about it to yourself and brainstorm as a community," but I don't see what this community hasn't already thought through a thousand times.

MR_SLINCan we get Valve to confirm in writing that they’ll be heavily investing into TF2’s esports scene?
Unlikely. Valve’s approach will likely involve updating matchmaking and quietly gauging community sentiment as they build out new features.

We don't need Valve to confirm monetary support for comp. We need an indication that Valve has noticed the comp scene that does exist. As it is, it's as though they've noticed there are a few semi-famous players that they have talk to here and there since those people take it upon themselves to come and visit, but have no idea why those people are well known and still think comp TF2 is some brand new thing. It's great talking about getting the community together to help Valve make this a thing, but pretty much every single person with the experience and connections to make that happen gave up years ago. They're never coming back, you will never be able to say anything to bring them back, and the people who remain are here to play a game they already think is fun, not to fuck around with with Valve halfheartedly hoping the stupid bullshit they're putting up with will actually make some kind of difference.

HildrethValve can pump money in and they could add Matchmaking to mirror 6v6 format as it stands but people will not play it for the same reason they don't play Leagues / PUGS / ESL / TF2Center (okay for TF2C it's because the admins are cunts) - Just isn't enough interest to bring in sizable numbers

I don't think that's the end-all-be-all of the situation. Seems like every time I talk to a player who doesn't want to play comp, it's either because they're not interested in comp play (in which case they're not playing ANY games competitively) or because 6s isn't "real" TF2. Player interest isn't a concrete thing. REAL Valve support would change that second group in an instant, but as of now that group doesn't care because what Valve has supported is garbage for both newbies and veterans. I don't think most people even want Valve to straight up mirror the format that currently exists, but I do think they want Valve to take it as the basis for developing the game further.

posted about 8 years ago
#27 if you dislike tf2center.... in TF2 General Discussion
Hasssassinfade-BartenderNot a good idea to divide a small community but I see how this is good in the long run.
tf2c effectively already did that by arbitrarily banning a ton of people

Lets not forget what happened when CEVO was introduced

for those of us that started playing after CEVO dropped the game?

posted about 8 years ago
#189 sigafoo's Challenge Cup in TF2 General Discussion
BumFreezeso it turned from testing 6s with a liberal whitelist and 1 scout into testing hl without a pyro and a spy
:thinking:

dont be silly. the soldier and scout might go spy occasionally

posted about 8 years ago
#246 Updating cp_snakewater in Map Discussion
YrrMenachemWhy would that even be a rule, though? Seems unlikely that there's no fine print in the workshop agreement that says "the shit you submit is ours after you submit it"

Otherwise it's just a dumb rule that they have no reason whatsoever to adhere to. Even if there is some legal reason it would take all of 30 seconds to send those content creators an email and get permission
I mean when they buy the map to put it into the actual game they very much do own it, that's how that works.

I assume the rule is there to stop people going "oh btw now that my map is in the game this texture/model/whatever my friend made is vitally important to the map can you give out some money to them and put it in the game?"

I'm not defending the rule or anything here, just saying what I know from talking to people with maps in the game.

Do they actually pay money to mapmakers?

Even if they do, how hard can it be to say no?

posted about 8 years ago
#244 Updating cp_snakewater in Map Discussion
YrrIt's absolutely nothing to do with competitive, it's straight up just their rules on adding assets/contributors to previously accepted content.

Why would that even be a rule, though? Seems unlikely that there's no fine print in the workshop agreement that says "the shit you submit is ours after you submit it"

Otherwise it's just a dumb rule that they have no reason whatsoever to adhere to. Even if there is some legal reason it would take all of 30 seconds to send those content creators an email and get permission

posted about 8 years ago
#176 sigafoo's Challenge Cup in TF2 General Discussion
MR_SLINblazeIf you weren't pleased with the initial tournament you announced can I ask why you wouldn't want to host an unofficial valve tournament? You could use the current mm format/rules or a format that is somewhat tangible with the direction valve has the game heading so they can accurately gather feedback and at least have an opportunity to see how their version of tf2 would play out.I don't think Valve thinks that TF2 with no class limits is the best way to push the game forward.

i dont think anyone, not even the people who have been to/talked to valve, knows what valve thinks about tf2

i dont think valve knows what valve thinks about tf2 for more than 5 minutes at a time

posted about 8 years ago
#596 PugChamp in Projects

Can confirm.

Champs are down, Faceit ladders are never up, Stadium is dead, refuse to turn off adblock. wat do

posted about 8 years ago
#96 Leaked Donald Trump Comments in World Events
owlfire mike pence
pence must go

seriously though despite how much everyone who lives close to a city hates him, i bet he'd have been reelected. the disconnect is fucking crazy

posted about 8 years ago
#2 i58 HUGumentary | hugs.tf in Videos

2 minutes in, havent seen anybody hugging. i feel mislead

posted about 8 years ago
#19 My Theory in Off Topic
flatlinethat is a small udder

hormones can do that to ya

posted about 8 years ago
#29 Want To Play a Lobby? in TF2 General Discussion

I was just expecting to play granary again. solid lobby fellas

posted about 8 years ago
#33 ESEA S23 W3: froyotech vs. Circa eSports TF2 in Matches

am i supposed to blame esea for not updating the client or valve for updating their game on match days?

posted about 8 years ago
#19 Free stuff in Off Topic

aw trotz why. sad memes all around :(

tbh i still want ur crusaders crossbow tho

posted about 8 years ago
#20 TF2 update for 9/27/16 (9/28/16 UTC) in TF2 General Discussion

Also, watching demos appears to be slightly broken. Hitting tab now gives me this: http://imgur.com/haDp2g2

posted about 8 years ago
#19 TF2 update for 9/27/16 (9/28/16 UTC) in TF2 General Discussion
mousiopefirst try party of 2 from europe connected to a virginia server ...

l
o
l

plz be a fluke

posted about 8 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ⋅⋅ 79