yuki
How can you say that? 99+% players will make a decision to, lets say, kill the other team's medic. Goes behind, misses a bunch of shots for whatever reason. Just because it didn't work out doesn't mean it was necessarily the wrong decision - they just failed the execution.
In some cases, yes, you can attribute you making a decision to your skill in executing said decision. HOWEVER, making a decision to do something out of your comfort zone is what helps make you a better player.
Fair point. I guess in my head, when I'm going to try something out of my comfort zone like that, I say to myself "I don't know if this is a good decisions, but I'm going to see if it works." Which, to me, is different from saying "it was the right decision, I'm just not good enough to have successfully pulled it off".
I think what I'm trying to say is that players should be able to distinguish between rationalizing a result with "I made the correct decision, I just didn't execute it properly" and "I made the right decision, I just don't have the DM/skill to backup what I tried to do". It'd be like a scout managing to get in and have a few shots on the medic, but missed them (using the former to rationalize why it went wrong) and a scout that tried to walk into a 2v1 or something (and saying "if I had just hit more shots I would've won that fight). In that last case, it might've been the right decision for someone like clockwork, but for someone else (like me), it'd be the wrong one.
I just got the impressions from Kapoww's comment that you shouldn't base your decisions off of your DM, because you should absolutely factor that into any of your decision making.