I need this.

@samiface / b4nny

What model of monitors are provided for the invite bracket?

stop overexaggerating

the op weapons are going to get rebanned the next time teams scrim with this whitelist.

idk what you're trying to say, but suiciding an engy defending last for 10% AT MOST is not worth it. it's essentially high risk, low reward.

ex 1 (large disad):
it only takes 4 seconds to build 10% at max building rate, but it honestly will rarely ever do 10% because it's impossible to get that close to a medic unless he deserves it. in the case it does 10%, however, the other team has large enough advantage to the point where 4 seconds AND 5v6 is beneficial for the attacking team.

ex 2 (small disad):
you should almost never suicide a player defending last if you have small disad, as you can just get your uber anyway and force them early with another offclass (for example, sniper). by that time, you should have uber.

also please don't make me / other scouts abuse the soda popper to show that it's incredibly overpowered AND stupid. it's a weapon that actually takes a little bit to get used to in order to make it viable, btw, so you might not notice players being insanely good at it right away. none of you who want it in invite have ever played against it, except, afaik, me. it is without a doubt the most ridiculous weapon i've ever played against in this game. almost as OP as the RR + wrangler combo. you can jump 5 times. in case you don't know what that implies, you can make a ton of room for your team and you will never die if you know how to airstrafe. unless you have used this weapon or have played against it for multiple seasons, i would recommend not giving your opinion on this weapon.

first of all, nobody was able to argue why the pomson is even a good weapon since it got nerfed. it was stated that in most situations, it might lose a medic 1-2% (?) ubercharge from a medium to far distance. however, I can agree with you in that this is one of those "stupid" weapons that probably shouldn't even be in the game. It's really just a pointless weapon that won't do much.

and i'm also sure the quickfix will get banned after one day of scrims

Large

What model of monitors are provided for the invite bracket?

yomps + highfive

that's a compliment for me tbh

@b4nny
The unsuitable part is you're not even being remotely satirical. You legitimately think that if somebody doesn't agree with you on this topic, they don't want the game to move forward--they like the same old tf2 and that won't get us anywhere. I agree that it won't get us anywhere, but like I said in the previous post, there's another direction to take BECAUSE of the way valve works not only as a company, but also because their specific tf2 team is so slow, impractical, and to be frank, not very intelligent (even when given advice). I really hope you recognize that you can't follow the steps of playtesting a large list with tf2's specific team.

Before you answer this question banny, it should be reworded. Of course you don't think there are going to be just one or two updates that solves these issues. You think it'll take time. I understand that you're fine with it taking a while to ultimately reach a point where we wouldn't have to ban any weapons. What about, however, the weapons in this game that can NOT be balanced and that can not be fun to play against even if changed, unless they were revised to the point where nobody would use them anymore (aka not "balanced")?

Can you explain how to go about some of those weapons? how can something like the beggars bazooka, air strike, or parachute ever be balanced if you were to keep in mind what makes soldier as fun, challenging, unique, and balanced as it is? Do you think people play soldier in competitive to sit in the sky and spam rockets or even to shoot multiple rockets at once, or is it because of the unique element of soldier that only arena shooters (or a mix of arena shooters and other fps's) might offer? I personally enjoy the unique and challenging part of soldier. To reiterate, you can suggest that it takes skill to use the beggars or airstrike, but is it really the same feel that makes tf2 the mix of arena shooter it is?

You can add all these weapons and also balance them, but why? Why would you make an fps game, especially one that already has a diverse selection of classes, more moba-esque in the sense that picking weapons is one of the main strategies? That was never the fun part of tf2, and it never will be. It has nothing to do with being afraid of change; it has to do with change in the wrong direction, the direction that everyone including yourself never enjoyed. You're lying to yourself if you disagree with the last sentence, because you constantly complain about specific weapons used in hl and how they should've never been implimented in the game. That's almost word for word from one of your streams a few months ago, btw.

It's significantly better to sleep that similar amount every day rather than to try to catch up on the weekends by sleeping 12 hours, for example. Catching up on sleep (to that large extent) doesn't actually help too much, unfortunately. Going to bed at the same time within around 30 min makes it a bit easier to fall asleep quickly, not to mention it's just healthier to keep a consistent sleep schedule.

You said, though, that you had trouble sleeping after being up for 36 hours, so you still might not be able to sleep consistently because of other issues.

What's the reasoning behind PurpleShirt ? >:o

Did u know showstopper is half black