https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/5ztyxn/i_made_a_steam_group_bot_that_automatically_send/

1). jAguaR fiEND
2). godyapper

Dear corsa, you are my favorite troller dog, please do not listen to all the haters out there, they have nothing on you. Your ping cannot be matched and you are insane at everything you do. I wish I was you. Sincerely, your biggest fan

Snakewater
Process
Gullywash
Viaduct
Sunshine
Badlands
Metalworks
Granary

ban the cowmangler thx

pastapeter

5cp isn't inherently stalematey although how it's balanced in the current meta leads to a lot of stalemates for several reasons. 1: Round timers are excessively long allowing for teams to just sit on their advantage for huge chunks of the map. 2: The game revolves too much around ubercharge. The only thing I see a game like overwatch having over tf2 is that each character has an ult that can be used as a pushable advantage. If ubers were somehow made a bit less relevant dry pushing and going for aggressive peeks would be a lot more common ground. 3: The map pool honestly isn't ideal. You have maps with too few and narrow choke points like granary and then maps like sunshine with decent flank routes but it's literally kitefest because of how big the map is (which is further exacerbated by how the game revolves around uber). 4: The team on the defensive doesn't have any incentive to go for a push (unless it's a really good pick) again due to uber. In CS if you are getting destroyed you get an incentive via additional money after consecutive round losses. I don't know necessarily how this would be mitigated but I'm sure the respawn timers could be adjusted to incentivize aggressive pushing for the team that doesn't have mid.

It doesn't make much sense to me to switch to AD if your problem with the current meta is the stalemates. AD is suited for slow, very methodical gameplay. This is why it works so well in counterstrike. I've briefly played your suggestion in a few fortress forever games and it's way more stale than 5cp imo. It's literally just one team conc jumping trying to get the flag while the other team sits there with stickies on the point, a sentry, and stationary soldiers shooting at the flag. It's not fun to play or watch whatsoever. For me comp tf2 is defined by the back and forth tug of war which is perfectly represented via 5cp/koth and forcing one team to play on attack or defense completely takes away what makes comp tf2 so unique and fun.

tfw weed saves tf2

go EVL!

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ DUWATNA TAKE MY APPENDIX ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

I'd imagine there's a fair amount of people that are just fine with the 5cp meta besides maybe the map pool (I'd actually love to see more koth maps). What's so wrong with having one or two game modes as the focus for a comp scene? I don't play cs and complain that hostage isn't viable competitively because it would be ridiculous. Ctf I've never seen outside of maybe different iterations of quake and ancient clips of ricco doming nerds on god awful maps. Payload is more suited for loose, mobaesque environments which is already catered to by overwatch and paladins so this seems like a pointless route to pursue imo.

which invite captains wanted this garbage?

the quickfix is actually a joke, please for the love of god get rid of this weapon.

Because unlike some of the other horrible unlocks which should be banned or never be unbanned unless they are inherently changed to be made somewhat skill based, the crossbow utilizes a skill based mechanic for healing. Conceptually it's a great idea for a weapon it's just not the most balanced especially after they made it build uber. Other weapons like the parachute (completely removes the mastery of jumping and airstrafing that makes top level soldiers so unique) or sandman (a weapon that stuns players in comp tf2 :thinking:) are conceptually terrible weapons that will always be gimmicky unless you completely change them or nerf them to hell.

This argument makes no sense whatsoever to me. Is csgo a promod for having different round/bomb timers? It also makes the assumption that valve created these weapons from the start to be used in a competitive environment when this obviously isn't true. Therefore the shoulder of burden should be on valve to fix these weapons not on the competitive players when A): there's no evidence whatsoever that having a looser whitelist would result in valve making any change whatsoever in any sort of reasonable timeline especially when no one from the comp scene or the pub scene is interested in valves garbage matchmaking system anyway B): many of the unlocks that are banned and some that were allowed are gimmicky, not skill based, and have been complained about for years C): these weapons will reduce the enjoyment for the competitive players who have been lead on by these completely devoid of evidence promises. If Valve was serious and had the resources to positively affect tf2 they would create some forum of open dialogue between them and top level players/organizers from around the world and would have made a matchmaking system that wasn't awful. Clearly they aren't interested in either of these things so there is no reason to allow the last remaining awful unlocks.

Also where are you getting this remove all the unlocks idea from? I'm pretty sure realistically no one from the comp scene wants this besides a few shitposters. 2007 tf2 is frankly awful and some of the unlocks have definitely added to the game in a positive way. The problem is that valve has released many weapons that are not only unbalanced but completely lacking of any mechanical skill. Allow these weapons and what does tf2 become? The main thing in my opinion that makes tf2 unique in a competitive sense is that it has an incredible high degree of mechanical skill. Take this away and oversaturate the game with unlock after unlock it makes tf2 more bland not unique. There are plenty of other team based fps at this point that don't require much mechanically so I guess all tf2 would have is that it's free to play lmao.

https://clips.twitch.tv/b4nny/DistinctHareWutFace