Driver arguments are always funny to me. If you are too wrapped up in brand names to realize that both companies have driver problems every week, you're blind.

what's important is that the text was written by alfa. trough the doors!

for what it's worth, I ran through it once pretty quickly and got this result.

http://i.imgur.com/5wwk7CF.jpg

then, I really took my time and stared at the screen until my eyes were about to bleed and got this:

http://i.imgur.com/SKOZHaA.jpg

I'm not sure how accurate this kind of test is, because there doesn't seem to be any metric. I know I have trouble with hues all across the spectrum, so I don't doubt its accuracy, but it'd be nice if it showed a base scale, like
___ for normal
___ for protanomaly sufferers
___ for protanopia sufferers
___ for deuteranomaly sufferers
___ for deuteranopia sufferers
___ for tritanomaly sufferers
___ for tritanopia sufferers

etc

you guys are mean.

there was an invite illuminati meeting on this subject today.
the official answer to every 'tell me what class to play' thread is now

medic

enjoy playing your new class

(i was joking)

i had this problem once but then i put my headphones on in such a way that the left speaker was over my left ear and the right speaker was over my right ear and the problem went away on its own

I have around 30 copies of Adobe Acrobat 9 Standard and 4 copies of Adobe Acrobat 8 Standard from computers that were purchased from Dell. The HDDs were immediately replaced with SSDs and the software was never used.

I have no use for these, and I doubt many of you do, either, but if anyone does, I will sell them pretty cheap.

I'm thinking something like $15 for Acrobat 8 and $25 for Acrobat 9. They seem to be selling for anywhere from $20-50 each on eBay, so I think these are good prices.

What you'll get is the sealed install media with a serial number. I will cover shipping in the continental US.

If you are interested, add me on steam or post here and I'll add you.

wtf, ninja editing your post to change 'double bo3' into 'bo3' doesn't make my math bad, anusbreath.

apparently he cant bend his fingers at all but his forearm has no bone and therefore can be curved like a fish hook and he can touch his elbow with it

and this is a normal arm

http://i.imgur.com/M9C3Exl.jpg

If you are talking about separate, standalone tournaments every Friday, your timeframe seems impossible. 1 6 teams would mean 15 games before grand-finals, and double bo3 means at least 4 more games. If team A wins the first bo3 and team B wins the second bo3, you'd need another single game or another bo3. This means anywhere from 19-24 games to determine a winner.

Best case scenario: 19 games
Winning team plays 7 games.
8 servers needed to ensure all teams play without waiting for available servers.
Granted, there will be games that don't last the full 30 minutes, but if we assume all games take 30 minutes and everyone plays the initial round simultaneously, the time required would be 3.5 hours. Hitting that time would require zero pauses, zero seconds of delay in getting a game started, and zero seconds of delay between each game. The winning team would be playing the entire 3.5 hours.

Worst case scenario: 24 games
Winning team plays 12 games.
This would raise the minimum time to 6 hours (assuming all maps take 30 minutes and each bo3 goes to 3 maps) and would result in a grand finals lasting 4.5 hours.

The idea seems good enough, but you'd probably need to revise the time table and amend the final match to a single bo3 or a single bo5 at the heftiest.

understatement of the century

***unless that person is alfa and he's telling you to use kritz through an obviously stickied badlands choke when the entire other team is behind spire not peeking. got dam transylvanians

Commonly overlooked is the fact that your team needs to listen to the main-caller. Even if the call isn't ideal, 6 players on the same page will result in a play with a much better chance of success than 3 players going and 3 players arguing.

If you're scrimming, it's probably better to just go with the call and discuss why it was a poor call later. This makes sure you're all on the same page and it also gives the main-caller the opportunity to see his/her choice fail which enables that person to learn from it.

this is the best news i have ever heard