Foundation: Matter the Body ItselfNow that the absolute itself actually exists for the first time history there is no question of the transcendent difference being overcome by the simple form of speech, as it were, by the mere saying. Nor is it overcome by the absolute saying itself. Indeed, the transcendent difference is overcome by the absolute itself prior to the saying itself, by thought itself prior to the silence itself. Indeed, now, the transcendent identity of the silence itself is the absolutely unconditioned word itself thought, now formally predicated on the material perfection of thought itself before now: the thing which is now being absolutely thought for the first time in history is the priority of the body itself to the saying: the absolute grace of existence itself to which there is no alternative absolute. Clearly there is no question of absolutely nothing in essence overcoming the transcendent difference overcome before now by the conception of matter itself (there is no denying the matter of fact of the history of intelligible matter, namely, the absolute occurrence of of an eternal actuality, the perfect elimination of the irrational element of matter itself). Such a redundancy of the irrational is inconceivable now except as a mask of the desire to conceal the perception of the body itself, as the attempt to put on the inconceivable absolute, essentially incapable of attribution—this essentially insatiable desire to exist—specific, perpetual non-existence—now in fact simply inconceivable (for the time being unmasked). Overcome in the meantime by the priority of the absolute saying itself, it knows nothing itself of freedom itself: an irrational redundancy conceivable only as the immediate non-existence of the absolute contradiction: the absolute confirmation of the immediacy of the existence itself precluding in essence an automatic response, the categorical imperative of the absolute saying itself being that nothing is able to be said now except it be said in essence, i.e., except it be immediately intelligible in terms of the fact in essence of history itself, namely, that the transcendental object is known to be so absolutely. There is now absolutely no alternative in fact to the absolute constitution of the absolute love except it be itself a chimera in essence, i.e., except it be itself unintelligible: there is only the silence which now itself is thought for the first time in history. Absolutely nothing is thought except it be the existence of the absolute itself—the existence of existence.
That teeming mass of sentences that seemingly have no meaning is an excerpt from a book that is written by someone who was not only a college professor, but someone who had five books published. It was written by D.G. Leahy in his book Foundation: Matter the Body Itself. Not only that, but it's actually a modern work, published in 1996. I found it interesting how something could be so entirely incomprehensible. Do you think it's just bad writing or is the subject matter just so in depth that it means nothing to your average person?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._G._Leahy
https://books.google.com/books/about/Foundation.html?id=HvMVC4_xcN0C