who tf is letting autocomplete replace their frontal lobe or critical thinking
AI is evil, and anti human. If you like it, you align with those ideas.
I'd just like to say that DLSS and DLAA and other AI techniques that are shoehorned in games nowadays and replace working previous rendering techniques look like garbage and I hate them
SeinfeldindustIt's a good thing that the hurdle of visualization has been knocked down for everyone, it's the product that matters more.
if anyone actually believes stuff like this, please just go to your local art museum. i had just visited the chicago art museum again recently, and i stood completely in actual AWE at the scale and detail of some of the finest paintings in human history. it was impossible to not be humbled by the ability to walk up to the painting and see the innate physicality to the paintings. it was impossible to not be absolutely intrigued and inspired by some of the stories and circumstances that caused these paintings to be. art (in all its forms, not just visual) is so much more than the end result, it's something that humans innately have craved to do from the back of their psyche since before the discovery of fire. commodifying that and turning it into an automated process is anti-human
I mean intermediate steps like storyboarding or concept design. Brother no shit real works are way more than meets the eye, and that's what they've got over AI.
if anyone actually believes stuff like this, please just go to your local art museum. i had just visited the chicago art museum again recently, and i stood completely in actual AWE at the scale and detail of some of the finest paintings in human history. it was impossible to not be humbled by the ability to walk up to the painting and see the innate physicality to the paintings. it was impossible to not be absolutely intrigued and inspired by some of the stories and circumstances that caused these paintings to be. art (in all its forms, not just visual) is so much more than the end result, it's something that humans innately have craved to do from the back of their psyche since before the discovery of fire. commodifying that and turning it into an automated process is anti-human[/quote]
I mean intermediate steps like storyboarding or concept design. Brother no shit real works are way more than meets the eye, and that's what they've got over AI.
over-utilized and underdeveloped
also IP theft is dumb and bad
also IP theft is dumb and bad
it's so cool how these ai companies are allowed to scrape every piece of the internet that exists and torrent from every data base and face absolutely no repercussions
industI mean intermediate steps like storyboarding or concept design. Brother no shit real works are way more than meets the eye, and that's what they've got over AI.
As someone who works in the animation industry this statement makes me want to beat you over the head with a metal pipe jfc
Boarding and concept art are people's entire passions, the art of learning to board is actually so fucking difficult, and having a machine do that will still absolutely suck the soul out of so much of what we see whether it's animated or live-action.
Having a robot do concept art and be the foundation of an entire project is just such a mind-numbingly anti-art and imo anti-human take.
Go look up the concept art of your favorite animated movie and genuinely tell me that we would be better off letting a robot do that work instead of a human. Why deprive people the joy of making that art for a living?
The AMPTP studios are so interested in depriving people of these jobs just to make a quick buck, but beyond the economic aspect of AI, I really truly believe it's the philosophical argument that holds so much weight.
Like, so much effort and passion goes into learning these crafts (not just in animation but every art-form).
Why should robots get to make that art instead of people who genuinely devote their entire lives to mastering it?
It just seems so cruel to not let that be a career anymore
I mean intermediate steps like storyboarding or concept design. Brother no shit real works are way more than meets the eye, and that's what they've got over AI.[/quote]
As someone who works in the animation industry this statement makes me want to beat you over the head with a metal pipe jfc
Boarding and concept art are people's entire passions, the art of learning to board is actually so fucking difficult, and having a machine do that will still absolutely suck the soul out of so much of what we see whether it's animated or live-action.
Having a robot do concept art and be the foundation of an entire project is just such a mind-numbingly anti-art and imo anti-human take.
Go look up the concept art of your favorite animated movie and genuinely tell me that we would be better off letting a robot do that work instead of a human. Why deprive people the joy of making that art for a living?
The AMPTP studios are so interested in depriving people of these jobs just to make a quick buck, but beyond the economic aspect of AI, I really truly believe it's the philosophical argument that holds so much weight.
Like, so much effort and passion goes into learning these crafts (not just in animation but every art-form).
Why should robots get to make that art instead of people who genuinely devote their entire lives to mastering it?
It just seems so cruel to not let that be a career anymore
nobody should give a shit about any "art" that wasnt created from a human's ideas and passion, it's meaningless slop that happens to Resemble art
if a human didnt care to make it, then a human shouldnt care to consume it
if a human didnt care to make it, then a human shouldnt care to consume it
industConcerning art... I think if it's good or worthwhile or beautiful (taking into account the effort or lack of effort), it deserves to float to the top. With the exception of FB boomers, people know if something's garbage or not. It doesn't take anything away from handmade art, just a couple jobs and that's the nature of technological advancement. Just another tool to learn to reach higher than you could before. It's a good thing that the hurdle of visualization has been knocked down for everyone, it's the product that matters more.
I dont post on here often by this is genuinely one of the most depressing combination of sentences i have read on the website. "Its the product that matters more" "just a couple of jobs"
Please genuinely consider the bigger implications with things that are as damaging to the world as AI. Every search and every image that AI generates the environment and the world is worse than it was prior to it. No image or video created by AI will ever be art because art is the self expression of a human being and the contents of their soul. No technology as putrid as AI will ever be able to capture that.
I dont post on here often by this is genuinely one of the most depressing combination of sentences i have read on the website. "Its the product that matters more" "just a couple of jobs"
Please genuinely consider the bigger implications with things that are as damaging to the world as AI. Every search and every image that AI generates the environment and the world is worse than it was prior to it. No image or video created by AI will ever be art because art is the self expression of a human being and the contents of their soul. No technology as putrid as AI will ever be able to capture that.
AI already captures that because it's driven by the artist. It can't possibly make a Mona Lisa but it does help people express whatever they want to.
https://www.amazon.com/Steal-Like-Artist-Things-Creative/dp/0761169253
https://www.amazon.com/Steal-Like-Artist-Things-Creative/dp/0761169253?tag=teamfortresst-20
id find more meaning and expression in the text prompt you typed into the image generator, cause at least you wrote that yourself
Yrrif a human didnt care to make it, then a human shouldnt care to consume it
What counts as art? Does a well designed car count as art?
Would you buy a car assembled by robots?
What counts as art? Does a well designed car count as art?
Would you buy a car assembled by robots?
i would not sit into a car designed and built by a stupid fucking llm that can't tell the difference between a human face and a funny shaped electrical plug but you can absolutely feel free to do society a favour and take it for a test run
Yeah no shit but where are we drawing the line? llms? image generators? facial recognition? speech recognition? ocr?
I would happily sit in a plane with some "ai" constraint optimised parts. you too may have without realising it
caaaaaaaaatEvery search and every image that AI generates the environment and the world is worse than it was prior to it.
even llms can have a very real positive effect on society. i don't think it's fair to conclude that "AI" is universally bad
I would happily sit in a plane with some "ai" constraint optimised parts. you too may have without realising it
[quote=caaaaaaaaat]Every search and every image that AI generates the environment and the world is worse than it was prior to it.[/quote]
even llms can have a very real positive effect on society. i don't think it's fair to conclude that "AI" is universally bad