That was a pretty good video smobo, critical thinking is what more people kinda need nowadays tbh

my steam won't show time idk why but I asked him if he was reviewed about 5 minutes later after the first conversation

He has alot more important shit to do then review some silver sniper because some random asked him to, could have atleast waited a day lmao

probably but the match is tonight and Its not fun to play against a hacker, my bad

I really don't understand how this "parody" at all refutes rick james videos???

Like you just poorly attempted to mimic a hackusation video with no actual fishy clips compared to the actually ridiculous fishy clips from the original videos? Like he didnt even point out anything that was in any way grasping for straws to indicate hacks? Almost all the video is pretty strong evidence for investigation even if its not conclusive of hacks.

It would have made sense if you actually attempted to logically refute why those clips might not seem fishy but it appears you're just acting like an ass bc ur upset over this guy being called a hacker over what appears to be strong ground for accusations???

to activate time stamps go to the top left corner that says "steam" then go to "friends" then you should see "Display timestamps in chat log".

He actually was using a lot of the exact same footage (the only differences being wireframes turned off and more context around each of the shots). Admittedly there were a few shots in the original video that were not present in the one that smobo just made.

The most notable omission for me was the shot that appeared to be on the head of a sniper standing on the other side of an otherwise blank wall. I would have liked to have seen this shot without wireframes on, and in a larger context, to see if there was any reason for him to be shooting at that location. Of all of the shots that was the only one that I could not attribute to glimpses+prediction of effective team comms.

I think there are some shots that are really really fishy, but I also think that the majority of the people posting in this thread about him have already reached their own personal conclusion and that is dangerous.

So I guess instead of actually just investigating someone that so many appear to think is hacking and then clearing them and moving on we're just going to shift the conversation to tone policing and how "ridiculous" the claims appear to be?

If this was one person or only a select few people calling someone suspicious without much common outcry I would understand.

But if you have loads of people both from lower and higher levels calling for an investigation with mountains of available footage and potential resources being ignored or even mocked instead of just reviewing the case then I really don't know if I'm dealing with real people or trolls.

Seriously just investigate it and move on, if he's clean he's clean, its that simple. IDK why we'll just let it linger.

Do you seriously think the admins haven't investigated him? Every match he's played has been looked at. At least three times, just by me personally. We don't "clear" people because it's extremely hard to prove someone isn't hacking. Even things like attending a LAN have been shown to be insufficient with the CS:GO bans from last fall.

Nobody is ever cleared, but he's as close as we're going to get.

Well then that's all I needed to hear dude.

Case closed for me unless I see something indisputable.

That was easy.

.

Yea but the admins HAVE set it MULTIPLE times. And EVERY time they've said that there is no such thing as a player being "cleared" but folks love to ignore that and pretend that no one has looked into it. Mob mentality will give you the attention span of a gold fish, I'll tell you huwhat.

I'm not arguing that.

I just wanted to know from an admins mouth that he had been investigated and the evidence was/wasn't strong enough to convict.

Sure they can make mistakes or a case can be reevaluated but as long I know they haven't just ignored the outcry then I'm fine with it and I personally can't complain if they've already run him through the process with reasonable competence (my own personal conclusions aside since I'm not an admin obv).

you guys banned rondego in a heartbeat as soon as a bunch of plat players said hes hacking (and you all reviewed his povs), yet you wont convict bo4r even though hes 10x more obvious?

preach it

This is fucking ridiculous, look at the STV posts Rick James made, BLATANT wall hacking. This shit is so obvious it's infuriating. Almost as if someone is pulling strings for bo4r, at least, I'll believe that if he doesn't get banned from THIS much proof.

u admins need to get the foot out of your asses

,

That's part of the problem.

That's another part of the problem.

but pellovley he mains heavy don't see see the difference... if a heavy plays good he must be hacking heavy is a bad class... stup;id noob

Following the trend of this thread maybe we should wait until a lakeside STV comes out? I would like to see some analysis of that to see if we can find anything suspicious.

I will post a lakeside stv, however I doubt you'll find anything in it.

We have another lmaoboxer on twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/fakboi42o

Lets get this taken down!

that was fast

down, mice work team

Rip another one GG boys.

http://sizzlingstv.s3.amazonaws.com/stv/392592.zip

here's stv of lakeside.

.

Correlation does not imply causation. I'll be surprised if most people have done more about bo4r than just watch YT clips instead of what should be STV/POV.

I totally agree I think bo4r is paying them off.