none of these are my new years resolutions

then post yours you fruitcup

to stop shitposting

return a library book

i used to run 1147x620 but now i run 1920x1080

broke your resolution already

The results are pretty expected imo except I would expect 1024 x 768 and 1280 x 720 to have switched places.

I am curious about how big the 4:3 ratios would be in a csgo community.

Here's a csgo poll if you want to do that as well. I expect similar results with maybe a bit more 4:3

http://strawpoll.me/6497572 (Just copy and pasted original, credit to Stochast1c)

I can run 1920x1080 if i wanted to but i play in 1280x720.

"Native" should be instead of all those options.

The reason why I created the poll was for hud editing because element sizes and positioning can change depending on the resolution that you run. A hud that was created for 1080p might not look "right" on a 640x480 resolution. Knowing what resolutions the majority of the competitive playerbase uses is a helpful resource when creating a hud, so that the time spent editing benefits the most people. Native tells us none of these things.

I see, I thought it was just another "pointless pool". Sorry for the prejudgement.

y no 4k?

Final bump for anyone who hasn't seen the thread.

#13 Sorry, I just grabbed all the >1% resolutions from the steam hardware/software survey and apparently only .07% of people game in 4k. The only one I added was 640x480 since multiple people have asked me about that resolution with my hud.

1920*800, 12:5 aspect ratio

#15 I remember there being a thread on etf2l a while ago pleading for sv_restrict_aspect_ratio_fov 2, but looking through their config they are still on 0, Was there ever a league admin response as to why not restricting the aspect ratio was the resolution to that thread?

Also in line with etf2l, what do esea and ugc use for that cvar?

In the end I suppose it doesn't really matter as only a very small portion of the community uses a non-standard resolution.